Ultrasound-Guided Pulsed Radiofrequency In The Treatment Of Patients With Osteoarthritis Knee (USPRFGENOAK)

Osteoarthritis, Knee Clinical Trial

— USPRFGENOAK  

Official title:

Ultrasound-Guided Pulsed Radiofrequency Of The Genicular Nerves In The Treatment Of Patients With Osteoarthritis Knee Pain: Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controled Trial

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT02915120
• Other study ID #: RFPGEN-001
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: March 27, 2017
• Est. completion date: July 2024

Study information

• Verified date: April 2024
• Source: Hospital Son Llatzer
• Contact: Javier Mata, MD
• Phone: 0034871201233
• Email: jmata[@]hsll.es
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if patients with chronic painful knee osteoarthritis experience meaningful and long-term improvement in pain, function, and analgesic use after ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency of the genicular nerves following a double diagnostic genicular nerve blocks.

Description:

Osteoarthritis of the knee (kOA) is one of the main causes of disability. Population-based studies revealed that symptomatic kOA is present in 20-30% of the elderly population aged >65 years, and its prevalence is increasing due in part to the aging of the population. The goals of management of patients with kOA are to control pain and to minimize disability. Evidence-based guidelines from National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) and Osteoarthritis Research International (OARSI) suggest that the treatment should be multidisciplinary. Optimal management requires a combination of non-pharmacological (changes in lifestyle, pacing of activities, weight reduction, regular aerobic, acupuncture, muscle strengthening and range of motion exercises) and pharmacological modalities (paracetamol) when additional treatment is required. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) should be considered for patients with significant symptoms, and/or functional limitations associated with a reduced health-related quality of life, despite conservative therapy. However, there are some fragile patients who are at high risk during surgery and other patients who are not willing to undergo surgery. Because the number of patients will increase as the population ages, alternative approaches to alleviate their joint pain other than conventional treatments are necessary. Ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency of the genicular has recently become a promising treatment option in the management of osteoarthritis related knee pain.

This study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, parallel design. 142 out-patients with kOA will be recruited from Mallorca, Spain. Participants will be randomly allocated into two groups: Ultrasound-Guided Sham Genicular Nerve Pulsed Radiofrequency without active treatment (Sham GENPRF) and Ultrasound-Guided Real Genicular Nerve Pulsed Radiofrequency (Real GENPRF). All patients will be examined before and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the treatment (sham or active).

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 142
• Est. completion date: July 2024
• Est. primary completion date: July 2024
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 40 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Chronic knee pain with pain intensity of at least 4 out 10 on the VAS on most or all days for more than 3 months

• Patients of either sex with primary osteoarthritis of one or both knees fulfilling diagnostic criteria for osteoarthritis knee laid down by American College of Rheumatology.

• Patients also had to have a Kellgren-Lawrence (radiologic criterion) score of at least 2

• Pain resistant to conventional therapy including NSAIDs, opioids, muscle relaxants, oral steroids, physical therapy, and intra-articular injection therapy.

Exclusion Criteria:

• The patients with secondary osteoarthritis of knees

• Associated systemic arthropathies, e.g. rheumatoid arthritis and gout

• Previous radiofrequency ablation treatment for similar symptoms.

• Intra-articular knee corticosteroid or hyaluronic acid injection in the past 3 months.

• Active systemic or local infections at the site of proposed needle and electrode placement.

• Coagulopathy or other bleeding disorder

• Cognitive deficit.

• Unstable medical or psychiatric illness.

• Previous knee joint replacement surgery

• Patients missing two or more appointments consecutively were excluded from the study

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Osteoarthritis
• Osteoarthritis, Knee

Intervention

Procedure:
• Real Pulsed Radiofrequency
Pulsed Radiofrequency uses radiofrequency current in short (20 ms), high-voltage bursts; the "silent" phase (480 ms) allows time for heat elimination, generally keeping the target tissue below 42° C. The Radiofrequency (RF) electrode will be inserted through the canula, and RF lesions will be generated by applying pulsed RF treatment to the inferomedial (IM), superomedial (SM), and superolateral (SL) GN branches for 8 minutes at 42°C.
• Sham Pulsed Radiofrequency
Control patients will undergo the same procedure. The sensorial and motor stimulations will be applied too. The RF electrode will be then inserted through the cannula, and RF lesions will be simulated without applying pulsed RF treatment to the IM, SM and SL, GN branches for 8 minutes each GN branch and the temperature of the electrode tip was not raised.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Spain	Son Llatzer University Hospital	Palma	Balear Islands

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Hospital Son Llatzer

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Spain, 

References & Publications (14)

Bhatia A, Peng P, Cohen SP. Radiofrequency Procedures to Relieve Chronic Knee Pain: An Evidence-Based Narrative Review. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Jul-Aug;41(4):501-10. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000414. — View Citation

Choi WJ, Hwang SJ, Song JG, Leem JG, Kang YU, Park PH, Shin JW. Radiofrequency treatment relieves chronic knee osteoarthritis pain: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Pain. 2011 Mar;152(3):481-487. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.09.029. Epub 2010 Nov 4. — View Citation

Cosman ER Jr, Dolensky JR, Hoffman RA. Factors that affect radiofrequency heat lesion size. Pain Med. 2014 Dec;15(12):2020-36. doi: 10.1111/pme.12566. Epub 2014 Oct 14. — View Citation

Franco CD, Buvanendran A, Petersohn JD, Menzies RD, Menzies LP. Innervation of the Anterior Capsule of the Human Knee: Implications for Radiofrequency Ablation. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Jul-Aug;40(4):363-8. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000269. — View Citation

Ikeuchi M, Ushida T, Izumi M, Tani T. Percutaneous radiofrequency treatment for refractory anteromedial pain of osteoarthritic knees. Pain Med. 2011 Apr;12(4):546-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01086.x. Epub 2011 Apr 4. — View Citation

Kesikburun S, Yasar E, Uran A, Adiguzel E, Yilmaz B. Ultrasound-Guided Genicular Nerve Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment For Painful Knee Osteoarthritis: A Preliminary Report. Pain Physician. 2016 Jul;19(5):E751-9. — View Citation

Kvarstein G. A new target for radiofrequency neurotomy? Pain. 2011 Mar;152(3):465-466. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.09.037. Epub 2010 Oct 18. No abstract available. — View Citation

Lin ML, Lin MH, Fen JJ, Lin WT, Lin CW, Chen PQ. A comparison between pulsed radiofrequency and electro-acupuncture for relieving pain in patients with chronic low back pain. Acupunct Electrother Res. 2010;35(3-4):133-46. doi: 10.3727/036012910803860940. — View Citation

Manzano D, Jimenez F, Blasi M. Ultrasound-guided pain interventions in the knee region. Techniques in Regional Anesthesia and Pain Management. 2013;17:131-9.

Masala S, Fiori R, Raguso M, Morini M, Calabria E, Simonetti G. Pulse-dose radiofrequency for knee osteoartrithis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014 Apr;37(2):482-7. doi: 10.1007/s00270-013-0694-z. Epub 2013 Aug 14. — View Citation

Protzman NM, Gyi J, Malhotra AD, Kooch JE. Examining the feasibility of radiofrequency treatment for chronic knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. PM R. 2014 Apr;6(4):373-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.10.003. Epub 2013 Dec 27. — View Citation

Rubinstein SM, van Tulder M. A best-evidence review of diagnostic procedures for neck and low-back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2008 Jun;22(3):471-82. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2007.12.003. — View Citation

Vas L, Pai R, Khandagale N, Pattnaik M. Pulsed radiofrequency of the composite nerve supply to the knee joint as a new technique for relieving osteoarthritic pain: a preliminary report. Pain Physician. 2014 Nov-Dec;17(6):493-506. — View Citation

Yasar E, Kesikburun S, Kilic C, Guzelkucuk U, Yazar F, Tan AK. Accuracy of Ultrasound-Guided Genicular Nerve Block: A Cadaveric Study. Pain Physician. 2015 Sep-Oct;18(5):E899-904. — View Citation

* Note: There are 14 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Changes from baseline in visual analogue scale (VAS)	The VAS is a continuous scale made up of a 100-mm, unmarked, horizontal line, upon which the subject makes a hash mark depending on the amount of pain felt; a mark on the far left of the line indicates "no pain" (score of 0), and a mark to the far right qualifies as "pain as bad as it could be" or "unbearable pain" (score of 100).	baseline and the completion of treatment at 12 weeks
Secondary	Change from Baseline in Goldberg Depression and Anxiety scales	This consists of two subscales (of nine questions for each scale): an anxiety scale (1-9) and a depression scale (10-18). The first questions for each scale (1-4 and 10-13) are preconditioned questions to determine whether the patient should attempt to answer the rest of the questions of the two subscales. Effectively, at least two questions must be answered affirmatively in the first scale (1-4) for the patient to continue; in the second scale, one answer is sufficient for questions 10-13 for the patient to continue with the rest of the questions. This study will use the Spanish version validated by Montón et al.	at 1 month
Secondary	Change from Baseline in Goldberg Depression and Anxiety scales	This consists of two subscales (of nine questions for each scale): an anxiety scale (1-9) and a depression scale (10-18). The first questions for each scale (1-4 and 10-13) are preconditioned questions to determine whether the patient should attempt to answer the rest of the questions of the two subscales. Effectively, at least two questions must be answered affirmatively in the first scale (1-4) for the patient to continue; in the second scale, one answer is sufficient for questions 10-13 for the patient to continue with the rest of the questions. This study will use the Spanish version validated by Montón et al.	at 3 months
Secondary	Change from Baseline in Goldberg Depression and Anxiety scales	This consists of two subscales (of nine questions for each scale): an anxiety scale (1-9) and a depression scale (10-18). The first questions for each scale (1-4 and 10-13) are preconditioned questions to determine whether the patient should attempt to answer the rest of the questions of the two subscales. Effectively, at least two questions must be answered affirmatively in the first scale (1-4) for the patient to continue; in the second scale, one answer is sufficient for questions 10-13 for the patient to continue with the rest of the questions. This study will use the Spanish version validated by Montón et al.	at 6 months
Secondary	Change from Baseline in Goldberg Depression and Anxiety scales	This consists of two subscales (of nine questions for each scale): an anxiety scale (1-9) and a depression scale (10-18). The first questions for each scale (1-4 and 10-13) are preconditioned questions to determine whether the patient should attempt to answer the rest of the questions of the two subscales. Effectively, at least two questions must be answered affirmatively in the first scale (1-4) for the patient to continue; in the second scale, one answer is sufficient for questions 10-13 for the patient to continue with the rest of the questions. This study will use the Spanish version validated by Montón et al.	up to 1 year
Secondary	Change from baseline in WOMAC index	The WOMAC scale is used to evaluate the condition of patients with OA of the knee and the hip and includes pain, stiffness, and physical functioning of the joints. This scale measures five items for pain (with a score range of 0-20), two for stiffness (score range of 0-8), and 17 for functional limitation (score range of 0-68). The physical functioning questions cover everyday activities. These scales will be used separately and will not be summed. Patients will respond orally to the five levels with the following criteria: "none" = 0, "a bit" = 1, "quite a bit" = 2, "a lot" = 3, and "very much" = 4. If two or more questions are left unanswered, the scale will be declared invalid. If the patient does not respond to one question, a mean will be taken from the results of the other questions. The range will be 0-98.	at 1 month
Secondary	Change from baseline in WOMAC index	The WOMAC scale is used to evaluate the condition of patients with OA of the knee and the hip and includes pain, stiffness, and physical functioning of the joints. This scale measures five items for pain (with a score range of 0-20), two for stiffness (score range of 0-8), and 17 for functional limitation (score range of 0-68). The physical functioning questions cover everyday activities. These scales will be used separately and will not be summed. Patients will respond orally to the five levels with the following criteria: "none" = 0, "a bit" = 1, "quite a bit" = 2, "a lot" = 3, and "very much" = 4. If two or more questions are left unanswered, the scale will be declared invalid. If the patient does not respond to one question, a mean will be taken from the results of the other questions. The range will be 0-98.	at 3 months
Secondary	Change from baseline in WOMAC index	The WOMAC scale is used to evaluate the condition of patients with OA of the knee and the hip and includes pain, stiffness, and physical functioning of the joints. This scale measures five items for pain (with a score range of 0-20), two for stiffness (score range of 0-8), and 17 for functional limitation (score range of 0-68). The physical functioning questions cover everyday activities. These scales will be used separately and will not be summed. Patients will respond orally to the five levels with the following criteria: "none" = 0, "a bit" = 1, "quite a bit" = 2, "a lot" = 3, and "very much" = 4. If two or more questions are left unanswered, the scale will be declared invalid. If the patient does not respond to one question, a mean will be taken from the results of the other questions. The range will be 0-98.	at 6 months
Secondary	Change from baseline in WOMAC index	The WOMAC scale is used to evaluate the condition of patients with OA of the knee and the hip and includes pain, stiffness, and physical functioning of the joints. This scale measures five items for pain (with a score range of 0-20), two for stiffness (score range of 0-8), and 17 for functional limitation (score range of 0-68). The physical functioning questions cover everyday activities. These scales will be used separately and will not be summed. Patients will respond orally to the five levels with the following criteria: "none" = 0, "a bit" = 1, "quite a bit" = 2, "a lot" = 3, and "very much" = 4. If two or more questions are left unanswered, the scale will be declared invalid. If the patient does not respond to one question, a mean will be taken from the results of the other questions. The range will be 0-98.	up to 1 year
Secondary	EUROHIS (European Health Survey System) theoretical recommendations and design of a questionnaire Changes in baseline use of medication	This questionnaire will have four questions developed according the EUROHIS (European Health Interview Survey) recommendations in order to harmonize the information regarding medicine use [31]. Subjects will be asked (1) about the prescription medicine their general practitioner may have prescribed for them ("Have you taken any pain medicine prescribed by your general practitioner?") as well as any medication not prescribed by their general practitioner ("Have you taken any pain medicine not prescribed by your general practitioner") and (2) whether or not their prescribed and non-prescribed pain medication use has increased or decreased.	at 1 month
Secondary	EUROHIS (European Health Survey System) theoretical recommendations and design of a questionnaire Changes in baseline use of medication	This questionnaire will have four questions developed according the EUROHIS (European Health Interview Survey) recommendations in order to harmonize the information regarding medicine use [31]. Subjects will be asked (1) about the prescription medicine their general practitioner may have prescribed for them ("Have you taken any pain medicine prescribed by your general practitioner?") as well as any medication not prescribed by their general practitioner ("Have you taken any pain medicine not prescribed by your general practitioner") and (2) whether or not their prescribed and non-prescribed pain medication use has increased or decreased.	at 3 months
Secondary	EUROHIS (European Health Survey System) theoretical recommendations and design of a questionnaire Changes in baseline use of medication	This questionnaire will have four questions developed according the EUROHIS (European Health Interview Survey) recommendations in order to harmonize the information regarding medicine use [31]. Subjects will be asked (1) about the prescription medicine their general practitioner may have prescribed for them ("Have you taken any pain medicine prescribed by your general practitioner?") as well as any medication not prescribed by their general practitioner ("Have you taken any pain medicine not prescribed by your general practitioner") and (2) whether or not their prescribed and non-prescribed pain medication use has increased or decreased.	at 6 months
Secondary	EUROHIS (European Health Survey System) theoretical recommendations and design of a questionnaire Changes in baseline use of medication	This questionnaire will have four questions developed according the EUROHIS (European Health Interview Survey) recommendations in order to harmonize the information regarding medicine use [31]. Subjects will be asked (1) about the prescription medicine their general practitioner may have prescribed for them ("Have you taken any pain medicine prescribed by your general practitioner?") as well as any medication not prescribed by their general practitioner ("Have you taken any pain medicine not prescribed by your general practitioner") and (2) whether or not their prescribed and non-prescribed pain medication use has increased or decreased.	up to 1 year
Secondary	Change from baseline in a visual analogue scale (VAS)	The VAS is a continuous scale made up of a 100-mm, unmarked, horizontal line, upon which the subject makes a hash mark depending on the amount of pain felt; a mark on the far left of the line indicates "no pain" (score of 0), and a mark to the far right qualifies as "pain as bad as it could be" or "unbearable pain" (score of 100).	at 1 month
Secondary	Change from baseline in a visual analogue scale (VAS)	The VAS is a continuous scale made up of a 100-mm, unmarked, horizontal line, upon which the subject makes a hash mark depending on the amount of pain felt; a mark on the far left of the line indicates "no pain" (score of 0), and a mark to the far right qualifies as "pain as bad as it could be" or "unbearable pain" (score of 100).	at 6 months
Secondary	Change from baseline in a visual analogue scale (VAS)	The VAS is a continuous scale made up of a 100-mm, unmarked, horizontal line, upon which the subject makes a hash mark depending on the amount of pain felt; a mark on the far left of the line indicates "no pain" (score of 0), and a mark to the far right qualifies as "pain as bad as it could be" or "unbearable pain" (score of 100).	up to 1 year