Clinical Trials Logo

Osteo Arthritis Knee clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Osteo Arthritis Knee.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT04238143 Recruiting - Osteoarthritis Clinical Trials

Adipose-Derived Biocellular Regenerative Therapy for Osteoarthritis

GARM-MSK-ALD
Start date: January 10, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Use of Biocellular and cellular approaches to treatment of Osteoarthritis (OA), musculoskeletal aging processes, pain, and degenerative changes are to be studied with minimally invasive protocols, and non-pharmaceutical means to relieve OA and its associated issues. Traditional surgical interventions have not yielded convincing long-term outcomes, including total joint replacement surgeries and medical management of the supportive structures. This study is to use a person's own stem/stromal Cells (autologous) plus HD-PRP (important healing growth factors and signal molecules) in such cases of OA for long-term minimally invasive treatments. Baseline (existing) findings are documented, and thence tracked as to progress deemed to be result of the intervention.

NCT ID: NCT04183933 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Osteo Arthritis Knee

The Effect of Exercise Training on Balance and Functional Status in Individuals With Osteoarthritis'

Start date: December 9, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effects of Clinical Pilates Exercise Training and Combined Exercise Training on balance and functional status in individuals with knee Osteoarthritis (OA).

NCT ID: NCT04155983 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Osteo Arthritis Knee

High Versus Low Adductor Canal Block

Start date: March 11, 2020
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

The investigators will be comparing the efficacy of two different techniques for performing an adductor canal block to the saphenous nerve as a part of the multimodal pain control regimen for total knee arthroplasty. The investigators will be comparing a "low adductor canal block" in which the surgeon administers local anesthetic to the distal aspect of the nerve from the operative site to a "high adductor canal block" in which the anesthesiologist administers the local anesthetic more proximally along the thigh using ultrasound guidance. The investigators will power the study for non-inferiority to compare the newer "low" block to the more commonly performed and more widely studied "high" block.

NCT ID: NCT04099394 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Osteo Arthritis Knee

Pain & Aging: Combined Interventions for Fitness in the Community Study

PACIFIC
Start date: October 30, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This clinical trial will determine the added benefit of combining exercise and behavioral health education (versus exercise and aging and health education) to improve physical activity in community-dwelling older adults who have painful knee osteoarthritis (OA).

NCT ID: NCT04095637 Recruiting - Surgery Clinical Trials

RCT: Mako Medial Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty vs Oxford Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty

Start date: November 24, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The overall aim of this prospective, randomised, single-blinded, controlled trial is to compare clinical outcomes and accuracy of implant positioning in Mako robotic UKA versus jig-based Oxford UKA with navigation control. Patients receiving the Mako robotic UKA (Stryker Ltd) will form the investigation group and those undergoing the jig-based Oxford UKA (Zimmer-Biomet Ltd) with navigation control will form the control group. The primary objective in this study is to compare accuracy of component positioning as assessed by postoperative low radiation dose CT scan between conventional Jig-based Oxford UKA with navigation control and Mako robotic UKA.

NCT ID: NCT04092153 Recruiting - Surgery Clinical Trials

Mako Functionally Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty vs Mako Mechanically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty

Start date: December 28, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study evaluates outcomes of robotic-arm assisted mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty [MA TKA] versus robotic-arm assisted functionally aligned total knee arthroplasty [FA TKA]. Half the study will receive MA TKA and half will receive FA TKA.

NCT ID: NCT03940950 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Osteo Arthritis Knee

Intra-articular Transplantation of Autologous Adipose Derived Stromal Vascular Faction (SVF) for Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Knee

Start date: July 2, 2019
Phase: Phase 1
Study type: Interventional

Researchers are trying to determine the safety and feasibility of autologous, adipose derived stromal vascular fraction injections in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis

NCT ID: NCT03681613 Recruiting - Osteoarthritis Clinical Trials

Exercise Therapy in Combination With Central Nervous System-targeted Treatment for Osteoarthritis

Start date: January 7, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The aim of this study is to investigate if exercise therapy comprising the NEMEX program in combination with a CNS-targeted treatment using GMI and SDT is superior to exercise therapy alone in improving self-reported pain, function, quality of life and objective measures related to hyperexcitability of the CNS (e.g. central sensitization) in people with KOA.

NCT ID: NCT03503825 Recruiting - Healthy Clinical Trials

[Tc-99m]-RPI-087 as an Imaging Marker in Osteoarthritis of the Knee Compared to Healthy Volunteers

Start date: August 16, 2018
Phase: Phase 1
Study type: Interventional

The main purpose of this study is to test the safety and tolerability of T-087. The study will enroll 6 healthy volunteers (HVs) and 6-18 subjects with KOA. All eligible subjects will receive an intravenous injection of the radioactive investigational product (ip) (T-087), followed by SPECT/CT imaging of the knees and blood tests and clinical assessments for safety monitoring. Healthy volunteers will also have their whole body imaged and have extra blood drawn to determine where T-087 goes in the body. These additional procedures will be done on the same day as the ip administration, and repeated the following day. All subjects will have a final follow-up phone call within 2- 3 business days following the ip administration.

NCT ID: NCT03196011 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Osteo Arthritis Knee

Traditional Versus Alternative Alignment in TKR

Start date: October 23, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

As many as 20% of patients are unhappy with the results of total knee replacement (TKR). Various changes to surgical technique have tried to address this but have not led to a significant improvement in the numbers of patients satisfied with their operation. Recently, attention has focussed on alignment of the leg. When viewed from the front, a number of people do not start with a straight, mechanically aligned leg. Traditionally, when implanting a knee replacement, the surgeon tries to put the shin bone half of the knee replacement perpendicular to the floor to equalise stresses on the in and outside of the joint. However, this may result in the alignment of the leg changing considerably, straining the soft tissues around the knee and contributing to dissatisfaction with TKR. There has been a move by some surgeons to change practice, and to implant the TKR in a way that replicates the alignment of the patient's own original knee- alternative alignment. Studies looking at alternative alignment have not shown any loss of satisfaction with results of TKR and indeed are showing some signs that in the short term, function of the knee may be better with the new technique. The research team are planning to run a study comparing the knee replacement used in Exeter- the Triathlon- when put in place using traditional alignment versus using the alternative alignment methods. The outcomes will be assessed in various ways including patient satisfaction questionnaires, measuring muscle strength, flexibility around the knee, and by assessments of alignment of the new knee on X-rays and Computerised Tomography scans. The research team will look at short term results for satisfaction and function of the knee, and in the long term look at wear and survivorship to see if patient satisfaction with TKR can be improved.