View clinical trials related to Opioid Dependence.
Filter by:Pain is very common in persons with a history of addiction, but few studies have examined the best treatment of pain in this population. This is a study to determine the pain relief provided by intravenous hydromorphone (Dilaudid) or buprenorphine given to persons maintained on stable doses of methadone or buprenorphine. Experimental sessions will require overnight stays on a residential research unit. In these sessions, persons will be exposed to standard experimental pain techniques at baseline and then rate the relief (if any) provided by the study medication when exposed to the same techniques. Persons will be asked to participate in 2 or 3 sessions, each separated by at least 7 days.
The purpose of the study is to conduct a follow-up of substance abuse patients (n=1,269) about 2 to 5 years since they were originally recruited from 8 substance abuse treatment clinics (located in 5 states) to participate in a prior clinical trial study called "START" (Starting Treatment with Agonist Replacement Therapies). The START Follow-up Study will be conducted over 5 years and will involve three follow-up interviews with START participants. The specific aims of the START Follow-up Study are as follows. 1. To determine longer-term outcomes of Suboxone versus methadone treatment received in the START 2. To investigate patient and treatment factors associated with post-START treatment access, utilization, and outcomes among Suboxone and methadone patients 3. To explore other correlates of the long-term outcomes among START patients.
The purpose of this study is to explore whether frontal brain activation in response to stress varies as a function of the presence or extent of early trauma and whether or not this effect is greater in women compared to men. To examine the effect of stress on thinking and remembering. To examine the separate and interactive effects of stress, addiction, withdrawal, and genetics; and to examine fMRI brain activation associated with stressful, reward-related-cue and neutral/relaxing audiotaped scripts,visual images and emotional video clips in addicted individuals and in healthy controls.
The primary objective of this study is to assess QTc (an interval of the heart rhythm) interaction effects between lofexidine and methadone. The secondary objectives of the study are to evaluate the safety and tolerability of lofexidine by evaluating and monitoring pharmacokinetics (amounts of drug in the blood), vital signs (heart rate and blood pressure) and adverse events (side effects) when co-administered with methadone; and to describe effects on opiate withdrawal when lofexidine is introduced following a 50% or 100% methadone dose reduction, as required to elicit a withdrawal response. The investigators hypothesize that while both agents are known to prolong the QTc interval, the combination of the drugs will not create an additive effect which creates a significant safety concern. The investigators further hypothesize that subjects will be able to tolerate the therapeutic dose of lofexidine (0.8 mg four times daily) when the methadone maintenance dose is lowered to elicit withdrawal.
In this 5-year study, the investigators propose to evaluate the separate and combined effects of the FDA-approved formulation of extended release naltrexone (Vivitrol®) and employment-based reinforcement of opiate abstinence in promoting opiate abstinence and reducing risky injection behavior in recently detoxified, opioid-dependent, injection drug users.
The investigators propose that inability to tolerate the distress of opioid withdrawal and the negative affect associated with early abstinence are key factors in early illicit opioid lapse and subsequent buprenorphine treatment drop-out. Our intervention aimed at increasing distress tolerance is designed to increase treatment adherence.
Current treatments for opioid addiction would benefit by the addition of a non-opioid based treatment medication. Recent behavioral studies have shown that the neurokinin-1 (NK1) receptor is involved in opioid reward and withdrawal. This study proposes to study a potential non-opioid treatment, the clinically available, FDA approved, NK1 antagonist aprepitant, in opioid addicted patients. Based on the unique behavioral and pharmacological characteristics of opioid addiction, and what is known of the currently employed treatments, the investigators propose that the therapeutic mechanism of any potential opioid addiction treatment medication must include the ability to reduce opioid withdrawal. This is of particular importance during treatment initiation (eg. detoxification). In addition, for long-term treatment and relapse prevention, it is important to manage drug craving and inhibit the rewarding effects of opioids if patients do experience a slip. Therefore, the investigators propose to study aprepitant using human models of opioid withdrawal, craving and acute opioid reward and reinforcement. The investigators will also include a neuro-economics choice procedure paradigm.
This phase 4 study will evaluate the feasibility of initiating subjects on VIVITROL in prison and continuing VIVITROL upon release into the community.
The purpose of this study, SALOME, is to determine if 1) the closely supervised provision of injectable, hydromorphone (HDM; trade name Dilaudid™) is as effective as injectable diacetylmorphine (DAM; heroin) in the treatment of chronic, multi-morbid opioid-dependent individuals who have not benefited sufficiently from conventional treatments, and if a switch to the oral equivalent of hydromorphone and diacetylmorphine is as effective as the injection form. The availability of an effective, licensed opioid medication such as hydromorphone, for substitution treatment of chronic, multi-morbid treatment-refractory opioid-dependent individuals, would be of immense impact locally and internationally. It could help to establish alternative treatment options where for non-medical reasons Heroin Assisted Treatment would not be acceptable. Thus, one result could be the expansion of treatment options for the most difficult to treat heroin dependent persons. This would also be an important step for secondary prevention of HIV and Hepatitis C as well as a better integration of those patients in other medical treatments. Switching from intravenous to oral application would also reduce a lot of potential risk factors (like overdose, seizures, infections, etc) and side effects associated with the injection route. Additionally it could make these treatments more feasible in normal treatment settings, like existing methadone services.
The objective of this proposal is to explore the potential of varenicline as a pharmacotherapeutic agent for opioid dependence and addiction.