View clinical trials related to Oncology.
Filter by:Stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is curable and surgery is considered the standard of care for fit, good performance status patients. However, a high proportion of patients with stage 1 NSCLC are elderly and/or have medical co-morbidities and are therefore at higher risk of surgical complications. The optimal treatment for these patients is unknown. SABR may be an equally appropriate treatment but this need to be formally assessed. Funded by the NIHR Research for Patient Benefit, SABRtooth is a UK multi-centre, two-group individually randomised controlled feasibility study of patients with peripheral stage I non-small cell lung cancer considered at higher risk from surgery. In total, 54 patients are planned to be recruited from 4 treatment sites and 2 referral sites. This study aims to determine the feasibility and acceptability of performing a largescale definitive randomised phase III trial comparing surgery with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). The qualitative substudy is an exploration of the reasons for nonparticipation in the SABRTooth trial. As the two treatments are very different, patients may have a strong preference for either surgery or SABR, or may feel uncomfortable to have a decision between such distinct options taken out of their hands. Understanding why patients choose not to participate or do not take up their treatment allocation will be crucial in demonstrating that recruiting to a larger scale phase III trial is feasible. We will explore what patients, who have declined particpation in the study or who intiailly consented but subsequently fail to take up their randomimsed treatment arm, understand, perceive and feel about, how the SABRTooth trial was presented to them and their expectations of study burden.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of entospletinib (ENTO) and/or its metabolites (if applicable) in participants with impaired hepatic function (stratified by smoking status, as appropriate) relative to matched, healthy controls.
The Sponsor is developing the study drug, AZD9291, for the potential treatment of nonsmall cell lung cancer. Lung cancer has been the most common cancer in the world for several decades and represents 12.8% of all new cancer cases in 2008. The purpose of this study is to see how much AZD9291 is taken up by the body when dosed by mouth (tablet) compared to when the study drug is dosed once by injection directly into the vein (intravenously). The dose given directly into the vein will be radiolabelled. This means that the test drug has a radioactive component which helps us to track where the drug is in the body. This allows us to detect the differences between the tablet and the intravenous dose. The study will be performed in 12 healthy male subjects aged 18-65 years. On Day 1, subjects will be dosed with a single oral dose of 80 milligrams AZD9291 tablet followed by 100 micrograms [14C] AZD9291 dosed as an intravenous microdose beginning 5 hours and 45 minutes after the oral dose has been administered. Subjects will remain in the study centre until after the 120 hour post-dose blood sample is obtained and will return to the clinic for further visits on Day 8, 10, 15 and 22 for pharmacokinetic and safety assessments.
The purpose of this observational study is to determine the proportion of patients with a score greater than 3/10 to the questionnaire PALLIA-10. This questionnaire is a tool provided by the French Society for Palliative Cares, aiming at helping the providers of care to identify patients who would require palliative cares. According to the notice of the questionnaire, patients with a score greater than 3 would be taken in charge by a palliative care team. Considerong the 10 itmes of this questionnaire, it seems that a large majority of patients would have a score greater than 3 in the context of anti cancer centers. To date, palliative teams are not designed to take in charge such an amount of patients.
The primary objective of this study is to define the pharmacokinetic of Regorafenib administered orally as a single agent in Chinese patients with advance solid tumors. The second objective include the evaluation of safety, tolerability, and efficacy of Chinese patents treated with Regorafenib
Phase 1b/2a, open-label, sequential dose escalation and expansion study of AMG 232 in combination with trametinib and dabrafenib in subjects with metastatic melanoma followed by a direct comparison of AMG 232 combined with trametinib and dabrafenib versus trametinib combined with dabrafenib alone.
Open-label, sequential dose escalation and expansion study of AMG 232 in subjects with acute myeloid leukemia.
This is a 3 part phase 1 study to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetic and oral bioavailability of veliparib in subjects with solid tumors.
First in human, open-label, sequential dose escalation and expansion study of AMG 232 in subjects with advanced solid tumors or multiple myeloma
First in human, open-label, sequential dose escalation and expansion study of AMG 820 in subjects with advanced solid tumors.