Ocular Inflammation and Pain Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Masked, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of APP13007 for the Treatment of Inflammation and Pain After Cataract Surgery
Verified date | July 2023 |
Source | Formosa Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This Phase 3 study will evaluate APP13007 in comparison to the matching vehicle placebo in a randomized, parallel-group, double-masked fashion. The subjects will have undergone routine cataract surgery on Day 0 of the study and will be assessed the next day (Post-operative Day 1; POD1) after uncomplicated surgery for eligibility for randomization to study treatment.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 378 |
Est. completion date | March 17, 2022 |
Est. primary completion date | March 17, 2022 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Patients 18 years of age or older expected to undergo unilateral uncomplicated cataract extraction via phacoemulsification and posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation in one eye. - Have a pin-hole corrected visual acuity without other correction of = 1.3 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) in the study eye to be operated and contralateral eye as measured using an Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at Visit 1. - Willing and able to comply with study requirements and visit schedule. - Provide signed and dated informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: - Have a known sensitivity or allergy to clobetasol propionate, corticosteroids, or any of the study medication's components including benzalkonium chloride and soybean lecithin or any routine medication required during cataract surgery or for the conduct of study procedures - Have an ACC count > 0 or any evidence of intraocular inflammation (e.g., flare) in either eye at the Screening visit - Have a Grade > 0 on the Ocular Pain Assessment in either eye at the Screening visit Note: Other inclusion/exclusion criteria apply. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Puerto Rico | Centro Oftalmologico Metropolitano | San Juan | |
United States | Keystone Research Ltd. | Austin | Texas |
United States | Retina Research Center, PLLC | Austin | Texas |
United States | Midwest Cornea Associates, LLC | Carmel | Indiana |
United States | Eye Physicians, LLC | Columbus | Ohio |
United States | Jacksoneye SC | Columbus | Illinois |
United States | Global Research Management | Glendale | California |
United States | Icon Eye Care | Grand Junction | Colorado |
United States | Inland Eye Specialists | Hemet | California |
United States | NV Eye Surgery | Henderson | Nevada |
United States | Advanced Laser Vision and Surgical Institute | Houston | Texas |
United States | Houston Eye Associates | Houston | Texas |
United States | Levenson Eye Associates | Jacksonville | Florida |
United States | Silverstein Eye Centers, PC | Kansas City | Missouri |
United States | Lake Travis Eye and Laser Center | Lakeway | Texas |
United States | Center For Sight | Las Vegas | Nevada |
United States | SoCal Eye Physicians and Associates | Long Beach | California |
United States | Senior Health Services | Louisville | Kentucky |
United States | North Valley Eye Medical Group, Inc. | Mission Hills | California |
United States | LoBue Laser and Eye Medical Center, Inc. | Murrieta | California |
United States | Raymond Fong, MD, PC | New York | New York |
United States | Pendleton Eye Center | Oceanside | California |
United States | International Eye Associates, PA | Ormond Beach | Florida |
United States | Martel Eye Medical Group | Rancho Cordova | California |
United States | Shasta Eye Medical Group, Inc. | Redding | California |
United States | Coastal Research Associates, LLC | Roswell | Georgia |
United States | Ophthalmology Consultants, Ltd. | Saint Louis | Missouri |
United States | Stacy R. Smith, MD, PC | Salt Lake City | Utah |
United States | R and R Eye Research, LLC | San Antonio | Texas |
United States | San Antonio Eye Center | San Antonio | Texas |
United States | Schwartz Laser Eye Center | Scottsdale | Arizona |
United States | Newsom Eye and Laser Center | Sebring | Florida |
United States | Carolina Eye Associates | Southern Pines | North Carolina |
United States | Comprehensive Eye Care, Ltd. | Washington | Missouri |
United States | Bucci Laser Vision Institute | Wilkes-Barre | Pennsylvania |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Formosa Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
United States, Puerto Rico,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Participants With ACC Count = 0 at All Visits From Postoperative Day 8 Through Postoperative Day 15 Without Rescue Medication | The number of cells in the anterior chamber of the eye are counted using slit-lamp biomicroscopy at each study visit and the results are reported as number of cells in a 1mm x 1mm area. | Postoperative Day 8 and Postoperative Day 15 | |
Primary | Participants With Ocular Pain Grade = 0 at All Visits From Postoperative Day 4 Through Postoperative Day 15 Without Rescue Medication | Ocular pain is measured in each eye using a subject-reported five-point (0-4) ocular pain grade scale (0 = no pain; 1 = minimal; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe pain). | Postoperative Day 4, Postoperative Day 8 and Postoperative Day 15 | |
Primary | Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs) | Number of participants with ocular and systemic treatment-emergent AEs. | From First dose to Postoperative Day 22 | |
Secondary | Participants With Anterior Chamber Cell Grade = 0 at POD8 Without Rescue Medication | The number of cells in the anterior chamber of the eye are counted using slit-lamp biomicroscopy at each study visit and the results are reported as number of cells in a 1mm x 1mm area. ACC Grade 0 = 0 cells, ACC grade 1 = 1-5 cells, ACC grade 2 = 6-15 cells, ACC grade 3 = 16-30 cells, ACC grade 4 = >30 cells | Postoperative Day 8 | |
Secondary | Participants With Anterior Chamber Cell Grade = 0 at POD15 Without Rescue Medication | The number of cells in the anterior chamber of the eye are counted using slit-lamp biomicroscopy at each study visit and the results are reported as number of cells in a 1mm x 1mm area. ACC Grade 0 = 0 cells, ACC grade 1 = 1-5 cells, ACC grade 2 = 6-15 cells, ACC grade 3 = 16-30 cells, ACC grade 4 = >30 cells | Postoperative Day 15 | |
Secondary | Participants With Ocular Pain Grade = 0 at POD4 Without Rescue Medication | Ocular pain is measured in each eye using a subject-reported five-point (0-4) ocular pain grade scale (0 = no pain; 4 = severe pain). | Postoperative Day 4 | |
Secondary | Participants With Ocular Pain Grade = 0 at POD8 Without Rescue Medication | Ocular pain is measured in each eye using a subject-reported five-point (0-4) ocular pain grade scale (0 = no pain; 4 = severe pain). | Postoperative Day 8 | |
Secondary | Participants With Ocular Pain Grade = 0 at POD15 Without Rescue Medication | Ocular pain is measured in each eye using a subject-reported five-point (0-4) ocular pain grade scale (0 = no pain; 4 = severe pain). | Postoperative Day 15 | |
Secondary | Participants With Anterior Chamber Flare (ACF) = 0 at POD4 Without Rescue Medication | The degree of turbidity (flare) in the anterior chamber of the eye is measured using slit-lamp biomicroscopy and quantified on a five-point (0-4) anterior chamber flare grade scale (0 = none; 4 = Intense). | Postoperative Day 4 | |
Secondary | Participants With Anterior Chamber Flare (ACF) = 0 at POD8 Without Rescue Medication | The degree of turbidity (flare) in the anterior chamber of the eye is measured using slit-lamp biomicroscopy and quantified on a five-point (0-4) anterior chamber flare grade scale (0 = none; 4 = Intense). | Postoperative Day 8 | |
Secondary | Participants With Anterior Chamber Flare (ACF) = 0 at POD15 Without Rescue Medication | The degree of turbidity (flare) in the anterior chamber of the eye is measured using slit-lamp biomicroscopy and quantified on a five-point (0-4) anterior chamber flare grade scale (0 = none; 4 = Intense). | Postoperative Day 15 | |
Secondary | Anterior Chamber Cell Grade - Change From Baseline (POD1 Prior to Dosing) to POD 15 | The number of cells in the anterior chamber of the eye are counted using slit-lamp biomicroscopy and the results are reported as number of cells in a 1mm x 1mm area using a 5 point grading scale. ACC Grade 0 = 0 cells, ACC grade 1 = 1-5 cells, ACC grade 2 = 6-15 cells, ACC grade 3 = 16-30 cells, ACC grade 4 = >30 cells | Baseline and Postoperative Day 15 | |
Secondary | Ocular Pain Grade - Change From Baseline (POD1 Prior to Dosing) to POD 15 | Ocular pain is measured in each eye using a subject-reported five-point (0-4) ocular pain grade scale (0 = no pain; 4 = severe pain). | Baseline and Postoperative Day 15 | |
Secondary | Anterior Chamber Flare (ACF) - Change From Baseline (POD1 Prior to Dosing) to POD 15 | The degree of turbidity (flare) in the anterior chamber of the eye is measured using slit-lamp biomicroscopy and quantified on a five-point (0-4) anterior chamber flare grade scale (0 = none; 4 = Intense). | Baseline and Postoperative Day 15 | |
Secondary | Best Corrected Visual Acuity - Change From Baseline (POD1 Prior to Dosing) to POD4 | The visual acuity in each eye is corrected using the pinhole method and the acuity is quantified on a logMAR (minimal angle of resolution) scale using the 'Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study' [ETDRS] charts for right and left eyes.
A logMAR Score is calculated using the letter row on the chart and the number of incorrect letters read by the participant. |
Baseline and Postoperative Day 4 | |
Secondary | Best Corrected Visual Acuity - Change From Baseline (POD1 Prior to Dosing) to POD8 | The visual acuity in each eye is corrected using the pinhole method and the acuity is quantified on a logMAR (minimal angle of resolution) scale using the 'Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study' [ETDRS] charts for right and left eyes. A logMAR Score is calculated using the letter row on the chart and the number of incorrect letters read by the participant. | Baseline and Postoperative Day 8 | |
Secondary | Best Corrected Visual Acuity - Change From Baseline (POD1 Prior to Dosing) to POD15 | The visual acuity in each eye is corrected using the pinhole method and the acuity is quantified on a logMAR (minimal angle of resolution) scale using the 'Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study' [ETDRS] charts for right and left eyes. A logMAR Score is calculated using the letter row on the chart and the number of incorrect letters read by the participant. | Baseline and Postoperative Day 15 | |
Secondary | Participants Using of Anti-inflammatory 'Rescue' Medication Through End-of-Treatment | Participants who do not respond to study treatment after randomization are started on anti-inflammatory medication (referred to as 'Rescue' medication). The number of subjects starting 'Rescue' medication is recorded at each study visit | First dose to Postoperative Day 15 |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT01666210 -
Phase II Study Evaluating Safety/Efficacy of OTX-DP for Treatment of Ocular Inflammation and Pain After Cataract Surgery
|
Phase 2 |