Obstructive Sleep Apnea Clinical Trial
Official title:
PROXIMO: A Cohort Study to Investigate the Incidence of Obstructive Sleep Apnoea Using Prolonged Overnight Oximetry in an Unselected Population Referred to Secondary Care Reporting Excessive Daytime Sleepiness
This study is looking at the way in which patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) are
diagnosed. The investigators current practice is to offer patients who are referred to the
sleep centre with possible sleep apnoea a single night's oximetry recording. A decision is
then made based on this screening test as to whether the patient has OSA, does not have OSA
or requires a further investigation. There can be significant variation in the severity of
OSA between nights. This study is designed to investigate if recording data from multiple
nights will give any better indication on the presence and severity of obstructive sleep
apnoea. Patients referred for overnight oximetry recordings that report excessive daytime
sleepiness are eligible to enter the trial.
On enrolment participants will all undergo a single night recording with the oximetry device
currently in use by the recruiting sleep centre. In addition they will be asked to wear the
prolonged recording oximeter (PRO) that allows for multiple nights data to be stored, and
continue wearing this for a total of four nights. On returning both oximetry devices, this
data will then be analysed and if it demonstrates evidence of OSA participants will return to
the standard clinical pathway and be offered a trial of treatment with continuous positive
airway pressure (CPAP) therapy.
If no evidence of OSA is seen participants will also revert back to the standard clinical
pathway, which may involve a further inpatient sleep investigation being arranged.
The number of patients identified as having OSA based on the single first night recording
will be compared to those identified as having OSA only after the additional nights
recording.
All participants will return to the current standard pathway of care on leaving the trial.
Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a common condition, effecting an estimated 1.5 million
people in the UK and it is believed up to 80% of them may be undiagnosed [1]. During sleep
the muscles supporting the upper airway tend to relax and the throat narrows. In patients
with OSA the narrowing leads to collapse and pauses in breathing. These pauses in breathing
are accompanied by a decrease in arterial oxygen saturation and to overcome the airway
collapse the body responds by producing a surge in the sympathetic nervous system. This has
the effect of stimulating the pharyngeal muscles to reopen the throat but also causes an
increase in heart rate, blood pressure and disrupts the sleep cycle waking the patient up.
These repeated disruptions to sleep leads to the patient feeling unrefreshed by sleep,
excessively sleepy during the day and at increased risk of a sleepiness-related accident. The
repetitive surges in the sympathetic nervous system also contributes to the risk of long term
cardiovascular disease. The frequency with which these events occur determines the severity
of obstructive sleep apnoea, less than 5 events per hour is considered normal, 5-15 mild,
15-30 moderate and more than 30 severe disease. However the disease severity does not
correlate with the degree of symptoms [2] meaning it is important to identify patients even
if they have mild and moderate disease.
OSA is effectively treated with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. These
machines blow air into the throat through a nose or face mask. This helps to splint the
airway open and reduce the disruption to sleep. CPAP is an effective therapy improving
sleepiness, snoring, mood and reduces the long term risk of cardiovascular disease seen in
untreated patients with OSA.
Full inpatient polysomnography testing is the gold standard investigation for diagnosis and
exclusion of OSA [3]. However because polysomnography generally requires a hospital bed,
significant technical input to set up and is time intensive to report it is impractical for
the large numbers of patients referred to sleep services to undergo this test. Overnight
oximetry recording has been established as an effective alternative for screening patients
and identifying OSA in many sleep centres [4-6].
For a single test to be effective it needs to be highly sensitive and the condition being
investigated should be stable. However significant variation in the severity of obstructive
sleep apnoea has been demonstrated from night to night in individual patients [7, 8].
Therefore using oximetry or even polysomnography recording for a single night may not truly
reflect the overall condition. Patients with mild and moderate disease show the most
significant variations on a night to night basis, as the oxygen desaturation index (ODI,
number of times the oxygen saturations dip per hour) rises, i.e. more severe OSA, less night
to night variability is observed [9]. When patients with previously diagnosed OSA are
withdrawn from CPAP treatment and overnight oximetry performed for two weeks only 22% of
participants consistently remain within one severity category. The majority of these patients
were in the severe category. Other studies have shown 40-50% of patients changing severity
category in two to four nights recordings [7, 10] and that 16-20% of patients would not have
received CPAP treatment based on a single night study but did so after repeating between one
to three studies [10, 11].
The most clinically relevant distinction to make is between no OSA and mild and moderate OSA
as this determines whether a trial of CPAP therapy would be offered. These previous trials
suggest it is within this milder spectrum of the disease where a single night's oximetry
recording is least reliable and more than one night's recording may be required.
Despite CPAP being a very successful treatment for OSA, adherence rates to treatment are
variable [12, 13]. It has also be shown that adherence correlates with OSA severity [14]. In
part this poor adherence to treatment suggests imperfect identification of patients. The
investigators hypothesise that the current oximetry screening of a single night may not be
effectively identifying all those patients who may benefit from CPAP. The investigators aim
to identify how many additional patients are identified as having OSA with prolonged,
multi-night recordings. A longer period of oximetry recording may improve the identification
of those patients who may benefit from CPAP and may help to identify factors that predict a
poorer response to CPAP therapy. Therefore this study will follow-up patients to see if those
identified by prolonged oximetry screening tests leads to improved adherence to CPAP.
Two different oximeters are used in this study. The Minolta i300 was chosen as it is the
current device used within the investigators clinical service. This is not being used for
prolonged recordings as the battery life makes it impractical to be used for more than two
nights recording. Therefore the CheckMeO2 oximeter was chosen; this has a rechargeable
battery and sufficient memory capacity to be used for the required 4 nights of recording.
The CheckMe O2 device records oxygen saturations to nearest whole number every 4 seconds
versus the Minolta device recording to one decimal place every second. It is felt that as the
average length of a desaturation in obstructive sleep apnoea is 15-20 seconds the CheckMe O2
device should be sufficiently accurate to detect OSA but by performing a simultaneous
recording during the first night the investigators hope to establish if this frequency of
recording is sufficient.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT05857384 -
Bioavailability, Bioequivalence and Tolerability of IHL-42X Compared to the Reference Drugs
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04547543 -
Follow-up of Apneic Patients by Visio-consultation
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05371509 -
Novel Myofunctional Water Bottle to Reduce OSA and Snoring Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02515357 -
Mediterranean Diet/Lifestyle Intervention in Obstructive Sleep Apnea
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05582070 -
Effect on Sleep of Surgical Treatment of Severe Nasal Obstruction
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03189173 -
Combined Upper-airway and Breathing Control Therapies for Obstructive Sleep Apnea
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04084899 -
The Effect of CPAP on Lung Hyperinflation in Patients With OSA
|
||
Completed |
NCT03032029 -
Registry on the Treatment of Central and Complex Sleep-Disordered Breathing With Adaptive Servo-Ventilation
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04028011 -
Clinical Evaluation of a Wearable Technology for the Diagnosis of Sleep Apnoea
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT06047353 -
Community Health Advocates for Motivating PAP Use in Our Neighborhoods.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05253963 -
Acute Effect of CPAP on Weight in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06029959 -
Stroke and CPAP Outcome Study 3
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06150352 -
Sleep Apnea, Neurocognitive Decline and Brain Imaging in Patients With Subjective or Mild Cognitive Impairment
|
||
Completed |
NCT03589417 -
Postural Stability, Balance and Fall Risk in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04335994 -
ENhancing Outcomes in Cognitive Impairment Through Use of Home Sleep ApNea Testing
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT04063436 -
Evaluation of a New Nasal Pillows Mask for the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05385302 -
Sociological Determinants of Positive Airway Pressure Adherence in OSA Patients
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04572269 -
Metabolomics of Obstructive Sleep Apnea
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06467682 -
12-week Tele-exercise Program in Patients With OSA
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT04011358 -
Retinal Vein Occlusion and Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Case Control Study
|
N/A |