Adherence and Preference of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Versus Mandibular Advancement Splints in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients: A Randomized Trial — CHOICE  

Obstructive Sleep Apnea Clinical Trial

Official title: Adherence and Preference of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Versus Mandibular Advancement Splints in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients: A Randomized Trial

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a major health problem affecting over 1,000,000 Canadians. It is the cause of significant healthcare costs with increased morbidity and mortality. The two most common and effective therapies used to treat OSA are: (1) Continuous or Automatic Positive Airway Pressure (PAP), and (2) Mandibular Advancement Splints (MAS). While both therapies reduce upper airway collapse during sleep, they differ in efficacy, acceptance, cost and side-effects, but surprisingly are similar in improving quality of life, sleepiness and blood pressure. PAP is more effective in reducing apneas while MAS is easier to use. Until now, studies have used self-reported adherence data on MAS versus objective adherence on PAP. Many studies have hypothesized that the sub-optimal efficacy with MAS therapy is counterbalanced by the superior adherence relative to PAP, resulting in a similar effectiveness for both treatments. Compliance smart chips are a recent innovation for MAS and could be used to prove this hypothesis and allow a new and complete comparison of effectiveness (efficacy + adherence) between MAS and PAP. Understanding the patient's objective adherence and long-term symptomatic improvement would provide vital information to doctors and dentists in choosing the right treatment for patients. Sixty OSA patients will receive both PAP and MAS in a random sequence. This innovative study lead by two experienced new investigators, and a research team of multidisciplinary experts, will assess objective adherence, treatment efficacy, patient preference, sleepiness and quality of life of each treatment used at home for 1 month per treatment. After this, patients will be able to go back and forth between both treatments during an additional 6-month period. The results of this study will be used by healthcare policy makers as well as clinicians who need to be part of the treatment plan decision for the many Canadians who suffer from sleep apnea.

Clinical Trial Description

The primary aim of this study is to assess objective adherence to treatment, for PAP and MAS, and to evaluate if there will be similar effectiveness (efficacy+adherence) between PAP and MAS treatment for patients with mild to severe OSA. The secondary aim is to assess if patient preference does correlate to the final treatment adherence. An exploratory aim is to assess if the strategy of patients having both treatments available to use interchangeably could further improve treatment adherence, sleepiness, quality of life and fatigue. Having a better insight into patient adherence will improve the cost-effectiveness of treatment and will improve the health and quality of life for many Canadians who suffer from sleep apnea.

The proposed trial is a randomized open-label, two-treatment, two-period cross-over trial followed by an observational trial. Sixty OSA patients (10≤AHI≤50) will receive both PAP and MAS. As a recent innovation, we have adherence monitors for MAS that can give a new and comprehensive comparative analysis of the effectiveness between MAS and PAP. In the randomized trial phase the two treatments will be used separately for 1 month each (after treatment adaptation/titration of 1-2 months for each device). Treatment efficacy and daily treatment use data will be assessed together with changes in symptoms (quality of life, sleepiness and fatigue). Patient initial preference will be determined by using a patient decision aid. This will be followed by the observational trial phase, where all patients will have access to both interventions at home for 6 months and be allowed to choose on a daily basis the intervention to use. The intervention duration of 6 months is to allow for a sustained response in long-term adherence and to observe changes in quality of life. ;

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Apnea
• Obstructive Sleep Apnea
• Sleep Apnea Syndromes
• Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

• NCT number: NCT02242617
• Study type: Interventional
• Source: University of British Columbia
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: November 2015
• Completion date: June 2020