Weight-loss and Gut-brain Interactions

Obesity Clinical Trial

Official title: Effect of Different Weight-loss Methods on Gut-brain Interactions

Status Not yet recruiting

Clinical Trial Summary

While exposure to an obesogenic environment has increased for almost every individual in western society, not everyone is equally susceptible to overeating and not everyone becomes obese. Teasing apart the physiological underpinnings of those individual seemingly protective- differences may contribute to the development of successful preventive measures and treatment. Neuroimaging studies started to deliver important insights into the neuroanatomical determination of individual eating behavior. However, food intake is not only determined by the brain, but is orchestrated by an interaction of peripheral hormones with neural circuits and decision-making processes. This interactive axis is also referred to as the gut-brain axis. While individual aspects of the axis have been studied extensively, detailed insight in the interaction of gut and brain in the regulation of food intake is lacking.

Objective: The current study aims to investigate the effect of a) caloric restriction (very low calorie diet (VLCD)); b) caloric restriction with mechanical restriction (Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB)); and c) caloric restriction with mechanical restriction and physiological changes through malapsorption (Roux- en- Y bypass (RYGB) surgery) on gut-brain interactions to find an optimal balance for weight loss and long-term sustained weight maintenance.

Clinical Trial Description

Rationale: While exposure to an obesogenic environment has increased for almost every individual in western society, not everyone is equally susceptible to overeating and not everyone becomes obese. Teasing apart the physiological underpinnings of those individual seemingly protective- differences may contribute to the development of successful preventive measures and treatment. Neuroimaging studies started to deliver important insights into the neuroanatomical determination of individual eating behavior. However, food intake is not only determined by the brain, but is orchestrated by an interaction of peripheral hormones with neural circuits and decision-making processes. This interactive axis is also referred to as the gut-brain axis. While individual aspects of the axis have been studied extensively, detailed insight in the interaction of gut and brain in the regulation of food intake is lacking.

Objective: The current study aims to investigate the effect of a) caloric restriction (very low calorie diet (VLCD)); b) caloric restriction with mechanical restriction (Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB)); and c) caloric restriction with mechanical restriction and physiological changes through malapsorption (Roux- en- Y bypass (RYGB) surgery) on gut-brain interactions to find an optimal balance for weight loss and long-term sustained weight maintenance.

Study design: In a repeated measures design a total of 45 obese (body mass index (BMI) > 35 ≤ 45) study participants will be investigated. All participants will undergo a weight loss period of 10% of initial body weight by means of VLCD intervention (n=15), RYGB surgery (n=15) or LAGB surgery (n=15).

Study population: The study population is composed out of people qualifying for a surgical weight loss procedure (RYGB or LAGB). A total of 45 obese (BMI > 35 ≤ 45) study participants between age 18 and 60 will be investigated Intervention: One subject group (n=15) will undergo a diet intervention, which consists of a very low calorie diet (VLCD; Modifast) containing 2.1MJ/d for 1 to 2 months, until they lost 10% of their initial body weight.

This intervention will be compared with 2 other weight loss groups; one group will undergo RYGB surgery and one group will undergo LAGB surgery. However, these surgical procedures will proceed as planned and according to the standard clinical practice, and will in no way be changed.

Main study parameters/endpoints: To determine the optimal interaction of gut hormones and brain activity for successful weight loss and sustained weight maintenance this study will examine the effect of interaction of gastrointestinal hormone release on neural network activation through a) caloric restriction; b) caloric restriction with physiological restriction; and c) caloric restriction with malapsorption on food reward processing and decision making in the brain as well as on gastrointestinal hormone release.

• The main parameters contributing to efficient, effective and satisfactorily weight maintenance at the same time is the change in satiety and in food reward upon an iso-energetic test-meal. This will be the main factor contributing to compliance and preventing reversal, (measured by visual analog scales (VAS), changes in ad libitum meal intake, representation in the brain of food reward processing and decision making, computer test, TFEQ for cognitive restraint, disinhibition and hunger).

• Secondary contributions to this main parameter are:

• Possible changes in the gut-microbiota population, interacting with neuronal signaling for satiety and reward;

• The weight loss itself, changes in body-composition, and changes in resting- and diet-induced energy expenditure, all underscoring weight maintenance.

• Possible changes in the endocannabinoid profile, interacting with neuronal signaling for satiety and reward Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: This research is beneficial to the subjects, in that they all, being obese, will loose body-weight. Subjects included in the diet induced weight loss group will lose 10% of their initial weight, which is beneficial for the operation, as it will decrease the risk. This will however not compromise their possibility to undergo surgery if their BMI decreases below 35, as the intake for surgery is based upon the initial screening, proving that they are not able to be weight stable and that they already tried to be at a healthy stable weight with other weight loss methods. All participants will have to come visit the metabolic research unit Maastricht (MURM) on 4 different occasions, twice before the weight loss procedure and twice after. These visits will be combined with regular hospital visits as much as possible.

FMRI is a non-invasive standard method for to determine blood oxygenation in areas of interest without any significant risks (See document section K6 for standardized and approved methods for conducting fMRI experiments involving human subjects). It is a technique that utilizes magnetic fields and low-energy radio frequencies to visualize brain structures and brain function. Through careful screening procedures subjects with metallic fragments in their body will be excluded from the study since the fMRI magnet exerts a force on ferromagnetic objects. During test day 2 (before and after the weight loss procedure) a canula will be inserted for blood sampling. Blood sampling in this study does not include any other risks for the subjects, other than its usual risk of minor bruising.

One subject group will lose 10% of initial body weight using a VLCD. There are no risks for the subjects in consuming the VLCD (Modifast, together with the recommended fruit and vegetables) as the macronutrient composition and vitamins/minerals content meet the Dutch recommended daily allowance. This VLCD will demand some energy from the subjects at home. However, due to extensive experience with VLCD in our laboratory and due to the benefit of weight loss for the participants we anticipate enough will-power to complete these 2 months VLCD.

This intervention will be compared with 2 other weight loss groups; one group will undergo RYGB surgery and one group will undergo LAGB surgery. RYGB is an operation that first divides the stomach into a small upper pouch and a much larger lower "remnant" pouch and then re-arranges the small intestine to connect to both, in this way bypassing part of the small intestine. With LAGB an inflatable band is placed around the upper part of the stomach to create a smaller stomach pouch. This slows and limits the amount of food that can be consumed at one time giving the opportunity for the sense of satiety to be met. It does not decrease gastric emptying time. However, both surgical procedures will proceed as planned and will in no way be changed. Therefore, further explanation is beyond the scope of this protocol. ;

Study Design

Allocation: Non-Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Obesity

• NCT number: NCT01740050
• Study type: Interventional
• Source: Maastricht University Medical Center
• Contact: Mieke JI Martens, Phd
• Phone: 0031433882124
• Email: mieke.martens@maastrichtuniversity.nl
• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: January 2013