View clinical trials related to NPC.
Filter by:The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of BL-B01D1 in patients with Metastatic or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and Other Solid Tumors.
This is a phase 1b/II, open label, multicenter study of IBI310 (Anti-CTLA4 mAb) in combination with Sintilimab in patients with recurrent/metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma that failed prior Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy
This would be a phase II prospective single arm mono-institutional study conducted in Queen Mary Hospital (Hong Kong) assessing the efficacy and safety of bintrafusp alfa in previously treated patients with recurrent and metastatic (R/M) non-keratinizing nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC)
Continuous regular monitoring of plasma EBV DNA in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) after treatment have rarely been investigated. The investigators try to analyze the long-term observational results (role in early relapse detection and impact on survival) in NPC patients after curative treatment.
The purpose of this study is to compare cisplatin-based with carboplatin-based chemoradiotherapy in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), in order to confirm the value of carboplatin-based chemoradiotherapy in NPC patients.
This is an open label, single arm, non-randomized, multi-site, phase 2 clinical trial of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab in combination with gemcitabine-cisplatin for 2 cycles,followed by concurrent pembrolizumab-cisplain-radiation, and then maintainence pembrolizumab monotherpy given every 3 weeks for a total treatment duration of 12 months, in previously untreated stage IVA ( UICC 8 th Edition ) nasopharyngeal cancer(NPC).
Irradiation of the parotid gland with subsequent long-term xerostomia is a well-recognized complication after radiotherapy for head and neck (HAN) cancers. A number of studies have shown that IMRT could minimize the radiation dose to the parotid glands and hence the risk of developing xerostomia. The benefit of IMRT has also been demonstrated in prior dosimetric and non-randomized studies in NPC patients. In 2007, the investigators have published the prospective randomized study of IMRT versus 2DRT in early stage NPC patients. In the study, IMRT had lower incidence of observer-rated severe xerostomia, higher parotid and whole saliva flow rate, than patients in 2DRT arm at 1 year after treatment. However, there was no significant difference in patient-reported outcome, i.e. subjective xerostomia scoring, between the 2 arms. The underlying reason for the incoherent findings in terms of objective and subjective xerostomia outcome remains uncertain. One of the possible explanations for this observation could be the better parotidsparing with IMRT alone may not entirely sufficient to maintain oral cavity lubrication while the other mucin-secretory salivary gland protection is also essential. Another possible explanation for the insignificant improvement in patient-reported outcome with IMRT is the short follow-up time. Gradual recovery or improvement in various quality of life parameters was not uncommonly seen several years after definitive radiotherapy for HAN cancer patients. There is much interest in studying the long term clinical outcome, especially the treatment-related complications, for the patients who had randomized and treated in the prior presented prospective study. In this study, the long term results, in particular the xerostomia rating will be assessed and compared in NPC patients who had participated in the prior reported prospective randomized study of IMRT vs 2DRT.
This is a phase IIa open-label, non-randomized dose-expansion study of OPB-111077 in patients with advanced, treatment refractory cancers who have biopsy-amenable lesions at study entry.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the EBV reactivation rate in post-radiation and remission NPC patients, evaluate the safety and tolerance of EGCG and analyze the observational correlation between EBV reactivation and clinical outcome.