View clinical trials related to Neutropenia.
Filter by:This is a multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase III study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Amphotericin B liposomes in patients with persistent neutropenia and fever.
Treatment of neutropenia of Glycogenosis type 1b patients with empagliflozin
Severe congenital neutropenia (SCN) is a group of primary immunodeficiencies caused by distinct gene mutations and characterized by neutrophil maturation impairment, which leads to neutropenia, predisposition to severe bacterial and fungal infections, and myeloid malignancies. Granulocyte-colony stimulation factor is used for pathogenetic therapy, however, no adequate response is seen in some patients. The only curative option for SCN is hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). An indication for HSCT in SCN is: no adequate response to G-CSF therapy, or development of malignancies, or found unfavorable mutations of SCN genes, leading to poor response to G-CSF and high risk of malignant transformation. One of the major peculiarities of HSCT in SCN is a high risk of graft failure. That was described in few studies in SCN transplantation and was also observed in our SCN HSCT cohort. We also consider the role of TCRab/CD19 graft depletion, which is routinely used in our center for GVHD prophylaxis in increased risks of graft failure. Another problem often observed in our patients is the relatively high risks of death of infections, developed after graft failure. Due to predominantly early HSCT graft failure development, non-sufficient immuablation is presumed as the main reason for graft failure. Because of the low level of toxicity, associated with TCRab/CD19 depletion usage, this strategy is planned to be used in the current study. To increase an immunoablative potential of conditioning regimen in SCN, total lymphoid irradiation will be studied in combination with myeloablative agents and standardly used serotherapy.
This study is a multi-center, forward-looking, open, randomized, controlled clinical trial. This study aims to analyze the effects of Mecapegfilgrastim Injection prevention versus non-prevention for neutropenia in ovarian cancer, cervical cancer, endometrial cancer patients after chemical therapy. Patients are randomized into study group and control group. All patients receive PTX+platinum chemotherapy of 3 weeks. In study group, patients accept PEG-rhG-CSF 24-48 hours from the chemotherapy. While the control group patients are only observed closely. Patient receive three courses of treatment. The primary end is the incidence of 3/4 level neutropenia in three courses of chemotherapy. The secondary ends include: the incidences and duration of neutropenia in every course of chemotherapy, the incidences of FN in three courses and every course of chemotherapy, the incidences of infection in three courses and every course of chemotherapy, the delay time of the next cycle of chemotherapy due to FN or infection, the RDI of the second and third cycles of chemotherapy, adverse events related to G-CSF, quality of life, cost of medicine and admitting.
Chemotherapy is used to treat cancer in many thousands of patients per annum in the United Kingdom and millions worldwide. Most chemotherapy suppresses bone marrow function and causes a low white cell count (neutropenia) which is a major cause of sepsis, a potentially fatal medical emergency. Best outcomes in sepsis result from early admission to hospital with the rapid start of antibiotics and supportive care. Currently, patients starting chemotherapy are told the importance of making contact with the hospital if they feel unwell or develop a high temperature. Despite this it is common for patients to delay telephoning the Cancer Centre "hot line" until after enduring many hours of symptoms and ultimately being admitted to hospital very unwell and sometimes in life threatening septic shock. This proposal (REACT) seeks to invert the current model of care with the aim of improving patient outcomes whilst reducing costs. In this proof of concept pilot study we aim to assess the feasibility of using remote wearable biosensors to record key physiological parameters (including respiratory rate, heart rate and temperature) and transmit this data centrally to The Christie. We will also assess retrospectively whether perturbations in biosensor collected data correlate with clinical episodes of sepsis and if so develop bespoke clinical algorithms to identify patients displaying "red flags" for sepsis and guide response. Data collected by the sensors is at this stage only being reviewed retrospectively. Subsequent phases would involve recruiting larger number of patients to develop and test these algorithms with patients exhibiting 'red flags' for sepsis being contacted by the clinical team and taking appropriate action to facilitate assessment and treatment. The results of this study will determine whether working towards a randomised phase III trial comparing REACT with standard of care is an appropriate next step.
The aim of this study is to observe and evaluate the cost-effectiveness,efficacy and safety of PEG-rhG-CSF in preventing chemotherapy-induced neutropenia(CIN) of cancer patients in the real world.1000 patients with non-myeloid malignancy who is planned to receive PEG-rhG-CSF for CIN prevention and 500 patients with non-myeloid malignancy who is planned to receive rhG-CSF for CIN prevention or treatment were prospectively recruited.The primary outcome was cost-effectiveness and second outcome was febrile neutropenia,the incidence and duration of grade IV neutropenia,chemotherapy delay,incidence of reduced dose of chemotherapy and relative dose intensity of chemotherapy.
This trial is a multicenter, non-interventional, registered real-world clinical study. Based on available evidence and recommendations of guidelines, tumor patients with high risk of FN and eligible for all enrollment criteria were recruited into primary prophylaxis of PEG-rhG-CSF or secondary prophylaxis of PEG-rhG-CSF according to the real-world clinical pathway without randomization. All patients need to receive at least 2 cycles of PEG-rhG-CSF prophylaxis. Researchers will record the incidence of FN, RDI, FN-related hospitalization, antibiotic use, direct medical care and indirect medical care cost under the real clinical conditions, and assess the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of PEG-rhG-CSF primary prophylaxis versus secondary prophylaxis through sub-group analysis and exploratory research.
This clinical study is a multiple center, registering and real-world conditional research. The breast cancer patients planning for chemotherapy evaluated with medium-high risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) are recruited, receiving the first level prophylactic use of PEG-rhG-CSF or the second level prophylactic use of PEG-rhG-CSF in at least two cycles of chemotherapy according to real-world clinical judgement and choice by physicians in local cancer center. Comparing real conditional-FN rate, FN-caused hospitalization rate and antibiotic use rate, direct/indirect medical cost.
A Prospective, open, randomized, controlled clinical study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PEG-rhG-CSF(PEGylated recombinant human granulocyte stimulating factor injection) in reducing neutropenia during TP(docetaxel+cisplatin) regiment simultaneous radiochemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with cervical cancer
The purpose of this trial is to observe the changes in white cell counts in patients with cancer during chemotherapy and to determine if changes in the white cell count in the early days during chemotherapy can be used as a predictor of severe neutropenia and its complications.