View clinical trials related to Neuromuscular Disease.
Filter by:Validation of a measure specifically suitable to evaluate the residual function of upper limbs of non-ambulant neuromuscular patients, especially with Duchenne muscular dystrophy and spinal muscular atrophy. This approach is of fundamental importance for clinical monitoring and preparing the future therapeutic trials.
The critical nature of respiratory diseases, the continuously increasing prevalence of these conditions, and the subjective perception of patients vis-à-vis their pulmonary function and health status underscore the importance of home telemonitoring. These conditions are critical and necessitate close and regular monitoring that may be achieved at distance using telemonitoring. This study will assess a number of measures both at baseline and post-intervention from a number of domains, including Arterial Blood Gases (ABG), BiPAP-related data, chronic respiratory failure symptoms, health-related quality of life, patients satisfaction and utilization of healthcare resources.
The purpose of this study is to determine if inspiratory muscle strength training (IMST) will impact maximal inspiratory pressure and pulmonary function in patients with neuromuscular disease.
Inefficient cough is responsible of respiratory complications in neuromuscular patients which can lead to hospitalisation and can be life threatening. Techniques enhancing cough efficiency are successful in improving the clearance of bronchial secretions and help non invasive ventilation efficiency especially in case of acute respiratory failure. Combining mechanical exsufflation to the manual techniques of physiotherapy might enhance efficiency. Therefore the investigators want to compare cough efficiency under different techniques of instrumental and manual of cough assistance in order to determine the best combination to optimize cough flow.
Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is a form of ventilation delivered by a mask and is an important mode of treatment in patients with both acute and chronic respiratory (breathing) failure. Humidification is widely accepted as an essential part of the ventilation strategy in patients receiving invasive ventilation (i.e. via a tube inserted into the mouth), but its role during NIV use is not proven. Consequently, there is a variation in practice with regard to humidification during NIV. Humidification is important in maintaining upper and lower airway mucosal function and patients requiring NIV often report symptoms, such as throat dryness, due to a lack of airway humidity. Success of NIV in the acute setting is dependent on many factors including, patient tolerance of NIV during the acute phase. In patients with chronic obstructive airways disease (COPD), poor tolerance results in NIV failure, which necessitates endotracheal intubation or treatment failure. Furthermore, invasive ventilation increases the risk of a hospital acquired pneumonia, which is associated with a worse outcome. In the long term setting of NIV use, again patients frequently report symptoms due to drying of the airways and adherence to NIV can be highly variable. Adherence in these patients is important in improving both quality and length of life. Humidification devices may be technically effective, but clinicians have concerns regarding potential negative effects of these devices. There is a requirement to evaluate the use of humidification in both the acute and long term use of NIV, particular, in terms of patient ventilator interaction, which will impact on comfort and adherence to NIV. This will effect the overall effectiveness of ventilation. The investigators propose a randomised controlled trial to investigate the effects of a humidification system during noninvasive ventilation.
To evaluate a novel advanced physiological monitoring system to improve nocturnal non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in Neuromuscular disease (NMD), Chest wall disease (CWD), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome (OHS) patients. By enhancing sleep comfort, adherence to ventilation will increase which, in turn, will improve ventilatory failure, quality of life and reduce length of admission during initiation of therapy. We aim to incorporate this technology into routine clinical practice.
The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy and tolerance of autotitrating non-invasive ventilation (NIV) versus standard NIV in patients admitted to hospital with acute exacerbation of chronic respiratory failure. The investigators hypothesise that autotitrating NIV will ventilate patients with acute exacerbations of chronic respiratory failure as effectively as standard NIV.
This study is being conducted to test whether exercise can be effectively used as an intervention to treat Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA). In order to answer this question, the investigators will enroll 14 subjects with SMA between ages 8 and 50 and ask them to complete an 18 month training schedule. At some points subjects will be asked to closely follow a specific training regimen and at other points they may be asked to exercise in the same manner they do normally. The exercises they will be asked to perform include biking on a stationary cycle and lifting hand weights. Subjects will be asked to come in to the clinic seven times over the course of the study to perform tests. These tests include motor function measures, a physical exam, questionnaires, a exercise capacity test which involves riding a stationary bicycle, and test where the subject is asked to walk as far as they can in six minutes. The main goal of the study is to see if the subjects who participate in the exercise protocol have larger increases in the distance they can walk in six minutes than those who do not.
This is a phase 2a, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-center study. Twenty-one patients who qualify for the study will be randomly assigned to either active drug or placebo. The study will take place at Newcastle University. Patients will have a 66% chance of getting active drug. Patients will be required to take study treatment orally twice a day for 28 days. A baseline visit will occur within 21 days of screening visit. All patients will be followed for 1 week after completion of study or early withdrawal from the study.
This study is looking at whether there is a difference in outcomes using two different types of breathing support in those patients who have chronic respiratory failure (patients who under-breathe). There is little data to demonstrate which mode of ventilation is better in terms of physiological outcomes and outcome data relating to patient symptoms. We hypothesize that one type of breathing support: pressure support ventilation would be more comfortable for patients as it more closely matches a patient's own respiratory pattern and and so leads to improved adherence and consequent improvement in quality of life. Patients with respiratory failure will be randomly assigned to receive either pressure support ventilation or pressure control ventilation for the first 6 weeks and then cross-over to receive the mode not previously used for a further 6 weeks. They will have baseline data recorded and then be followed up after each 6 week block.