View clinical trials related to Neuromuscular Disease.
Filter by:This investigation is designed to evaluate the performance, comfort and ease of use of the Simplus and Eson masks amongst NIV patients who are currently on Bi-level therapy
This study is to evaluate the efficacy of a new therapy (Automatic Expiratory Positive Airway Pressure with intelligent Volume Assured Pressure Support (AutoEPAP iVAPS)) designed to treat respiratory insufficiency, respiratory failure and/or nocturnal hypoventilation with upper airway obstruction. The study will be performed in two phases: In a sleep unit and in the home environment. The new therapy will be compared against two existing ventilator therapies: "Spontaneous Timed (ST) mode" and "Intelligent Volume Assured Pressure Support (iVAPS)".
Respiratory failure is the most common cause of death in neuromuscular diseases. The aim of this research is to evaluate the thoracopulmonary recruitment by comparison of inspiratory vital capacity (VC ins)and inspiratory/expiratory vital capacity (VC ins-ex) with the vital capacity (VC) according to pathology and severity of pulmonary damage of patients with neuromuscular diseases. The methodology consists in realize VC by support of inspiratory/expiratory pressures, while the patient is passive and realizing a maximal inspiratory/expiratory effort simultaneously, with the aid of mechanical insufflation/exsufflation device (Cough Assist®). The evaluation will last for 30 minutes and the non-inclusion criteria are those for an insufflation. The study hypothesis is that long term insufflation/exsufflation device use could improve thoracopulmonary mobility.
Patient reported outcomes (PROs) instruments are often used to measure meaningful treatment benefit or risk in clinical trials. PROs allow patients voices to be heard in ways that assist healthcare clinicians to address treatment effects and individual patient preferences. Unfortunately, infants and young children, especially those with a debilitating disease, such as neuromuscular disorders (NMD), may be less able to provide clear and concise information about treatment effects. In this case, we often defer to parents and guardians (to be referred to collectively as parents throughout protocol) to provide their perception of their child s overall health and wellbeing. Including parents in the assessment process recognizes the unique knowledge parents have of their child s development, reinforces their central role in implementing interventions, and aids in their ability to make better-informed healthcare decisions [1]. Yet, most parent-reports for young children are confined to overall quality of life (QoL). While QoL is an important area of assessment, its meaning varies among different ages and populations, and its results are often not precise enough to reveal small differences within samples [2]. A more specific area of concern in children with NMD is early-onset muscle weakness leading to difficulties in motor function. The current lack of patient-centered, sensitive measures (based on motor function and item difficulty hierarchy) that are suited for repeated assessments in infants and young children with NMD represents a major obstacle to the rapid translation of promising therapeutic interventions from preclinical models to clinical research studies. Multiple clinical outcome measures used at a single time-point for capturing a child s functional status are burdensome, difficult to interpret and do not provide us with comprehensive, meaningful information to detect changes following an intervention [3]. Psychometric measures that can be completed by parents make it possible to collect a considerable amount of data over many time-points rather than being limited to a single clinical observation. Moreover, a parent-observational measure that focuses on their child s functional performance in their real-life will maximize the ecological validity of measures of motor development used for clinical trials. Objective: To develop a parent reported observational measure of motor development in infants and young children, which will serve as a complimentary tool to clinical observation by reporting motor function as observed in the home setting and which will be used in clinical trials. Study population: Parents of children aged 0-5 with neuromuscular disease and neuromuscular experts in pediatrics. Design: Qualitative (parent interviews, focus groups) and quantitative study (analysis of newly developed questionnaire) Outcome Measures: parental responses to phone interviews, neuromuscular expert responses to focus groups, parental responses to cognitive interviews, validity and reliability of newly developed questionnaire
The purpose of this study is to determine if inspiratory muscle strength training (IMST) will impact maximal inspiratory pressure and pulmonary function in patients with neuromuscular disease.
This is a phase 2a, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-center study. Twenty-one patients who qualify for the study will be randomly assigned to either active drug or placebo. The study will take place at Newcastle University. Patients will have a 66% chance of getting active drug. Patients will be required to take study treatment orally twice a day for 28 days. A baseline visit will occur within 21 days of screening visit. All patients will be followed for 1 week after completion of study or early withdrawal from the study.