Clinical Trials Logo

Neuroendocrine Tumors clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT01169649 Completed - PANCREAS Clinical Trials

Study of MK-2206 in Patients With Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (NET)

Start date: July 2010
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to test a new drug called MK-2206. This study is a phase II study. In cancer studies, a phase II study is to find out what effects, good and/or bad, a new treatment has against a certain type of cancer. MK-2206 is an oral medication known as a targeted therapy. By attaching to the target, we hope that MK-2206 may stop the cancer cells from further growth and dividing. This study will help find out if MK-2206 is a helpful drug when taken in patients with neuroendocrine tumor.

NCT ID: NCT01155258 Completed - Clinical trials for Stage IV Breast Cancer

Temsirolimus and Vinorelbine Ditartrate in Treating Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic Solid Tumors

Start date: June 2010
Phase: Phase 1
Study type: Interventional

RATIONALE: Temsirolimus may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as vinorelbine ditartrate, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving temsirolimus together with vinorelbine ditartrate may kill more tumor cells. PURPOSE: This phase I trial is studying the side effects and best dose of giving temsirolimus and vinorelbine ditartrate together in treating patients with unresectable or metastatic solid tumors.

NCT ID: NCT01135849 Completed - Breast Cancer Clinical Trials

B-Receptor Signaling in Cardiomyopathy

Start date: November 2008
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

We hope to determine the importance of different genes (including B receptors) in anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy. This has important benefits to patients exposed to anthracyclines, as this could help determine whether certain individuals have increased susceptibility to cardiac injury.

NCT ID: NCT01121562 Completed - Clinical trials for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Efficacy And Safety Of Sunitinib In Patients With Advanced Well-Differentiated Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Start date: July 2010
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the effect of Sunitinib on the clinical benefit response rate.

NCT ID: NCT01099540 Completed - Clinical trials for Neuroendocrine Tumor

Study of Pazopanib Monotherapy in Patients With Unresectable, Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumor

Start date: April 2010
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

To determine the response rate of pazopanib when administered as monotherapy in patients with unresectable neuroendocrine tumor.

NCT ID: NCT01099228 Completed - Clinical trials for Neuroendocrine Tumors

Combination Targeted Radiotherapy in Neuroendocrine Tumors

Start date: September 2006
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The primary aim of this project is to determine, what fraction of individuals with neuroendocrine tumors would show substantially improved tumor dosimetry with combined agent therapy compared to "best" single agent therapy and determine the magnitude of the potential tumor radiation dose increase.

NCT ID: NCT01048892 Completed - Sarcoma Clinical Trials

Seneca Valley Virus-001 and Cyclophosphamide in Treating Young Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Neuroblastoma, Rhabdomyosarcoma, or Rare Tumors With Neuroendocrine Features

Start date: September 2009
Phase: Phase 1
Study type: Interventional

RATIONALE: Seneca Valley virus-001 may be able to kill certain kinds of tumor cells without damaging normal cells. Adding low dose cyclophosphamide (in part B of study) may help to kill even more tumor cells. PURPOSE: This phase I trial is studying the side effects and best dose of Seneca Valley virus-001 in treating young patients with relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, or rare tumors with neuroendocrine features.

NCT ID: NCT01024387 Completed - Clinical trials for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor

AMG 479 in Advanced Carcinoid and Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Start date: March 2010
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this research study is to determine the effectiveness of AMG 479 against carcinoid and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. AMG 479 is an antibody that is made in the laboratory. Antibodies are highly specific proteins produced by the body's immune system that recognize foreign substances in the body. AMG 479 has been used in other research studies and information from those other research studies suggests that AMG 479 may help to prevent the growth of some neuroendocrine tumors. The observed antitumor activity of AMG 479, together with the current limited treatment options available for patients with neuroendocrine tumors, warrant further investigation of AMG 479 in this patient population.

NCT ID: NCT01010126 Completed - Clinical trials for Recurrent Ovarian Carcinoma

Temsirolimus and Bevacizumab in Treating Patients With Advanced Endometrial, Ovarian, Liver, Carcinoid, or Islet Cell Cancer

Start date: September 8, 2009
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

This phase II trial studies how well temsirolimus and bevacizumab work in treating patients with advanced endometrial, ovarian, liver, carcinoid, or islet cell cancer. Temsirolimus may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Monoclonal antibodies, such as bevacizumab, can block tumor growth in different ways. Some block the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Others find tumor cells and help kill them or carry tumor-killing substances to them. Bevacizumab may also stop the growth of cancer by blocking blood flow to the tumor. Giving temsirolimus together with bevacizumab may kill more tumor cells.

NCT ID: NCT00990535 Completed - Clinical trials for Pancreatic Neoplasms

High Dose Somatostatin Analogues in Neuroendocrine Tumors

HIDONET
Start date: January 2006
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

Octreotide (OCT) is a somatostatin analogue (SSA) available in a long-acting formulation, conventionally administered every 28 days at the maximum dose of 30 mg. Together with lanreotide, it is considered the therapy of choice in the control of endocrine syndromes associated with neuroendocrine tumors (NET)s. A complete or partial clinical response to SSA therapy is generally achieved in at least 50% of the patients with neuroendocrine syndrome. Many studies reported a clinical response in 70-90% of functioning NETs. In about 36-50% of the patients with progressive advanced well differentiated NET (WDNET), a stabilization of disease occurs after treatment with subcutaneous OCT. By developing long-acting slow-release SSA formulation, long-acting OCT (LAR), lanreotide-SR, lanreotide-Autogel, the patient's compliance to SSA therapy was improved and escape from treatment, which was common with the subcutaneous formulation, was avoided. However, rate of objective response was not significantly improved as compared to short-acting SSA. On the other hand, it has to be remarked that long-acting SSA are being used in NET patients at doses correspondent to the low doses of short-acting formulation. The higher commercially available doses of LAR is 30 mg, which is assumed to be comparable to 300 µg of short-acting OCT in the therapy of acromegaly. Only one study was designed to investigate the use of high-dose LAR (160 mg every 28 days). In this study, objective and hormonal responses in patients with progressive metastatic ileal NET non-responder to standard doses, was significantly elevated. However, this compound has never been commercialized and, of consequence, this first preliminary observation has not been confirmed by further studies. No systematic studies were performed with the commercially available long-acting SSA used in high-dose treatments. In patients with progressive locally advanced or metastatic NET, increase of the dose or reduction of the interval between injections is a relatively common "empirical" clinical practice, but no studies have been performed to evaluate safety and efficacy of this treatment schedule.