View clinical trials related to Nephrolithiasis.
Filter by:A prospective study comparing different laser settings used for stone fragmentation during ureteroscopy
Upper Urinary Tract Tumors have an incidence of 1 to 2 cases for 100 000 persons per year. The standard treatment for these tumors is the ablation of the kidney, ureter and a part of the bladder surrounding the ureteral orifice. The development of new diagnosis and treatment techniques through natural routes opens the possibility to use conservative treatments. The investigators hypothesis is that during a reno-ureteroscopy, laser confocal microscopy will allow the discrimination between normal and pathologic urothelium by microscopic analysis. This will prevent the systematic use of biopsies which are often difficult and iatrogenic.
This is a prospective randomized trial to study the effect of assigning the control of the fluoroscopic x-ray activation to the surgeon as compared to the radiation technologist. Radiation exposure will be assessed from the collected data, fluoroscopy time, and dose parameters (cumulative absorbed dose and dose area product). From exposure data, entrance skin dose (ESD) and midline absorbed dose (MLD) will be calculated. The primary outcome in this study will be total fluoroscopy time for the procedure. A secondary outcome will be the ESD. The investigators will further analyze the contribution of clinical predictors (e.g. stone size/location) and procedural predictors on fluoroscopy times and ESD. It is hypothesized that a 30% reduction in fluoroscopy time will occur when the operating surgeon is controlling the activation of the x-ray beam.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether new software processing of ultrasound images can improve detection and size determination of kidney stones.
Patients with a ureteral or kidney stone that causes symptoms, like pain, frequently have small kidney stones that don't cause symptoms. If these small kidney stones are determined to be asymptomatic (not causing any problems or pain), then most urologists will simply remove the symptomatic ureteral stone and leave the additional stones in the kidneys. However, symptomatic kidney stones started as small stones that didn't cause symptoms. This means that the small stones remaining in the patient's kidney may cause problems later. The purpose of our research is to test if removing small stones from the kidney prevents future stone episodes.
The overall purpose of this study is to evaluate criterion-related validity of a newly-developed disease-specific instrument to assess the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of patients who have had kidney stones. Specific aims of this study are: 1. Aim 1. Evaluate the population/external validity (generalizability) of the Wisconsin Stone-QOL by answering the question, "Is the Wisconsin Stone-QOL useful for assessing the HRQOL of patients who form kidney stones from a broad region of North America?" 2. Aim 2. Assess the ability of the Wisconsin Stone-QOL to detect changes within patients related to stone interventions and other disease-specific outcomes by answering the question, "Is the Wisconsin Stone-QOL sensitive to changes in stone-related outcomes within individuals?"
Assessment of Health-related Quality of Life in Rare Kidney Stone Formers in the Rare Kidney Stone Consortium
The purpose of this clinical study is to evaluate BackStop, a polymer-based device that is intended to be used during ureteroscopic lithotripsy to prevent retrograde stone migration.
In this study the investigators propose to use a daily dose of 45 mg (30 mg at 8 AM and 15 mg at 4 PM). This relatively small well-tolerated dose is likely to persistently increase urine volume and reduce urine supersaturation and to be well tolerated by patients with kidney stone disease and normal renal function (see below). The twice-daily (8 AM and 4 PM) regimen is designed to produce a maximal AVP inhibition on waking with a gradual fall-off of effect during the night. To this end, a higher dose is used in the morning, with a lower dose in the afternoon.
Ureteric stents are used often following ureteroscopy for prevention of obstruction from edema and or stone fragments. They are often associated with pain, voiding often, the need to urinate quickly and finding blood in the urine called "lower urinary tract symptoms" or LUTS for short. There is randomized studies showing the efficacy of α-blockers such as tamsulosin in relieving "stent symptoms" (pain and LUTS). There is emerging but limited evidence to show that antimuscarinic medications, used to treat overactive bladder (OAB) have some efficacy in decreasing stent symptoms. Mirabegron is a beta-agonist used to decrease OAB symptoms. Mirabegron functions to mediate relaxation of the detrusor muscle and has been useful in treating OAB symptoms. Conventional antimuscarinic medications often have bothersome side effects like dry mouth, constipation, blurred vision and cognitive impairment. This may limit their use in some populations. Mirabegron is well-tolerated with a good safety profile and therefore may be useful in treating stent symptoms without the bothersome side effects commonly seen with antimuscarinic medications. . The investigators hypothesize that mirabegron is effective in decreasing ureteral stent related LUTS and pain.