Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

The primary objective is to patient-reported Quality of Life related to complete control of Radiation Induced Nausea and Vomiting (RINV) between standard palliative radiotherapy and VMAT. Secondarily, we will assess rate of complete control of RINV. However, the investigators hypothesize that there will be no difference in pain response between the two arms, because they are receiving the same dose.


Clinical Trial Description

For this study, SUPR (simple unplanned palliative radiotherapy) refers to the delivery of radiation to the treatment area with a simple technique, either two opposed fields (parallel opposed pair), or a single direct field. The entire portal is exposed to the specified dose and therefore does not spare normal tissue. This technique requires minimal calculation, and typically the dose distribution is not reviewed by the radiation oncologist or medical physics. In general, the adverse event profile of RT is associated with irradiation of normal tissue within the treatment field. With the dose prescribed in this study, the probability of serious adverse effects is exceedingly low. However, fatigue, soreness, pain flare, and skin-redness in the irradiated area are relatively common adverse events. In addition, site-specific toxicity could occur, including esophagitis, nausea, or diarrhea when there is dose delivered to the GI tract. Avoiding this toxicity is a motivating factor for the study. In order to deliver 3D Conformal Radiotherapy, a computerized tomography (CT) simulation is used to develop the treatment plan. The goal is to deliver a conformal radiation dose to the target volume with maximal sparing of the normal tissue. VMAT (Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy) is a type of 3D conformal RT, and delivers the radiation dose more conformally than SUPR, possibly reducing acute and late toxicity. The disadvantages of VMAT include more complex planning and quality assurance processes compared with SUPR. The complex planning required can be time-consuming, which can have a significant impact on departmental resources, and the wait time for the patient. Bone metastases are the most common site of distant metastases and can cause severe and disabling effects, including pain, spinal cord compression and pathologic fracture. These complications can greatly affect a patient's quality of life and cause immense suffering. Radiotherapy (RT) is an effective treatment for palliative patients with painful bone metastases. It is also efficacious in preserving function and maintaining skeletal integrity, while minimizing the occurrence of adverse skeletal related events. There is a significant amount of evidence showing that a single fraction (SF) of RT provides equivalent pain relief as multiple fractions (MF), which are associated with more acute toxicity, are less convenient for patients and costlier for the health care system. Therefore, single fraction radiation therapy (SFRT) is encouraged, but 20 Gy in 5 fractions is also allowed in this study, though should be chosen only in patients with a complicated bone metastases by fracture, neurological deficit (e.g. spinal cord compression), or a large soft tissue component. In patients with advanced disease, management strategies focus on improving quality of life (QOL), rather than conventional endpoints such as survival. Currently, the standard of care in British Columbia for palliative patients with bone metastases is SUPR. In other jurisdictions, however, factors such as physician remuneration make other complex planning techniques more popular. BC Cancer is publicly funded with no direct costs to patients. All RT in the province is provided by 6 centres where radiation oncologists receive an annual salary, which are independent of RT treatment technique and duration. Due to the lack of financial incentive associated with a more complex RT plan, BC Cancer is a unique clinical setting to assess the use of VMAT versus SUPR. As facilities providing RT have gained more experience with VMAT and improvements to VMAT planning software have been made, the planning time required has been reduced. Previously, approximately 2 weeks was required for a team at the BC Cancer to create a VMAT plan for a palliative patient with bone metastases; however, we hypothesize this can now be reduced to three days in settings with low dose prescription. This study will allow the investigators to determine if there is reduced toxicity associated with VMAT compared to SUPR with only a modest impact on resources. The investigators hypothesis is that VMAT will have reduced toxicity compared with SUPR for palliative patients with bone metastases. The investigators also hypothesize that there will be no difference between the two arms in terms of pain response, due to the fact that the doses are equal. This hypothesis is driven by the radiobiologic rationale, which defines effective RT as the ability of radiation to induce tumour cell death while sparing normal cells. The importance in determining if there is any benefit in terms of toxicity with VMAT compared with SUPR for palliative patients with bone metastases is obvious when consequences related to its adoption are considered. As previously discussed, although the planning time has been drastically reduced, there is still an expected modest increase in resources required to carry out a VMAT plan. For patients, the pre-treatment process of VMAT is more burdensome, i.e. patients have to wait longer before receiving VMAT as compared to SUPR, due to the increased plan complexity. Therefore, it is important to consider the patient experience in relation to the RT administration. In summary, evidence that either supports or refutes the hypothesis that VMAT will have reduced toxicity compared with SUPR for patients with bone metastases will be helpful in guiding future practices. We are not aware of any other randomized control trials (completed or ongoing) that have addressed this issue, though a London Ontario study is randomizing patients receiving palliative lung RT to SUPR vs VMAT. Due to the implications of VMAT on departmental resources and patient experience, better evidence from a randomized control trial is required before the widespread use of this technique can be justified. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT03694015
Study type Interventional
Source British Columbia Cancer Agency
Contact Hadassah Abraham
Phone 250-645-7300
Email hadassah.abraham@bccancer.bc.ca
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
Start date December 2, 2019
Completion date June 2024

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03826043 - THrombo-Embolic Event in Onco-hematology N/A
Terminated NCT03166631 - A Trial to Find the Safe Dose for BI 891065 Alone and in Combination With BI 754091 in Patients With Incurable Tumours or Tumours That Have Spread Phase 1
Completed NCT01938846 - BI 860585 Dose Escalation Single Agent and in Combination With Exemestane or With Paclitaxel in Patients With Various Advanced and/or Metastatic Solid Tumors Phase 1
Recruiting NCT06058312 - Individual Food Preferences for the Mediterranean Diet in Cancer Patients N/A
Completed NCT03308942 - Effects of Single Agent Niraparib and Niraparib Plus Programmed Cell Death-1 (PD-1) Inhibitors in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Participants Phase 2
Recruiting NCT06018311 - Exercising Together for Hispanic Prostate Cancer Survivor-Caregiver Dyads N/A
Withdrawn NCT05431439 - Omics of Cancer: OncoGenomics
Completed NCT01343043 - A Pilot Study of Genetically Engineered NY-ESO-1 Specific NY-ESO-1ᶜ²⁵⁹T in HLA-A2+ Patients With Synovial Sarcoma Phase 1
Completed NCT01938638 - Open Label Phase I Dose Escalation Study With BAY1143572 in Patients With Advanced Cancer Phase 1
Recruiting NCT05514444 - Study of MK-4464 as Monotherapy and in Combination With Pembrolizumab in Participants With Advanced/Metastatic Solid Tumors (MK-4464-001) Phase 1
Recruiting NCT02292641 - Beyond TME Origins N/A
Terminated NCT00954512 - Study of Robatumumab (SCH 717454, MK-7454) in Combination With Different Treatment Regimens in Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors (P04722, MK-7454-004) Phase 1/Phase 2
Recruiting NCT04958239 - A Study to Test Different Doses of BI 765179 Alone and in Combination With Ezabenlimab in Patients With Advanced Cancer (Solid Tumors) Phase 1
Recruiting NCT04627376 - Multimodal Program for Cancer Related Cachexia Prevention N/A
Completed NCT01222728 - Using Positron Emission Tomography to Predict Intracranial Tumor Growth in Neurofibromatosis Type II Patients
Recruiting NCT06004440 - Real World Registry for Use of the Ion Endoluminal System
Active, not recruiting NCT05636696 - COMPANION: A Couple Intervention Targeting Cancer-related Fatigue N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06035549 - Resilience in East Asian Immigrants for Advance Care Planning Discussions N/A
Recruiting NCT06004466 - Noninvasive Internal Jugular Venous Oximetry
Completed NCT03190811 - Anti-PD-1 Alone or Combined With Autologous DC-CIK Cell Therapy in Advanced Solid Tumors Phase 1/Phase 2