A Study on Improved Dynamic Myocardial Perfusion With Less Effective

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

Among the current myocardial CT perfusion techniques, dynamic CT perfusion technique is most advantageous in obtaining information on myocardial blood flow and volume. However, dynamic CT perfusion technique involves higher radiation dose than static CT techniques. Patients have to take a breath hold during 30 seconds with current dynamic CT perfusion protocol. If patients cannot hold their breath, anterior or inferior myocardium might be excluded due to limited scan coverage of a 128-slice dual-source CT scanner.

Reduction of scanning duration of dynamic CT perfusion may not only reduce radiation exposure, but also make patients more comfortable. Therefore, the investigators intended to propose a modified scan protocol with shorter scan duration and compare diagnostic accuracy of a modified scan protocol with the current scan protocol.

Clinical Trial Description

The aim of this study is to compare the diagnostic performance of adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial CT perfusion using a reduced dynamic scan duration with perfusion protocol of 30-second scan duration for the detection of myocardial perfusion defect and significant coronary artery stenosis.

This trial is a single center, prospective, randomized trial designed to compare diagnostic performances and radiation doses between two protocols with 30-second or 21-second dynamic scan durations. A total of 120 symptomatic patients will be randomized to dynamic CT perfusion protocols with 30-second or 21-second scan duration. They will also undergo 1.5-T MRI and invasive coronary angiography as reference standards for the assessment of myocardial perfusion and coronary artery stenosis. The primary end point of the study is to compare diagnostic performances between two CT protocols of dynamic CT perfusion. The secondary endpoint of this study is to compare radiation doses and image qualities of two scan protocols. ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT02161081
Study type	Interventional
Source	Samsung Medical Center
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase	N/A
Start date	January 2012
Completion date	July 2014

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Not yet recruiting	`NCT06032572` - Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of the VRS100 System in PCI (ESSENCE)	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05846893` - Drug-Coated Balloon vs. Drug-Eluting Stent for Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Large Coronary Artery Disease	N/A
Completed	`NCT04153006` - Comparison of Fingerstick Versus Venous Sample for Troponin I.
Completed	`NCT01205776` - EXCEL Clinical Trial	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT04555174` - BIOFLOW-VIII All-comers Orsiro Mission Safety and Performance Registry
Recruiting	`NCT04582877` - Pressure Guidewire System Multi-center, Prospective, Self-Control, Clinical Trial	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04390672` - Multivessel TALENT	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT03265535` - Validation of a Single Rest-Stress Imaging Protocol for Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
Not yet recruiting	`NCT04522583` - Increased CRP Concentrations in Patients Admitted to the Emergency Department With Troponin Elevation Aids to Rule Out Coronary Ischemia
Terminated	`NCT02407626` - Optimization of Cardioprotection in Diabetic Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery	N/A
Completed	`NCT02554006` - Predischarge Bundle to Minimize Negative Impact on Quality of Life of Nuisance Bleedings	N/A
Completed	`NCT02510547` - Comparison of a CrossBoss First Versus Standard Wire Escalation Strategy for Crossing Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion: the "CrossBoss First" Trial	Phase 4
Active, not recruiting	`NCT02189499` - Feasibility Study of the Amaranth Medical FORTITUDE Bioresorbable Drug-Eluting Coronary Stent	Phase 2
Completed	`NCT02264717` - Dan-NICAD - Danish Study of Non-Invasive Diagnostic Testing in Coronary Artery Disease	N/A
Completed	`NCT02197065` - Pilot Study of Atorvastatin for Orthopedic Surgery Patients	Phase 2
Recruiting	`NCT01681381` - Evaluate Safety And Effectiveness Of The Tivoli® DES and The Firebird2® DES For Treatment Coronary Revascularization	N/A
Completed	`NCT01679886` - Comparison of Rubidium PET and SPECT With CZT Crystals for Detection of Myocardial Ischemia in Overweighed Patients and Women	N/A
Terminated	`NCT01892917` - BIOFLOW-III Hungary Satellite Registry	N/A
Completed	`NCT01655043` - Absolute Quantification of Coronary Flow Reserve by Stress Perfusion MRI	Phase 2
Completed	`NCT01434043` - Diagnostic Accuracy of Cardiac CT Perfusion Compared to PET Imaging

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

A Study on Improved Dynamic Myocardial Perfusion With Less Effective Radiation Dose in CT (SIMPLE CT)

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms