Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Trial
— AFFINITYOfficial title:
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study With Optional Open-Label Extension in Subjects With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of BIIB033 as an Add-On Therapy to Anti-Inflammatory Disease-Modifying Therapies
Verified date | March 2022 |
Source | Biogen |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The primary objective of Part 1 of this study is to evaluate the effects of BIIB033 versus placebo on disability improvement over 72 weeks. The primary objective of Part 2 of this study is to evaluate the long-term safety profile of BIIB033 as an add-on therapy in participants with MS. The secondary objective of Part 1 is to evaluate the effects of BIIB033 versus placebo on additional measures of disability improvement. The secondary objective of Part 2 is to investigate long-term efficacy (disability improvement) and additional safety measures of BIIB033 as an add-on therapy in participants with MS.
Status | Terminated |
Enrollment | 263 |
Est. completion date | February 12, 2021 |
Est. primary completion date | February 12, 2021 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 58 Years |
Eligibility | Key Inclusion Criteria: Part 1 - Baseline Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) of 2.0 to 6.0, have a diagnosis of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) per the 2010 McDonald's criteria or onset of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) per the Lublin and Reingold criteria, and should have experienced their first MS symptom(s) within the previous 20 years. - Subjects must have experienced at least 1 of the following within 24 months prior to Day 1/Baseline: a clinical relapse (but not within 24 weeks prior to Day 1/Baseline), gadolinium-enhancing lesions on brain or spinal cord magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or new T2 lesion(s) on brain or spinal cord MRI. - Subjects must be on a stable dose of a protocol-specified anti-inflammatory disease-modifying therapy (DMT) (IFNß [Avonex, Plegridy, Betaferon/Betaseron, or Rebif], dimethyl fumarate (DMF) [Tecfidera], or natalizumab [Tysabri]) for at least 24 weeks prior to enrollment. - In addition, subjects must have met protocol-defined MRI characteristics using magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) sequences at Screening/Baseline. Key Inclusion Criteria: Part 2 -Subjects who complete study treatment (BIIB033 or placebo) at Part 1/Week 72 Visit. Key Exclusion Criteria: Part 1 - Primary progressive MS - An MS relapse that has occurred within 24 weeks prior to Day 1/Baseline or the subject has not stabilized from a previous relapse at the time of Screening. - Treatment with any chemotherapeutic agents (e.g., mitoxantrone, cyclophosphamide, cladribine), cell-depleting monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) (e.g., rituximab, ocrelizumab, alemtuzumab), total lymphoid irradiation, T-cell or T-cell receptor vaccination, or teriflunomide within 1 year prior to Day 1/Baseline. - Treatment with other anti-inflammatory DMTs (e.g., GA, fingolimod, daclizumab) or plasmapheresis within 24 weeks prior to Day1/Baseline. - Treatment with Botox for limb spasticity within 24 weeks before Day 1/Baseline. - Contraindications to MRI, for example, presence of pacemakers or other implanted metal devices (excluding dental braces), an allergy to gadolinium renal impairment, or claustrophobia that cannot be medically managed. - History of human immunodeficiency virus or other immunodeficient conditions. - History of malignancy; however, subjects with a history of excised or treated basal cell carcinoma or fewer than 3 squamous cell carcinomas are eligible to participate in this study. Key Exclusion Criteria: Part 2 - Subjects who did not complete study treatment in Part 1/Week 72 Visit - Subjects who have a duration >12 weeks between their Part 1/Week 72 Visit and Part 2/Day 1. - Contraindications to MRI, for example, presence of pacemakers or other implanted metal devices (excluding dental braces), an allergy to Gd, renal impairment, or claustrophobia that cannot be medically managed. - History of human immunodeficiency virus or other immunodeficient conditions not related to DMT treatment. - History of malignancy unless enrollment is approved by the Sponsor; subjects with a history of excised or treated basal cell carcinoma or fewer than 3 squamous cell carcinomas are eligible to participate in this study. NOTE: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Australia | Research Site | Box Hill | Victoria |
Australia | Research Site | Clayton | Victoria |
Australia | Research Site | Heidelberg | Victoria |
Australia | Research Site | Melbourne | Victoria |
Australia | Research Site | New Lambton Heights | |
Australia | Research Site | Parkville | Victoria |
Australia | Research Site | Westmead | |
Belgium | Research Site | Brugge | |
Belgium | Research Site | Bruxelles | |
Belgium | Research Site | Bruxelles | |
Belgium | Research Site | Gent | |
Belgium | Research Site | La Louvière | |
Belgium | Research Site | Leuven | |
Belgium | Research Site | Roeselare | |
Canada | Research Site | Edmonton | Alberta |
Canada | Research Site | Gatineau | Quebec |
Canada | Research Site | Longueuil | Quebec |
Canada | Research Site | Montreal | Quebec |
Canada | Research Site | Ottawa | Ontario |
Canada | Research Site | Toronto | Ontario |
Canada | Research Site | Vancouver | British Columbia |
Canada | Research Site | Victoria | British Columbia |
Czechia | Research Site | Brno | |
Czechia | Research Site | Brno | |
Czechia | Research Site | Hradec Kralove | |
Czechia | Research Site | Jihlava | |
Czechia | Research Site | Pardubice | |
Czechia | Research Site | Praha 2 | |
France | Research Site | Amiens Cedex 1 | Somme |
France | Research Site | Bordeaux | Gironde |
France | Research Site | Bron Cedex | Rhone |
France | Research Site | Clermont-Ferrand | Puy De Dome |
France | Research Site | Lille | Nord |
France | Research Site | Montpellier | Herault |
France | Research Site | Nantes Cedex 1 | Loire Atlantique |
France | Research Site | Nimes | Gard |
France | Research Site | Paris | |
France | Research Site | Strasbourg Cedex | Bas Rhin |
France | Research Site | Toulouse | Haute Garonne |
Germany | Research Site | Berlin | |
Germany | Research Site | Bochum | North Rhine-Westphalia |
Germany | Research Site | Dresden | Saxony |
Germany | Research Site | Duesseldorf | North Rhine-Westphalia |
Germany | Research Site | Freiburg | Baden Wuerttemberg |
Germany | Research Site | Muenchen | Bavaria |
Germany | Research Site | Muenster | |
Germany | Research Site | Trier | Rhineland-Palatinate |
Germany | Research Site | Tuebingen | Baden Wuerttemberg |
Germany | Research Site | Ulm | Baden Wuerttemberg |
Hungary | Research Site | Budapest | |
Hungary | Research Site | Budapest | |
Hungary | Research Site | Budapest | |
Hungary | Research Site | Esztergom | |
Hungary | Research Site | Kistarcsa | |
Hungary | Research Site | Pecs | |
Israel | Research Site | Ramat Gan | |
Italy | Research Site | Cefalù | Palermo |
Italy | Research Site | Genova | |
Italy | Research Site | Messina | |
Italy | Research Site | Milano | |
Italy | Research Site | Milano | |
Italy | Research Site | Montichiari | Brescia |
Italy | Research Site | Napoli | |
Italy | Research Site | Napoli | |
Italy | Research Site | Napoli | |
Italy | Research Site | Pisa | |
Italy | Research Site | Pozzilli | Isernia |
Italy | Research Site | Roma | |
Italy | Research Site | Verona | |
Netherlands | Research Site | Geleen | |
Poland | Research Site | Bydgoszcz | |
Poland | Research Site | Gdansk | |
Poland | Research Site | Katowice | |
Poland | Research Site | Katowice | |
Poland | Research Site | Krakow | |
Poland | Research Site | Lodz | |
Poland | Research Site | Lublin | |
Poland | Research Site | Szczecin | |
Poland | Research Site | Warszawa | |
Poland | Research Site | Zabrze | |
Spain | Research Site | Barakaldo | Vizcaya |
Spain | Research Site | Barcelona | |
Spain | Research Site | Barcelona | |
Spain | Research Site | Barcelona | |
Spain | Research Site | Cordoba | |
Spain | Research Site | Madrid | |
Spain | Research Site | Majadahonda | Madrid |
Spain | Research Site | Salt | Girona |
Spain | Research Site | Sevilla | |
Switzerland | Research Site | Aarau | |
Switzerland | Research Site | Basel | |
Switzerland | Research Site | Bern | |
Switzerland | Research Site | Lugano | |
Switzerland | Research Site | Zurich | |
United Kingdom | Research Site | Brighton | |
United Kingdom | Research Site | Exeter | Devon |
United Kingdom | Research Site | Glasgow | Strathclyde |
United Kingdom | Research Site | Leeds | West Yorkshire |
United Kingdom | Research Site | Liverpool | Merseyside |
United Kingdom | Research Site | London | Greater London |
United Kingdom | Research Site | London | Greater London |
United Kingdom | Research Site | Newcastle Upon Tyne | Tyne & Wear |
United Kingdom | Research Site | Nottingham | Nottinghamshire |
United Kingdom | Research Site | Oxford | Oxfordshire |
United Kingdom | Research Site | Plymouth | Devon |
United Kingdom | Research Site | Salford | Greater Manchester |
United Kingdom | Research Site | Sheffield | |
United Kingdom | Research Site | Swansea | |
United States | Research Site | Atlanta | Georgia |
United States | Research Site | Baltimore | Maryland |
United States | Research Site | Berkeley | California |
United States | Research Site | Boston | Massachusetts |
United States | Research Site | Boston | Massachusetts |
United States | Research Site | Centennial | Colorado |
United States | Research Site | Chicago | Illinois |
United States | Research Site | Chicago | Illinois |
United States | Research Site | Columbus | Ohio |
United States | Research Site | Cullman | Alabama |
United States | Research Site | Dallas | Texas |
United States | Research Site | Dayton | Ohio |
United States | Research Site | Durham | North Carolina |
United States | Research Site | Farmington Hills | Michigan |
United States | Research Site | Fort Collins | Colorado |
United States | Research Site | Freehold | New Jersey |
United States | Research Site | Gilbert | Arizona |
United States | Research Site | Houston | Texas |
United States | Research Site | Knoxville | Tennessee |
United States | Research Site | Las Vegas | Nevada |
United States | Research Site | Latham | New York |
United States | Research Site | Lexington | Kentucky |
United States | Research Site | Lexington | Massachusetts |
United States | Research Site | Long Beach | California |
United States | Research Site | Memphis | Tennessee |
United States | Research Site | Minneapolis | Minnesota |
United States | Research Site | New York | New York |
United States | Research Site | Newport Beach | California |
United States | Research Site | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma |
United States | Research Site | Orange | California |
United States | Research Site | Orem | Utah |
United States | Research Site | Overland Park | Kansas |
United States | Research Site | Patchogue | New York |
United States | Research Site | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania |
United States | Research Site | Portland | Oregon |
United States | Research Site | Raleigh | North Carolina |
United States | Research Site | Rochester | New York |
United States | Research Site | Round Rock | Texas |
United States | Research Site | Saint Louis | Missouri |
United States | Research Site | Saint Louis | Missouri |
United States | Research Site | Salt Lake City | Utah |
United States | Research Site | Seattle | Washington |
United States | Research Site | Seattle | Washington |
United States | Research Site | Stamford | Connecticut |
United States | Research Site | Stony Brook | New York |
United States | Research Site | Sunrise | Florida |
United States | Research Site | Tampa | Florida |
United States | Research Site | Teaneck | New Jersey |
United States | Research Site | Washington | District of Columbia |
United States | Research Site | Wellesley | Massachusetts |
United States | Research Site | Willow Grove | Pennsylvania |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Biogen |
United States, Australia, Belgium, Canada, Czechia, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Part 1: Overall Response Score | Overall Response Score is a multicomponent score based on 4 components: Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW), 9-Hole Peg Test in the dominant hand (9HPT-D), and 9HPT in the nondominant hand (9HPT-ND). Overall Score was sum of 4 components at each visit and ranges from +4 (improvement) to -4 (worsening). At each visit, each component is given a score relative to baseline (BL): -1 if threshold is met for worsening, 0 if no changes meet threshold criteria, or +1 if threshold is met for improvement. For T25FW and 9HPT improvement is =15% decrease in time from BL and worsening is =15% increase in time from BL. For EDSS, improvement is: =1.0-point decrease in EDSS from a BL score of =6.0, and worsening is defined as a =1-point increase from a BL score of =5.5 or a =0.5-point increase from a BL score equal to 6.0. Positive Overall Response Score indicated that there was improvement in more components than there was worsening. | Part 1: Baseline to Week 72 | |
Primary | Part 2: Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. A SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, life-threatening event, requires inpatient hospitalization, significant disability/incapacity or congenital anomaly. | Part 2: Baseline to Week 169 | |
Secondary | Part 1: Percentage of Participants With 12-week Confirmed Improvement in at Least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, or 9HPT-ND | EDSS measures disability status over time in MS on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more disability. For EDSS, improvement is defined as a =1.0-point decrease in EDSS from a BL score of =6.0. T25FW is a quantitative mobility and leg function performance test based on a timed walk over 25 feet that is averaged between two completed trials. Longer time indicates slower walking. The 9HPT is a quantitative test of upper extremity function that measures the time it takes to place 9 pegs into 9 holes and then remove the pegs. Longer time indicates poorer upper limb function. For T25FW and 9HPT =15% decrease in time from BL indicates improvement. | Part 1: Baseline to Week 72 | |
Secondary | Part 1: Percentage of Participants With 12-week Confirmed Improvement in at Least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, 9HPT-ND, or 3-Second Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT-3) | EDSS measures disability status over time in MS (scale range: 0-10), higher scores=more disability and improvement defined as =1.0-point decrease in EDSS from BL score =6.0. T25FW is quantitative mobility and leg function performance test, where timed walk over 25 feet that is averaged between two completed trials. Longer time=slower walking. 9HPT is quantitative test of upper extremity function, measures time to place 9 pegs into 9 holes and then remove pegs. Longer time=poorer upper limb function. PASAT assesses auditory information processing speed. In 3-second PASAT, numbers are presented at a rate of 1 every 3 seconds with scores (range 0-120), higher scores=better working memory. For T25FW and 9HPT =15% decrease in time from BL is improvement. For PASAT =15% increase from BL is improvement. | Part 1: Baseline to Week 72 | |
Secondary | Part 1: Percentage of Participants With 12-week Confirmed Improvement in at Least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, or 9HPT-ND, and Without Confirmed Worsening in Any of the 4 Assessments During the 72 Weeks of the Study | EDSS measures disability status over time in MS on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more disability. For EDSS, improvement is defined as a =1.0-point decrease in EDSS from a BL score of =6.0, and worsening is defined as a =1-point increase from a BL score of =5.5 or a =0.5-point increase from a BL score equal to 6.0. T25FW is a quantitative mobility and leg function performance test based on a timed walk over 25 feet that is averaged between two completed trials. Longer time indicates slower walking. The 9HPT is a quantitative test of upper extremity function that measures the time it takes to place 9 pegs into 9 holes and then remove the pegs. Longer time indicates poorer upper limb function. For T25FW and 9HPT =15% decrease in time from BL indicates improvement and =15% increase in time from BL indicates worsening. | Part 1: Baseline to Week 72 | |
Secondary | Part 1: Percentage of Participants With 12-week Confirmed Improvement in at Least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, 9HPT-ND, and Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) | EDSS measures disability status over time in MS on a scale (range 0-10), higher scores=more disability. For EDSS, improvement is: a =1.0-point decrease in EDSS from a BL score of =6.0. T25FW is a quantitative mobility and leg function performance test based on a timed walk over 25 feet that is averaged between two completed trials. Longer time=slower walking. 9HPT is quantitative test of upper extremity function that measures time it takes to place 9 pegs into 9 holes and then remove pegs. Longer time=poorer upper limb function. For T25FW and 9HPT =15% decrease in time from BL indicates improvement. The SDMT measures time to pair abstract geometric symbols with specific numbers. The score is the number of correctly coded items (range 0-110) in 90 seconds, higher scores=better outcome. Improvement is: =4-point increase from BL. | Part 1: Baseline to Week 72 | |
Secondary | Part 1: Percentage of Participants With 12-week Confirmed Improvement in at Least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, or 9HPT-ND (20% Thresholds for T25FW and 9HPT) | EDSS measures disability status over time in MS on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more disability. For EDSS, improvement is defined as a =1.0-point decrease in EDSS from a BL score of =6.0. T25FW is a quantitative mobility and leg function performance test based on a timed walk over 25 feet that is averaged between two completed trials. Longer time indicates slower walking. The 9HPT is a quantitative test of upper extremity function that measures the time it takes to place 9 pegs into 9 holes and then remove the pegs. Longer time indicates poorer upper limb function. For T25FW and 9HPT =15% decrease in time from BL indicates improvement. | Part 1: Baseline to Week 72 | |
Secondary | Part 2: Overall Response Score | Part 2: Baseline to Week 96 | ||
Secondary | Part 2: Percentage of Participants With 24-week Confirmed Improvement in at Least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, or 9HPT-ND | Part 2: Baseline to Week 108 | ||
Secondary | Part 2: Percentage of Participants With 24-week Confirmed Improvement in at Least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, 9HPT-ND, or PASAT-3 | Part 2: Baseline to Week 108 | ||
Secondary | Part 2: Percentage of Participants With 24-week Confirmed Improvement in at Least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, or 9HPT-ND, and Without Confirmed Worsening in Any of the 4 Assessments During the 96 Weeks of the Study | Part 2: Baseline to Week 96 | ||
Secondary | Part 2: Percentage of Participants With 24-week Confirmed Improvement in at Least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, 9HPT-ND, and SDMT | Part 2: Baseline to Week 108 | ||
Secondary | Part 2: Percentage of Participants With 24-week Confirmed Improvement in at Least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, or 9HPT-ND (20% Thresholds for T25FW and 9HPT) | Part 2: Baseline to Week 108 | ||
Secondary | Part 2: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values | Laboratory assessments including hematology and blood chemistry were evaluated for safety. Criteria for abnormality: In 10^9/liter (L) [white blood cells <3.0/>16, neutrophils <1.5/ >13.5, lymphocytes <0.8/ >12, monocytes >2.5, eosinophils >1.6, basophils >1.6, platelets <=75/ >=700], hemoglobin <=95 [female (F)] or <=115 [male (M)] or >=175 (F) or >=190 (M) gram per liter (g/L), hematocrit <=32 (F) or <=37 (M) or >=54 (F) or >=60 (M) percentage (%), red blood cells <=3.5/ >=6.4 10^12/L, in millimoles per liter (mmol/L) [sodium <=126/ >=156, potassium <=3/ >=6, chloride <=90/ >=118, bicarbonate <=16/ >=35, calcium <=2/ >=3, phosphorous <=0.5491/ >=1.7119, glucose (non-fasting) <=2.2/>=13.75], AST/SGOT >=3x upper limit of normal (ULN), ALT/SGPT >=3xULN, alkaline phosphatase >=3xULN, creatinine >=1.5xULN, total bilirubin >=1.5xULN, total protein <=45/ >=100 g/L, albumin <=25 g/L, uric acid >=501.5 (F)/>=619.5 (M) micromole (umol)/L | Part 2: Baseline to Week 96 | |
Secondary | Part 2: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values | The ECG result was classified as "normal", "abnormal", "abnormal, not adverse event", or "abnormal, adverse event". Shift to 'abnormal, not adverse event' included shift from normal or unknown to 'abnormal, not adverse event'. Shift to 'abnormal, adverse event' included shift from normal or unknown to 'abnormal, adverse event'. | Part 2: Baseline to Week 96 | |
Secondary | Part 2: Percentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values | Vital sign measurements including temperature, pulse rate (supine), systolic blood pressure (BP) and diastolic (supine) BP were evaluated for safety. Criteria for abnormalities: Temperature: >38 degree celsius (?C) or >=1 ?C increase from baseline (BL); Pulse: [>100 beats per minute (bpm) or increase from BL of >30 bpm] or (<40 bpm or decrease from BL of >20 bpm); Systolic BP: [>160 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)/increase from BL of >40 mmHg] or (<90 mmHg/decrease from BL of >30 mmHg); Diastolic BP: (>100 mmHg/increase from BL of >30 mmHg) or (<45 mmHg/decrease from BL of >20 mmHg). | Part 2: Baseline to Week 96 | |
Secondary | Part 2: Percentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Weight Values | Criteria for abnormality was defined as a >7% increase or decrease in weight at the specified time point. | Part 2: Baseline, Week 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 | |
Secondary | Part 2: Number of Participants With Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Score at Any Post-Baseline Visit | C-SSRS systematically assess suicidal ideation and behavior rating scale. It rates an individual's degree of suicidal ideation on a scale, ranging from "wish to be dead" to "active suicidal ideation with specific plan and intent and behaviors". The scale identifies specific behaviors ranging from "preparatory acts or behavior" to "suicide" which may be indicative of an individual's intent to complete suicide. | Part 2: Baseline to Week 96 |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT05528666 -
Risk Perception in Multiple Sclerosis
|
||
Completed |
NCT03608527 -
Adaptive Plasticity Following Rehabilitation in Multiple Sclerosis
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05532943 -
Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Allogeneic Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02486640 -
Evaluation of Potential Predictors of Adherence by Investigating a Representative Cohort of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Patients in Germany Treated With Betaferon
|
||
Completed |
NCT01324232 -
Safety and Efficacy of AVP-923 in the Treatment of Central Neuropathic Pain in Multiple Sclerosis
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04546698 -
5-HT7 Receptor Implication in Inflammatory Mechanisms in Multiple Sclerosis
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04380220 -
Coagulation/Complement Activation and Cerebral Hypoperfusion in Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis
|
||
Completed |
NCT02835677 -
Integrating Caregiver Support Into MS Care
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03686826 -
Feasibility and Reliability of Multimodal Evoked Potentials
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05964829 -
Impact of the Cionic Neural Sleeve on Mobility in Multiple Sclerosis
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT06021561 -
Orofacial Pain in Multiple Sclerosis
|
||
Completed |
NCT03653585 -
Cortical Lesions in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04798651 -
Pathogenicity of B and CD4 T Cell Subsets in Multiple Sclerosis
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05054140 -
Study to Evaluate Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of IMU-838 in Patients With Progressive Multiple Sclerosis
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT05447143 -
Effect of Home Exercise Program on Various Parameters in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06195644 -
Effect of Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation on Cortical Excitability and Hand Dexterity in Multiple Sclerosis Patients
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT04147052 -
iSLEEPms: An Internet-Delivered Intervention for Sleep Disturbance in Multiple Sclerosis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03591809 -
Combined Exercise Training in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03594357 -
Cognitive Functions in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis
|
||
Completed |
NCT03269175 -
BENEFIT 15 Long-term Follow-up Study of the BENEFIT and BENEFIT Follow-up Studies
|
Phase 4 |