A Multicentre Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Supplementary Treatment With Cholecalciferol in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Treated With Subcutaneous Interferon Beta-1a 44 µg 3 Times Weekly

Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Trial

— CHOLINE  

Official title:

A Multicentre, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of the Efficacy of Supplementary Treatment With Cholecalciferol (Vitamin D3) in Patients With Relapsing- Multiple Sclerosis (RMS) Treated With Subcutaneous Interferon Beta-1a 44 µg 3 Times Weekly

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT01198132
• Other study ID #: 701068-524
• Secondary ID: 2009-013695-46
• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 2
• First received: September 8, 2010
• Last updated: May 9, 2017
• Start date: November 2009
• Est. completion date: November 2015

Study information

• Verified date: May 2017
• Source: Merck KGaA
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The aim of this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of supplementary treatment with cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) in subjects with relapsing multiple sclerosis (R MS) treated with subcutaneous (s.c.) interferon beta-1a 44 microgram (mcg) [Rebif] 3 times weekly. The subjects will be divided into 2 groups, one receiving cholecalciferol 100,000 IU twice monthly along with Rebif treatment and the other group will be on placebo along with Rebif treatment. A total of 200 subjects will be recruited in 20-30 centres in France.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 129
• Est. completion date: November 2015
• Est. primary completion date: March 2015
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 65 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Diagnosis of RRMS according to Poser criteria (clinically definite multiple sclerosis [CDMS] or laboratory supported definite multiple sclerosis [LSDMS]) or according to McDonald criteria (2005).

• Subjects aged between 18 and 65 years.

• Treated with interferon beta-1a 44 mcg (or 22 mcg in case of intolerance to 44 mcg) 3 times weekly subcutaneously for 4 months ± (2 months) at the randomization visit (V1).

• Expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score between 0 and 5.

• At least one documented episode during the last two year.

• Stable disease with no episodes over the last 30 days.

• Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D less than (<) 75 nanomolar per liter (nmol/l) at randomization visit.

• Women must not be pregnant or breast-feeding, and women of childbearing age must meet the following criteria:

• Surgically sterilised, or

• Using a highly effective contraceptive method throughout the entire duration of the study. A highly effective contraceptive method is defined as a method with a very low failure rate (i.e. < 1 % per year) with regular and appropriate use, e.g. implants, injectable contraceptives, combined oral contraceptives, coil, abstinence or vasectomised partner.

• Menopausal women may be included.

• Affiliated to French healthcare insurance.

• Subjects must be ready and able to provide informed consent and comply with the protocol requirements.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Hormonal abnormalities associated with vitamin D other than low dietary intake or reduced exposure to sun, for example malabsorption (coeliac disease, Whipple's disease, inflammatory bowel disease, intestinal derivation, short bowel syndrome), cirrhosis, nephrotic syndrome, hyperthyroidism, rickets, hypoparathyroidism, cancer, granulomatous diseases (sarcoidosis, silicosis) and lymphomas known at the initial visit.

• Patients with osteoporosis or known osteopenia.

• Use of medicines affecting vitamin D metabolism other than corticosteroids, e.g. anticonvulsants (phenobarbital, primidone, phenytoin), rifampicin, isoniazid, ketoconazole, 5-FU and leucovorin, or thiazide diuretics.

• Previous or ongoing hypercalcaemia.

• Situations involving increased susceptibility to hypercalcaemia, e.g. known cardiac arrhythmia or cardiac disease, treatment with digitalis, renal lithiasis.

• Any contraindication to the treatment (cholecalciferol) stated in the summary of product characteristics.

• Moderate renal impairment defined as creatinine clearance between 30 and 60 ml/min.

• An active episode during the month prior to inclusion in the study.

• Inadequate liver function, defined as total bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or alkaline phosphatase greater than (>) 2.5 * upper limit of normal.

• Severe renal impairment defined as creatinine clearance below 30 milliliter per minute (ml/min).

• Inadequate marrow reserves, defined as white blood cells < 0.5 * lower limit of normal.

• Serious or acute heart disease such as uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia, uncontrolled angina, cardiomyopathy or uncontrolled congestive heart failure.

• History of severe depression, or attempted suicide or ongoing suicidal ideation.

• Epilepsy inadequately controlled by treatment.

• Ongoing or previous alcohol or drug abuse (within the last two years).

• Major medical or psychiatric disease which, in the opinion of investigator, would place the subject at risk or could adversely affect compliance with the study protocol.

• Known hypersensitivity to gadolinium and/or known inability to undergo MRI.

• Any medical condition requiring chronic treatment with systemic corticosteroids.

• Participation in any other studies involving other study products over the 30 days prior to inclusion in this study.

• Legal incapacity or limited legal capacity.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Multiple Sclerosis
• Sclerosis

Intervention

Dietary Supplement:
• Cholecalciferol (Vitamin D3)
Subjects receive Cholecalciferol 100,000 IU one dose fortnightly (equivalent to a daily dose of approximately 7142 IU) for 96 weeks treatment period along with subcutaneous Rebif 44 mcg 3 times a week.
• Placebo
Subjects receive matching placebo to Cholecalciferol once every two weeks orally along with subcutaneous injection of Rebif 44 mcg 3 times weekly.

Drug:
• Rebif
Subjects receive subcutaneous injection of Rebif 44 mcg 3 times weekly.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
France	CHU Hôpital Gui de Chauliac Service de Neurologie B	Montpellier

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Merck KGaA	Merck Serono S.A.S, France

Country where clinical trial is conducted

France, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Annualized Relapse Rate	The annualized relapse rate was calculated for each treatment group as follows: the number of relapses observed during the study period divided by the time spent in the study (in years).	2 years post treatment (IMP) administration
Secondary	Time to First Documented Relapse	Time to First Documented Relapse was calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival methods.	2 years post treatment (IMP) administration
Secondary	Mean Number of Relapses Per Subject	Relapse was defined as new, worsening or recurrent neurological symptoms attributed to multiple sclerosis that last for at least 24 hours without fever or infection, or adverse reaction to prescribed medication, preceded by a stable or improving neurological status of at least 30 days. Mean and standard deviation were reported.	2 years post treatment (IMP) administration
Secondary	Number of Relapse-Free (Documented) Subjects	The relapse-free patients after 2 years of treatment was calculated using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test using the site as control variable.	2 years post treatment (IMP) administration
Secondary	Cumulative Probability of Progression of Disability (Kaplan-Meier Curves)	Disability progression was assessed using Expanded disability status scale (EDSS). EDSS assesses disability in 8 functional systems. An overall score ranging from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS) was calculated. A one-point increase on the EDSS scale was considered as a progression in disability. The time to disability progression was summarized using Kaplan-Meier survival methods. The cumulative probability of confirmed disease progression at each visit was obtained by applying a Kaplan-Meier method to the time to confirmed disease progression.	Baseline up to week 96
Secondary	Number of New or Extended Lesions by T1- and T2-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)		2 years post treatment (IMP) administration
Secondary	Changes From Baseline in Measured Lesion Load (T2)	Baseline defined as last value recorded prior to first intake of study drug.	Baseline, Week 96
Secondary	Change From Baseline in Measurement and Evaluation of Cognitive Ability by Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task (PASAT) Total Score At Week 96	The Adapted Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task (PASAT) is a measure of cognitive function that specifically assesses auditory information processing speed and flexibility, as well as calculation ability. The total score for PASAT is the total number of correct answers (out of 60, for a total possible score ranging from 0-60 with higher score indicates higher auditory processing speed) for each trial. Change from baseline in PASAT total score at Week 96 was summarized.	Baseline, Week 96
Secondary	Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life Scale (EuroQol) 5-Dimension-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L)	The EQ-5D health questionnaire is a generic self-reported health-related quality of life instrument that includes a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to measure the general health state, as well as 5 items corresponding to one dimension each: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. In this study, the VAS scale is not collected and the version 3L of the scale was used: Each dimension had 3 possible levels: 1 = no problem, 2 = some problems and 3 = extreme problems. EQ-5D-3L weighted health state index exists that combines the score of the 5 dimensions and ranges from 0 to 1 (full health). The variables for the 5 dimensions of the EQ-5D descriptive system was named 'mobility','selfcare', 'activity', 'pain', and 'anxiety'. The 5 variables contained the values for the different dimensions in the EQ-5D health profile (i.e. 1, 2, or 3).	2 years post treatment (IMP) administration
Secondary	Number of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Abnormal Clinical Laboratory	A serious TEAE was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect and TEAE was defined as newly occurring or worsening after first dose. Clinical laboratory abnormalities are expected to be reported as adverse events if they met any criterion for seriousness, led to treatment discontinuation, required a medical intervention or were considered clinically significant by the investigator.	Baseline up to end of treatment (week 96)