View clinical trials related to Multiple Sclerosis.
Filter by:Several prospective monocentric cohorts of between 250 and 1000 patients have been set up in order to characterize more precisely the evolution of the disease. Nevertheless, due to an initial recruitment carried out in the years 2000-2010, they do not constitute a faithful representation of the patients followed in clinical routine, in particular in terms of distribution of treatments. Indeed, the introduction, about 10 years ago, of high efficacy treatments (HET) has changed the management of the disease and a significant proportion of patients not controlled by medium efficacy treatments (MET) of the disease are now stable on HET. Nevertheless, if their short-term efficacy has been clearly demonstrated, it remains important to be able to confirm the superiority of HET over MET with the help of prospective cohorts (thus ensuring a retention of patients > 90% over the long term) analyzing all clinical and imaging biomarkers, imaging and biological data. The measurement of cerebral atrophy and its progression is probably one of the most interesting and most easily used biomarkers that can be used clinically to assess this silent progression in these groups of patients. The progression of brain atrophy is also dependent on many other non-modifiable but also modifiable factors outside of MS that need to be better evaluated and eventually managed. Nevertheless, the existence of various neurological comorbidities (sleep disorders, headaches) on this atrophy has not been specifically analyzed to date. The functional assessments used in routine follow-up are most often performed in a care facility and have many limitations: lack of reproducibility, inter/intra operator variability, poor correlation with functional and quality of life scales, etc. It is therefore extremely important to be able to identify new clinical biomarkers of disease progression of the disease by evaluating the physical capacities of the patients as precisely as possible. This study is a single-center, prospective cohort study of a population of 400 patients with relapsing remitting MS (RRMS). The main objective of this study is to compare, on morphological imaging criteria (T1 volumetry), the progression of brain atrophy (biomarker of disease progression) at 3 years in RRMS patients according to treatment line (MET vs HET).
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of subcutaneously administered cladribine versus placebo to stop inflammation and treat disease progression of non-active secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Multiple sclerosis is an inflammatory disease of the central nervous system. In most patients, it starts with a relapsing course (RMS) which is caused by acute inflammatory lesions in the brain and spinal cord. RMS transforms at later stages into progressive disease (secondary progressive MS). Currently approved disease-modifying treatments are effective in reducing clinical relapses and brain and spinal lesions visible in MR, but they perform poorly in preventing disease progression and overall disability accumulation. The growing evidence shows that disease progression partially depends on chronic inflammation present in the CNS. Drugs, which may cross the blood-brain barrier and reach inflammatory cells residing in the CNS might be effective in this stage of the disease. Cladribine is one of the DMT approved for RMS. It is a synthetic purine analog with selective lymphocyte toxicity, which enter the CNS and is found in cerebrospinal fluid. In patients treated with cladribine, the oligoclonal bands tend to disappear proving that neuroinflammation is diminished. The participants of this clinical trial with the later non-active stage of MS are enrolled to be treated with cladribine subcutaneously or a non-active comparator (placebo) for 6 months and followed for the next 2 years, with an MRI scan and clinical evaluation every 6 months. The main questions it aims to answer are if in the non-active stage of MS cladribine is potent to lessen brain volume loss and if it is potent to attenuate inflammation in the CNS.
The purpose of the study is to test whether low level electric stimulation, called transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS), on the part of the brain (i.e., presupplementary motor area) thought to aid in memory will improve verbal retrieval in multiple sclerosis patients. The primary outcome measures are neuropsychological assessments of verbal retrieval, and the secondary measures are neuropsychological assessments of other cognitive abilities and electroencephalography (EEG) measures. Additionally, the study will examine the degree to which baseline assessments of cognition and concussion history predict responses to treatment over time, both on assessments administered within the intervention period and at follow-up.
the effectiveness of structured exercise training will be investigated for individuals with MS who are newly diagnosed and have no clinical problems. Individuals with MS included in the study will be randomly divided into two groups a Structured Exercise Group (SEG) and a Control Group (CG). In order to compare baseline and follow-up data, the Healthy Group (HG) will be taken and all three groups will be evaluated initially, 8. weeks and 24. weeks with primary and secondary outcome measurements. SEG, CG, and HG will be evaluated initially for postural sway, muscle strength, mobility, dexterity, cognitive function, trunk strength-endurance, and fatigue. Afterward, SEG will receive structured exercise training consisting of clinically supervised aerobic exercise and resistance training on unstable surfaces for 8 weeks, 2 days a week, with a minimum session duration of 60 minutes. Stretching and mobility exercises will be added to warm up and cool down before and after the program. CG will be on the waiting list during this process. At the end of 8 weeks, both groups will be reassessed with their initial assessment. After the 8-week program, the SEG physical activity recommendation will be given and the KG group will continue on the waiting list, and a follow-up evaluation will be made in the 24th week. This study will allow the comparison of newly diagnosed individuals with MS who do not have any physical or cognitive effects on neurological examination and healthy controls with objective and detailed evaluations, and will also reveal the evidence on the effects of planned structured exercises specific to individuals with newly diagnosed MS. During the 24-week follow-up period, the change in the clinical status of individuals with MS who received or did not receive any exercise training can be interpreted.
In this study, we are aiming to systematically review the literature on the effect of HIIT on MS patients as improving physical performance, cognitive function, aerobic fitness and muscle strength. This could help guide the development of standardized clinical guidelines and direct clinical decision making by the physical therapists whether to implement this type of exercises or not.
The primary objectives of this study is to examine the efficacy of the Unified Protocol in decreasing depression and anxiety among individuals with MS and the secondary outcomes (e.g., improved well-being, QOL, coping, etc.) that may occur in tandem.
Individuals with and without neurologic diagnoses greatly benefit from participation in regular exercise but the majority are physically inactive. This is an issue for both them and their care partners as their health is often linked. This study aims to examine the long-term physical and psychosocial effects of structured, group-based, high intensity functional training (HIFT) exercise for people with neurologic diagnoses and their care partners.
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory and degenerative disease of the central nervous system (CNS), characterized by a complex interplay of inflammatory demyelination and neuronal damage. The core MS phenotypes defined by clinical course are the relapsing and the progressive forms.Relapsing MS (RMS) is characterized by attacks - also called relapses - defined as new or increasing neurologic dysfunction, followed by periods of partial or complete recovery, without apparent progression of the disease during the periods of remission. In contrast, progressive MS (PMS) is characterized by progressive worsening of neurologic function leading to accumulation of disability over time independent of relapses. Additional descriptors ("active/not-active") serve to better characterize the presence of clinical and/or radiological activity both in relapsing and progressive forms. In recent years, the concept of a silent progression, also known as smouldering MS, is making its way into the common lexicon of MS experts, challenging the current definitions of MS phenotypes. A growing body of literature suggests that the line between RMS and PMS is not as marked as men thought, and that inflammation and neurodegeneration can represent a single disease continuum coexisting early on in the disease course. Whilst it is established that relapse-associated worsening (RAW) can be accounted for by an acute inflammatory focal damage leading to axonal transection and conduction block, the physiopathology underlying the progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) remains unclear. It is becoming apparent that there is an increasing need for a personalized therapeutic approach by considering the individual MS phenotype of each patient, thereby enabling the choice of the molecule best suited to counteract the predominant disease pattern of that individual patient. There is a limited number of studies combining clinical scores, neurophysiological evaluation and neuroimaging in patients with MS experiencing PIRA. Integrating a multimodal exploration of these patients might allow a step forward in the early recognition, management, and treatment of disability accumulation independent from relapses in patients with MS.
The goal of this clinical trial is to test an Online DBT-Mindfulness intervention in people with Multiple Sclerosis. The results of the online DBT-Mindfulness intervention will be compared to an active control group (psychoeducational intervention) to see if they improve her emotion dysregulation and decentering, and consequently, this benefits also improve symptoms like anxiety, depression, distress, fatigue and quality of life in people with MS.
The aim of this thesis study is to examine whether plantar sensory training given in addition to aerobic exercise training has an additional contribution to balance, functional capacity, walking and proprioception in patients with multiple sclerosis. In this direction, the hypotheses of the study are stated below. H0 hypothesis: Plantar sensory training given in addition to aerobic exercise training in patients with multiple sclerosis has no additional contribution to balance, functional capacity, walking and proprioception. H1 hypothesis: Plantar sensory training given in addition to aerobic exercise training in patients with multiple sclerosis has an additional contribution to balance, functional capacity, walking and proprioception. Conventional exercises (with the addition of warm-up and cool-down periods) will be applied to all multiple sclerosis patients participating in the study; In addition, aerobic exercise training will be given. In addition to these exercises, plantar sensory training will be given to the sensory training group. Exercises and plantar sensory training will be given to the participants at intervals of three weeks, with progressively progressive sessions, 2 days a week for 12 weeks. Patients will be evaluated twice, before treatment and at the end of treatment 12 weeks later. Within the scope of the evaluation, balance, functional capacity, gait, proprioception and plantar sensory parameters will be measured in patients. As a result of the study, it will be examined whether plantar sensory training given in addition to aerobic exercise training in multiple sclerosis patients has an additional contribution to balance, functional capacity, walking and proprioception. There is no study in the literature examining the effects of plantar sensory training and aerobic exercise training on balance, functional capacity, walking and proprioception in patients with multiple sclerosis. In this respect, it is anticipated that the study will contribute to the literature.