View clinical trials related to Multiple Myeloma in Relapse.
Filter by:This study aims to determine the safety and the recommended phase II dose of RYZ101 (actinium-225 labelled DOTA-octreotate (225Ac-DOTATATE)) in participants with refractory and relapsing multiple myeloma (MM) that have received at least 3 prior lines of myeloma therapy. Participants will be selected based on somatostatin receptor (SSTR) positivity assessed by gallium-68 labelled DOTA-octreotate (68Ga-DOTATATE) PET/CT. The response to 225Ac-DOTATATE therapy will also be assessed in the target study population.
Selinexor, a first-in-class, oral selective exportin 1 (XPO1) inhibitor, has shown promise in pre-clinical and clinical studies. It functions by inhibiting the nuclear export protein XPO1, resulting in the accumulation of tumor suppressor proteins and inhibition of oncoprotein mRNAs, which is selectively lethal to myeloma cells. Selinexor has demonstrated activity in combination with various drugs, including glucocorticoids and proteasome inhibitors, leading to its FDA approval for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.
A phase 2 study of venetoclax in combination with isatuximab and dexamethasone for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients with t(11;14)
This study aims to study the efficacy and safety of oral cyclophosphamide in addition to carfilzomib and dexamethadone for RRMM patients who have been previously exposed to lenalidomide combination therapies.
This is a phase 1/2, open label, single-center study designed to assess the safety and preliminary clinical activity of different belantamab mafodotin doses in combination with daratumumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone (DPd) in patients with Relapsed/ Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) previously treated with one line of therapy who are lenalidomide refractory. This will be a 2-Part study. Part 1 will evaluate the safety of belantamab mafodotin in combination with DPd in 2 cohorts and determine the Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D). In the dose expansion phase (Part 2) an expansion cohort will be treated with the RP2D. The expansion cohort will randomize participants (1:1) in two groups to evaluate two alternate dose modification guidelines for corneal AEs. Part 2 will further evaluate the safety and assess the preliminary clinical activity of the belantamab mafodotin RP2D in combination with DPd. Overall, approximately 48 participants will be enrolled in the study. Participant follow-up will continue up to 3 years after the last participant is randomized. The estimated accrual period will be 12 months corresponding to an approximate total study duration of 4 years.
Pomalidomide either as single therapy or in combination with cyclophosphamide, elotuzumab, bortezomib, or daratumumab are effective treatment regimens in relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Standard dosing is 4 mg/day during 21 days of a 28-day cycle (21/28). However, a clear dose-response association for pomalidomide in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) is lacking. There is data supporting that a dose of 2 mg/day continuously (28/28) induces fewer side effects while efficacy is preserved, compared to 4 mg/day continuously. The response in patients who received pomalidomide 2 mg per day compared to 4 mg per day was higher, with a longer duration of response. In addition, a randomized phase II study showed no difference in efficacy between 4 mg (21/28) and 4 mg continuously. These clinical studies support that a dosage of pomalidomide of 2 mg (28/28) is at least comparable with a dosage of 4 mg (21/28). It is not known if 4 mg every other day (EOD) is comparable to a dosage of pomalidomide 2 mg (28/28) or 4 mg every day (QD, 21/28). For cost reasons, this is interesting as the costs of pomalidomide 4 mg and 2 mg are comparable. Therefore, from a patient and societal perspective, the investigators want to explore if an alternative scheme would be possible by performing a PKPD bio-equivalence pilot study.
Research question: Is KRd therapy effective and safe in the real-world Asian patients? Primay objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of KRd in RRMM patients Secondary objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of investigational treatment strategy by - PFS difference according to the high-risk disease subgroups and previous treatment - OS - Overall response rate and clinical benefit rate - Duration of response To evaluate the safety and tolerability of KRd in RRMM patients
This research is being done to test whether the investigational drug marizomib is safe and effective when used in combination with standard of care drugs for the treatment of multiple myeloma.
The primary objective of this study, sponsored by Travera in Massachusetts, is to validate whether the mass response biomarker has potential to predict response of patients to specific therapies or therapeutic combinations using isolated tumor cells from varying cancers and biopsy formats.
The goal of this clinical trial is to study the feasibility and efficacy of anti-CD19/BCMA bispecific chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) T cell therapy for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma.