View clinical trials related to Morbid Obesity.
Filter by:The study will compare agreement of invasive blood pressure measurements with non-invasive blood pressure measurements measured with a conical blood pressure and large standard upper arm rectangular cuff in morbidly obese severely hypertensive (systolic blood pressure > 160 mmHg) parturients.
Although peroperative intravenous lidocaine has been shown to be useful in early recovery after colorectal surgery, its beneficial effect on the specific population of obese patients scheduled for bariatric surgery remained unknown. Investigators hypothesized that peroperative intravenous lidocaine could decrease postoperative opioid consumption and improve postoperative recovery
While bariatric surgery is established as a safe and effective alternative with well-defined risks for severely obese adults, little has been published on its use in children. There are many unresolved questions concerning the long-term metabolic and psychological consequences of bariatric surgery in adolescents, and the difference with the adult population. The appropriate timing for bariatric surgery in young people, and the predictors of success and safety still need to be determined. The aim of this long-term prospective study is therefore to establish the safety and efficacy profile of surgical procedures and to clarify whether reductions in morbidity and mortality outweigh the risks of serious surgical complications and lifelong nutritional deficiencies.
The aim of this study is to compare two postoperative recovery pathways namely, enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway and conventional recovery pathway after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with respect to outcomes including hospital stay, postoperative pain and other postoperative outcomes.
Obesity and its associated diseases are increasing worldwide. However, the mechanisms behind the development of obesity is not fully understood. There is evidence that intestinal bacteria may play a role in the development and perpetuation of obesity through regulation of energy and fat storage. Bariatric surgery is currently the most effective modality for treating severe obesity with evidence to support long-term sustained weight loss and improvement in obesity-related comorbidities. The two most commonly performed bariatric surgical procedures are the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG). RYGB leads to greater weight loss than SG and improved diabetes control in patients following surgery. Despite the success of RYGB and SG in inducing weight loss and improving comorbidities, the underlying mechanisms leading to clinical improvement following these operations is not completely understood. Multiple factors are thought to play a role including reduced caloric intake, decreased nutrient absorption, increased satiety, release of hormones and shifts in bile acid metabolism. Recent evidence has suggested that the gut bacteria mediates a number of the beneficial effects of bariatric surgery. Small studies have demonstrated changes in the composition and diversity of the gut microbiota after RYGB and SG in humans. One study also confirmed long-term microbial changes for RYGB. However, comparative trials have been small (less than 15 participants per treatment group) and important differences between specific bacterial populations have not been well elucidated. Furthermore, no human study has examined the differences in bacterial composition following RYGB and SG in relation to their metabolic consequences. The aim of this study is to investigate and compare the metabolic and microbial changes that occur with RYGB, SG, and dietary controls. Specifically, the investigators aim to use a systems biology approach utilizing powerful analytic techniques including metagenomics, metabolomics, and multiplex immune profiling to define the combined microbial, metabolic and immunologic changes that occur after bariatric surgery.
The purpose of this study is to investigate harmful effects of intentional weight loss. Intentional weight loss has been linked to increased risk of cardiovascular disease in overweight individuals, but the link between intentional weight loss and thrombotic disease is poorly understood. Postprandial coagulation activation, including thrombin generation, is a potential mechanism after high-fat meals. Thirty obese patients admitted to gastric bypass will be included in a randomized, cross-over clinical trial. All patients will consume a high-fat meal and a low-fat meal served in a randomized order on two study days (two to seven days apart). This cross-over study will be carried out before weight loss, during lifestyle-induced weight loss, and during weight loss 3-4 months after gastric bypass. Fasting and postprandial blood samples are collected on each study days, while one fecal sample is collected for each study period. The study will contribute to our understanding of mechanisms underlying harmful effects of weight loss, and future, dietary guidelines in relation to intentional weight loss programs must be modified.
This study will assess the efficacy of OnQ pain catheters in pain reduction in the bariatric surgical population and seeks to identify if a quantifiable improved post-operative course occurs in patients receiving a catheter filled with local anesthetic versus that achieved by patients who receive a catheter filled with injectable saline.
The gastric bypass procedure is known to be one of the most successful treatments for morbid obesity and Type 2 diabetes mellitus, and has been shown to decrease appetite, energy intake, body weight and glycemia both in the short and long term. A number of reports hypothesise that these changes may be driven, at least in part, by positive shifts in food preferences following surgery. However, findings are drawn from self-reported dietary intakes which are beset with measurement bias, thus precluding definite conclusions. The current work aims to directly observe food intake to test the hypothesis that after gastric bypass food intake changes in a manner which leads to beneficial outcomes on body weight when compared to weight stable control participants. Patients (n=32) with a planned gastric bypass procedure will be recruited from Phoenix Health (Ireland and England) and Letterkenny University Hospital (Ireland), alongside control participants (n=32) with no planned weight loss. All subjects will attend the Human Intervention Studies Unit (HISU), Ulster University on five occasions (1-month pre-surgery and 3, 12, 24 and 60 months post-surgery, with controls being time-matched). Study visits will be fully residential involving two overnight stays within the facility during which participants' 24-hour food intake will be covertly measured (7am-11pm Day 2 and breakfast Day 3) and the following procedures undertaken; basal metabolic rate, body composition, bone health, assessment of liking/wanting high fat foods and post-meal gut hormone responses. On each study visit participants will have ad lib access to a range of foods of varying macronutrient composition and which are compatible with their stated food preferences (assessed prior to the start of the study). Changes in all ingestive behaviours will be evaluated over time as compared to the control participants.
Because micafungin is generally well tolerated and appears to have limited interaction with other drugs, it is a potential important agent in the treatment of invasive fungal infections. Although micafungin is approved for the treatment of invasive candidiasis, dosing guidelines for micafungin in (morbidly) obese patients are not available. Subsequently, the pharmacokinetic profile of micafungin (as well as other echinocandins) in this specific patient population is still largely unknown. To build a valid pharmacokinetic model, obese patients with a BMI ≥ 40 undergoing endoscopic gastric bypass surgery will receive a single dose of 100 mg or 200mg micafungin (besides standard anti-bacterial prophylaxis) and samples for a pharmacokinetic curve will be taken. These PK-values can then be compared to the PK in a normal-weight group which will receive 100mg micafungin
The primary purpose of this study is to determine differences in block quality between the "dural-puncture epidural" (DPE) and standard epidural (EPL) techniques for labor analgesia in the morbidly obese patient. The investigators hypothesize that when compared to the standard EPL, the DPE technique will improve block quality . Study participants will be randomized by computer-generated sequence to EPL or DPE arms, stratified by class of obesity (BMI 35-39.9 kg/m2, 40< 50 kg/m2 and ≥ 50 kg/m2) and by parity (nulliparous versus multiparous). All patients will receive a neuraxial technique in the sitting position at L3/4 or L4/5 using loss of resistance to saline. In the DPE group, a 25-g Whitacre needle will be used to puncture the dura. In both groups, the epidural catheter will be threaded 5 cm in the epidural space with an initiation dose of 15 ml of ropivacaine 0.1% with fentanyl (2 mcg/ml) over 6 minutes as per standard practice. After the initial loading dose and epidural pump is started, the blinded investigator will enter the patient's room to start data collection (time 0). Data will be collected for the first 30 minutes of epidural placement at 3,6,9,12,15,18 21, and 30 minutes to detect the time to achieve target pain ≤ 1/10, then assessed at standardized times (ever 2 hour) until delivery. Breakthrough pain will be managed by a standardized protocol. Other data to be collected will include: catheter adjustments and replacements, physician top-ups, asymmetrical block, pain score, motor block, sensory level to ice, hypotension, total anesthetic dose required, and PCEA use. The primary outcome of this study is block quality defined by a composite of five components: (1) asymmetric block after 30 minutes of initiation, (2) top-up interventions, (3) catheter adjustments (4) failed catheter requiring replacement, and (5) failed epidural requiring general anesthesia or replacement neuraxial anesthesia for emergency cesarean section. Secondary outcomes include time to numeric pain rating scale ≤1, maternal adverse events (hypotension, fetal bradycardia, PDPH), motor block, duration of second stage of labor, total labor epidural time, total anesthetic dose required, PCEA use, and mode of delivery. There is no increased risk/safety issue with placing a dural puncture technique than with epidural for labor analgesia.