View clinical trials related to Missing Teeth.
Filter by:Commercially pure (CP) titanium is the gold standard to produce dental implants because it has a huge volume of scientific publications over a period of more than 50 years, it is cheap and simple to produce (i.e., making dental implants economically "affordable") and comes in numerous specitic designs of screws tor various indications. That is why more than 95% of the implant market 5 dominated by titanlum. However, there is an innovation trend to manufacture implants from more inert and biocompatible materials. Ceramic implants represent a valuable alternative for expanding the patient base of clinicians, especially in cases with challenging aesthetic demand. Furthermore, there has been a significant increase in the number of patients requesting metal-free dentistry or bio-holistic implant treatments. In the past, ceramics were often branded as "inferior" quality due to its reputation as being brittle but the growing volume of scientific publications specifically an zirconia are demonstrating that lt is comparable in fracture-strength with titanium implants. There is a clear market niche for zirconia implants, especially in cases of: - Aesthetic reconstructions in the anterior region, especially in patients with a thin gingival biotype - Gingival recessions where a white colored implant is a great advantage - For patients with a titanium intolerance/sensitivity - For patients who prefer a bio-holistic/metal-free dental approach. Today, clinicians are asking tor long-term clinical results of zirconia as a dental implant material. Therefore, Z-Systems AG is conducting this zirconia dental implant registry. A registry design was chosen because it will capture long-term benefits/risks from clinical routine without patient selection.
A within-subject cross-over study is done on eight completely edentulous patients to compare two different complete removable dentures. Group I: Heat cured Conventional complete dentures designed based on the neutral zone concept; Group II: CAD-CAM neutral zone complete dentures designed based on the neutral zone concept. Occlusal analysis is done by the T-Scan device, and evaluation of muscle activity is conducted by electromyography at insertion time, two weeks after insertion time, and one month after insertion time.
First, Participants in this study will be recruit according to inclusion criteria. Proper examination for the participants (clinically and radiographically). Preparation for abutment tooth for Resin bonded fixed partial denture. Checking and verification for the restoration (trying). Clinical assessment and survival evaluation of the final restoration on delivery and on follow-up every 12 weeks for 12 months.
The aim of the study is to prospectively evaluate the survival of JJGC Cobalt-Chromium (CoCr) prosthetic abutments in single-unit implant-supported prostheses, to confirm the long-term safety and performance of the devices.
Hybrid Funnel Technique arises from the union of subtractive and non-subtractive techniques for implant site preparation. Hybrid funnel technique is performed with specially designed drills and osteotome. the aim of the study is to examine marginal bone level and implant stability of implants inserted with two different techniques for the surgical implant site preparation.
In this case-control study a bioactive implant surface was compared with traditional surfaced implants. Primary objectives: Test the implant stability in post-extractive sites, comparing traditional surfaced implants (MultiNeO CS, control group) to bioactive surfaced implants (NINA- MultiNeO NH, treatment group). Primary outcome endpoints were Implant stability, assessed through Implant stability quotient (ISQ) values and Marginal bone loss (MBL)
Commercially pure (CP) titanium is the gold standard to produce dental implants because it has a huge volume of scientific publications over a period of more than 50 years, it is cheap and simple to produce (i.e., making dental implants economically "affordable") and comes in numerous specific designs of screws for various indications. That is why more than 95% of the implant market is dominated by titanium. However, there is an innovation trend to manufacture implants from more inert and biocompatible materials. Ceramic implants represent a valuable alternative for expanding the patient base of clinicians, especially in cases with challenging aesthetic demand. Furthermore, there has been a significant increase in the number of patients requesting metal-free dentistry or bio-holistic implant treatments. In the past, ceramics were often branded as "inferior" quality due to its reputation as being brittle but the growing volume of scientific publications specifically on zirconia are demonstrating that it is comparable in fracture-strength with titanium implants. There is a clear market niche for zirconia implants, especially in cases of: - Aesthetic reconstructions in the anterior region, especially in patients with a thin gingival biotype - Gingival recessions where a white colored implant is a great advantage - For patients with a titanium intolerance/sensitivity - For patients who prefer a bio-holistic/metal-free dental approach. Today, clinicians are asking for long-term clinical results of zirconia as a dental implant material. Therefore, Z-Systems AG is conducting this zirconia dental implant registry. A registry design was chosen because it will capture long-term benefits/risks from clinical routine without patient selection.
This study is about the assessment of two oral telemedecine tools compared to an intra oral clinical examination used as a reference among elderly persons living in nursing home. Our hyposthesis is that the diagnostic performance of the two devices will be similar. The main goal of the study is to assess the performances of two intra-oral cameras compared to an intra oral clinical examination to detect at least one decayed tooth. The secondary objectives of this study are : At patient's level: 1. To assess the performances of two intra-oral cameras types compared to an intra oral clinical examination for detecting each of the following conditions: (i) at least one filled tooth, (ii) at least one missing tooth, (iii) gingivitis, (iv) an abscess, (v) dental plaque and (vi) calculous 2. To assess the concordance between each intra oral cameras and the intra oral clinical examination in the evaluation of the number (i) of decayed teeth, (ii) filled teeth and (iii) missing tooth 3. From video acquisitions of each intra oral cameras, to assess the inter-observer concordance for the diagnostic of each dental pathologies (presence of at least one decayed tooth, filled or missing) and periodontal (presence of gingivitis, abscess, dental plaque or scale) 4. From video acquisitions of each intra oral cameras, to assess the inter-observer agreement of the number of teeth: (i) decayed, (ii) filled and (ii) missing At tooth level : 5. To assess the performances of two intra-oral cameras types compared to an intra oral clinical examination for detecting each of the following conditions: (i) a cavity, (ii) a filled tooth and (iii) missing tooth In all patients : 6. To assess patient's feelings about the use of each intra oral cameras 7. To compare the time required for video acquisitions between each of intra oral cameras For patients with dental or periodontal pathologies observed during the intra oral examination: 8 To assess, 2 months after initial evaluation, the proportion of patients attended dental or periodontal care and for which an appointment with a dentist has been scheduled
Intraoral oral scanning significantly improves scanning accuracy compared to digitized conventional impression techniques. The digitized closed tray impression technique showed significantly more accurate results than the digitized open-tray impression technique in partially edentulous patients.
Aim of the study is to examine the feasibility of dental implant insertion in patients receiving high, adjuvant and low dose > 4 years.