Evaluation of Microbial Growth on Bre-Flex Versus PEEK Denture Base in Bilateral Maxillary Bounded Partial Denture

Microbial Colonization Clinical Trial

Official title:

Evaluation of Microbial Growth on Bre-Flex Versus PEEK Denture Base in Bilateral Maxillary Bounded Partial Denture

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03491306
• Other study ID #: Peek vs Breflex
• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• First received: April 1, 2018
• Last updated: April 1, 2018
• Start date: June 1, 2018
• Est. completion date: July 15, 2018

Study information

• Verified date: April 2018
• Source: Cairo University
• Contact: Moataz Ibrahim
• Phone: 1286263775
• Email: moataz.hashim[@]dentistry.cu.edu.eg
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study evaluate Microbial growth on Bre-Flex versus PEEK denture base in Bilateral Maxillary bounded partial denture , half of patients will receive a framework with breflex denture base and the other half will receive a framework with PEEK denture base then evaluate the Candida growth

Description:

Peek and Bre.flex are both new material that introduced to the market recently with great benefits like aesthetics and bio-compatibility but which material has less candida growth ? Bre.flex is a nylon-based thermoplastic material, composed of nylon polyamide 12 (polyamide).Nylon exhibits high physical strength, heat resistance and chemical resistance. It can be easily modified to increase stiffness and wear resistance. Nylon resin can be semi-translucent and provides excellent esthetics but it is a little more difficult to adjust and polish.

Despite of its highly esthetics features, Nylon still suffers from surface roughness that increase the colonization for candida but less than heat cured acrylic Recently, PEEK is introduced as a removable prosthesis material due to its high mechanical and biological properties but further clinical studies or systematic reviews focusing on the use of PEEK dentures are needed.

The patient will be treated in visits designated as follows:

Visit 1: Preoperative records, clinical, radiographic examination (panoramic and periapical x-rays for evaluation the crown-root ratio, the apical condition of the abutment and their alveolar bone support of abutment) and primary impression will be performed with irreversible hydro-colloid impression material (alginate), The impressions will be poured with type IV dental stone to obtain diagnostic casts.

Visit 2: Maxillary Face-bow will be recorded. The diagnostic casts will be mounted on semi adjustable articulator in centric occluding relation to evaluate the inter arch distance and occlusal plane.

Visit 3: primary surveying is performed. Special trays will be constructed and Mouth preparation will be performed by preparing guiding planes and rests seats on the abutments. Final impression will be taken by elastomeric impression material. The impression will be poured into type IV dental stone in order to obtain master cast. The master cast will be surveyed. The proposed design will be as follows: framework for edentulous areas on both sides connected with palatal strap. Aker's clasp on all abutments with buccal retention.

Visit 4: the metal framework is tried into the patient's mouth. Jaw relation is recorded.

Visit 5: The framework will be tried in with acrylic teeth in patient's mouth. Visit 6: the denture base of the partial denture will be processed incorporation with the metal framework into the two different materials to be evaluated. The first group will receive the partial denture in which the metal framework incorporated with the denture base fabricated from PEEK material. The second group will receive the partial denture in which the metal framework incorporated with the denture base material fabricated from BRE-FLEX.

Visit7, 8, 9: clinical measurement will be performed for one month in three visits.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Enrollment: 18
• Est. completion date: July 15, 2018
• Est. primary completion date: June 15, 2018
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 35 Years to 55 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• i. All patients must have Kennedy class III modification I upper partially edentulous ridges.

ii. The remaining teeth have good periodontal condition, with no signs of attrition or gingival recession.

iii. Male or female patient with age range (30-55) and in good medical condition iv. All patients have skeletal Angle's class I maxillo-mandibular relationship and have sufficient interarch distance.

v. Free from any systemic or neuromuscular disorder that might affect chewing efficiency of masticatory muscles.

vi. Free from any tempro-mandibular joint disorder. vii. The patients have good oral hygiene and low caries index.

Exclusion Criteria:

• i. Patients having abnormal habits as bruxism or clenching ii. Patients having hormonal disorders as diabetes, thyroid or parathyroid hormonal diseases were not included.

iii. Teeth with compromised bone support. iv. Patient with xerostomia or excessive salivation. v. Patient with abnormal tongue behavior and/or size.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Communicable Diseases
• Infection
• Microbial Colonization

Intervention

Other:
• PEEK
PEEK has been successfully used over the last years in the medical ?eld, and orthopedics, speci?cally. which presents high bio compatibility, good mechanical properties, high temperature resistance, and chemical stability due to a 4 GPa modulus of elasticity, it is as elastic as bone and can reduce stresses transferred to the abutment teeth.Additional advantages of this polymer material are elimination of allergic reactions and metallic taste, high polishing qualities, low plaque af?nity, and good wear resistance, it has only recently been used in dentistry.
• Breflex
In the recent time thermoplastic materials become quite popular in clinical practice such as nylon and acetal resins. since the 1950, poly-amide resin (nylons) provide improved esthetics and reduction of rotational forces on the abutment teeth due to their low elastic modulus(3). The major disadvantage of a nylon removable denture is the inability for a reline procedure and the lack of occlusal rests as well as rigid frameworks, that could lead to occlusal instability and sinking, especially in Kennedy class I and II cases. On the other hand, acetal resins present adequate mechanical strength to form a frame-work more rigid than nylon with retentive clasps, connectors, and supportive elements; however, the acetal resin material lacks natural translucency and vitality.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Cairo University

References & Publications (4)

de Freitas Fernandes FS, Pereira-Cenci T, da Silva WJ, Filho AP, Straioto FG, Del Bel Cury AA. Efficacy of denture cleansers on Candida spp. biofilm formed on polyamide and polymethyl methacrylate resins. J Prosthet Dent. 2011 Jan;105(1):51-8. doi: 10.101 — View Citation

Guiotti AM, Goiato MC, Dos Santos DM, Vechiato-Filho AJ, Cunha BG, Paulini MB, Moreno A, de Almeida MT. Comparison of conventional and plant-extract disinfectant solutions on the hardness and color stability of a maxillofacial elastomer after artificial a — View Citation

Parvizi A, Lindquist T, Schneider R, Williamson D, Boyer D, Dawson DV. Comparison of the dimensional accuracy of injection-molded denture base materials to that of conventional pressure-pack acrylic resin. J Prosthodont. 2004 Jun;13(2):83-9. — View Citation

Pires FR, Santos EB, Bonan PR, De Almeida OP, Lopes MA. Denture stomatitis and salivary Candida in Brazilian edentulous patients. J Oral Rehabil. 2002 Nov;29(11):1115-9. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Microbial Growth	cfu/ml	3 weeks