View clinical trials related to Metastatic Breast Cancer.
Filter by:The goal of this phase II clinical trial] is to analyze the efficacy of patritumab deruxtecan (HER3-DXd) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) or advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) with active brain metastases (BM) who have received at least one line of systemic therapy in the advanced setting, or patients with active leptomeningeal carcinomatosis/disease (LMD) after radiotherapy from an advanced solid tumor who do not need immediate local treatment, and have not received prior treatment with an anti-HER3 targeted drug]. The main questions it aims to answer are: - The intracranial objective response rate (ORR-IC) per local investigator as judged by best central nervous system (CNS) response according to Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases (RANO-BM) criteria of HER3-DXd in patients with active BM from MBC (Cohort 1) and aNSCLC (Cohort 2). - The overall survival (OS) rate at 3 months of HER3-DXd in patients with advanced solid tumors with untreated LMD (Cohort 3). Participants will receive HER3-DXd on day (D1) of each 21-day cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death, or discontinuation from the study treatment for any other reason. Researchers will compare historical groups to see if HER3-DXd positively impacts patient outcomes.
This is a randomized Phase II study of carboplatin monotherapy vs. carboplatin combined with tocilizumab in in Black and non-Black patients with metastatic triple negative or ER low breast cancer.
GIM22-ERICA is a clinical trial investigating the efficacy of two different strategies in HER2 negative MBC treatment. The study will include MBC patients with histologically documented HER2 negative disease, who have progressed to one prior regimen for metastatic disease and are eligible for a second-line chemotherapy with either eribulin or capecitabine. This study design should answer to different questions: - What is the correct placement of Eribulin in the context of a long term treatment strategy? - Is an early use of Eribulin the best approach for MBC pts treatment? - May early use of Eribulin impact on subsequent treatment outcomes? The correlated biomarkers analysis, evaluating angiogenic, epithelial and mesenchymal markers should confirm the results observed in preclinical studies ad support the clinical findings. Liquid biopsies and ctDNA evaluation could help to monitor the course of the disease and to identify novel biomarkers of drug resistance.
The majority of patients (pts) with breast cancer have hormone receptor positive (HR+) disease, and this holds true for pts with advanced breast cancer (ABC). Currently frontline therapy for pts with HR+ ABC is antihormonal therapy with an aromatase inhibitor or selective estrogen receptor degrader plus a CDK4/6i. The proposed trial is a randomized study to further evaluate the potential benefit of switching a frontline regimen at the time that a molecular signal, ctDNA, suggests progression prior to detection of clinical progression using standard methods. The purpose of this study is to determine whether switching treatment earlier in the disease process, based on molecular progression, will increase the amount of time that a patient's metastatic breast cancer is controlled compared to patients with metastatic breast cancer who receive treatment later based on diagnostic imaging results or other methods currently used in medical practice.
Aromatase inhibitor (AI) + CDK4/6 inhibitor is settled down as the standard first line therapy for HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer and all three CDk4/6 inhibitors, palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib are currently available for same indications. However, there is no effective treatment strategy for patients who have progressed on AI+CDK4/6 inhibitor. In particular, the clinical efficacies of subsequent hormone therapy are lowered when ESR1 mutations, one of mechanisms of AI resistance occur. In the PADA-1 trial, when ESR1 mutations in ctDNA were detected in patients treated with AI+CDK4/6 inhibitor, AI was switched to fulvestrant even if disease progression was not confirmed clinically. As a result, the median PFS was prolonged by about 8 months in this switching group compared to the group in which AI was continued. The results of this study suggested that delaying the occurrence of ESR1 mutations and early response to them are necessary to increase the effectiveness of hormone therapy. In SWOG S0226 study, fulvestrant + AI combination showed significant benefits in PFS and OS compared to AI monotherapy as the first line therapy. Based on these results, the NCCN guideline suggests fulvestrant + AI combination as one of the first line hormone therapy options. However, the clinical effect of AI + fulvestrant + CDK4/6 inhibitor has not been investigated yet. Therefore, the investigators are planning to compare the clinical efficacy of AI+ fulvestrant + CDK4/6 inhibitor and AI+CDK4/6 inhibitor, and to investigate if a triple combination regimen can delay the emergence of ESR1 mutations and modulate occurred ESR1 mutations.
The multicenter, two-cohort, non-comparative, open-label, phase II clinical trial SABINA aims to analyze the safety and efficacy of MEN1611 in monotherapy and in combination with eribulin, a non-taxane chemotherapy agent, in Hormone Receptor (HR)-known/Human Epidermial Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA)/ Phosphatase and Tensin Homolog (PTEN)-altered, unresectable locally advanced or metastatic metaplastic breast carcinoma (MpBC) patients. A run-in phase for safety and tolerability of MEN1611 in combination with standard doses of eribulin will be conducted as an initial step of the cohort A. This first step aims at evaluating the dosing schedule of MEN1611, by analyzing the toxicity profile of the combined regimen. With the background of the first-in-human study (PA-001EU), the safe dose of MEN1611 has been established as 48 mg orally BID (two intakes of 3 capsules of 16 mg each, for a total daily dose of 96 mg MEN1611 free-base).
The goal of this observational study is to assess the effectiveness of the mDETECT breast cancer blood test at monitoring treatment response in women with metastatic breast cancer undergoing treatment.
The aim of the study is to find out whether supervised physical exercise during cancer drug treatment improves the effectiveness of the treatment in metastasized breast, kidney, ovarian and prostate cancer compared to unsupervised exercise. In addition, the investigators are investigating whether the use of atorvastatin combined with guided group exercise training would further improve the response to cancer treatment.
This study aimed to evaluate the use of SHR-A1811 in HER2-expression Advanced Breast Cancer patients with brain metastases.
Trastuzumab for injection is a biosimilar of Herceptin ® produced by Chia Tai Tianqing Biotechnology Co., LTD, which is a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody produced by chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. A randomized, double-blind, single-dose, parallel phase I study comparing trastuzumab for injection with Herceptin ® in healthy male volunteers was conducted to evaluate the similarities in pharmacokinetics, tolerability, safety and immunogenicity of Trastuzumab for injection and Herceptin®.