View clinical trials related to Metastatic Breast Cancer.
Filter by:This is an open-label, single arm, multicenter phase II study evaluating treatment with pembrolizumab in combination with paclitaxel in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-luminal Hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative (hereafter referred to as HR+/HER2-) breast cancer who had recurrence or progression while receiving previous therapy with a CDK inhibitor in the adjuvant setting or to treat advanced disease (or both).
• To capture the treatment patterns and clinical characteristics of patients with ER/PR positive, HER2-negative MBC in Greece
This is a randomized, multicenter phase 2 clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of capecitabine plus pyrotinib versus capecitabine plus trastuzumab plus pertuzumab in patients who have HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer and have not received systemic anticancer therapy for advanced disease.
The investigator propose a prospective study using blood samples (liquid biopsy) of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients to understand the prevalence of estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) mutation variants and the correlation with hormonal therapy (HT)-based treatment resistance in Asian ER-positive/human epidermal growth receptor-2 (HER2)-negative MBC population.
The reason for this study is to see if the study drug LY3484356 alone or in combination with other anticancer therapies is safe and effective in participants with advanced or metastatic breast cancer or endometrial cancer.
A retrospective observational analysis of de-identified Flatiron Health Analytic Database to describe patient characteristics, treatment patterns and effectiveness of Palbociclib + AI as first-line therapy in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in the US clinical practices.
The primary objective is to assess the safety of a single dose of GB221 compared to Herceptin® when administered as a single IV injection at a dose of 8 mg/kg. The secondary objective of the study is to assess the pharmacokinetics of GB221 compared to Herceptin®.
The LIBERATE intervention is a multi-component self-management, symptom monitoring and signposting website tailored to the supportive needs of women living with secondary breast cancer. Overall, this intervention aims to improve quality of life among this growing group of patients through targeted, tailored and accessible information and support. This randomised waiting list control trial aims to evaluate the feasibility of the clinically integrated LIBERATE intervention. Results of participants' online symptom monitoring questionnaires are integrated with their electronic patient record, enabling clinician review and follow up alongside participants' own self-management activities.
Osteolytic bone metastases and myeloma bone lesions are responsible of long bone and vertebral fractures leading to restricted mobility, surgery and medullar compression that severely alter quality of life and that have a huge medico-economic impact. It has been estimated that 50% of the patients with bone metastasis will encounter bone complications. In the recent years, Bone Oncology Multidisciplinary Meetings have been developed to optimize bone metastases management for each patient in harmony with oncology program. The assessment of the fracture risk of bone metastasis remains fairly empirical and is based on simple radiography. The Mirel's score for long bones is focused on the extent of cortical defect caused by bone metastasis to identify high-risk patients at risk of fracture during surgery. It is old, little used in routine and lacks sensitivity and specificity. The SINS (Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score) score is the reference for vertebrae. Today, most patients with fracture-risk bone metastasis benefit from a lesion-centered CT scan to better characterize its extent and position but the interpretation remains qualitative. Metastases are considered as an air cavity and the mechanical properties of the tumor are not evaluated. However, many other parameters from the CTscan are available such as cortical or trabecular compartment densitometry, cortical thickness, tumor volume, and position of lysis in the bone. Based on experience acquired by the service in the evaluation of bone mechanical strength on benign bones, the investigator aim at integrating in the numerical simulation the mechanical properties of both bone and tumor, in order to evaluate the mechanical strength of the pathological bone using a numerical simulation model (finite element analysis-FEA). MEKANOS will enroll patients with bone metastases of breast, lung, kidney, thyroid or bladder cancer and myeloma lesions affecting the vertebrae or the upper end of the femur. The resistance obtained will be compared to that of an intact bone. The best predictive parameters of mechanical strength (position of lysis, tumor nature, and bone architecture) will be then determined. Finally, the added value of this technique in relation to historical fragility scores (Mirel's and SINS scores) will be assessed. The ultimate goal is to provide tools to assess fracture risk and improve the preventive management of bone metastases in harmony with the referring oncologist
This is an open-label, three-cohort phase 2 study of KN026 in subjects with advanced breast Cancer.