View clinical trials related to Medication Administered in Error.
Filter by:To examine the effect of a Medication Coordinator, who facilitates medication reviews in close collaboration with patients using My Medication Plan to reduce the risk of post-hospital inappropriate medication usage.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether an intervention called Pediatric Medication Therapy Management (pMTM) improves the identification and management of medication-related problems among children with medical complexity and polypharmacy.
Up to a third of patients who visit emergency departments (EDs) do so because they have an issue with medicines prescribed by their doctor or purchased over the counter. For example, some patients might experience side effects (e.g., sickness), whereas others may feel their prescribed medicine is not working and want an alternative. While some patients who visit EDs know they have a problem with their medication, some are not aware. Furthermore, drug-related problems (DRPs) may not be identified by ED triage systems which are used to sort patients' priority for treatment. The currently used system in the UK (Manchester Triage System) mentions drugs infrequently and does not support the identification of the most common DRPs. For this project, DRPs include medication errors, adverse drug events, and adverse drug reactions. This project aims to revise the triage system to support the discovery of patients' medication problems when they are triaged by a nurse upon arrival to the ED. After identification, problems with a patient's medication should be dealt with by the healthcare professional who is most appropriate to manage that particular issue. For example, a patient who has been prescribed a new medicine but already takes 20 medicines will likely benefit from a review by a pharmacist in the ED. This project will aim to support the management of patients who might benefit from care provided by pharmacists by providing them with this care. As well as ensuring medication problems are identified at triage, and that pharmacists are involved in helping to deal with those problems, this project will also try to understand how we can investigate how pharmacists actually make a difference to the care of ED patients. A multi-step approach (Stages A-F) is proposed to answer the question "How can patient DRPs be identified, triaged and managed in the ED?" In summary, the steps include: STAGE A, a systematic review and scoping survey; STAGE B, researcher visits to ED sites to shadow ED staff; STAGE C, Interviews with healthcare professionals (including those shadowed in STAGE B) to validate findings of site visits and explore topics in more depth; STAGE D, developing additional drug-related content for the Manchester Triage System; STAGE E, involving a panel of experts in a RAND appropriateness method to rate the content developed in STAGE D; STAGE F, testing the revised triage system for a future pilot study involving interviews with staff visited in STAGE B.
This pilot project aims to reduce the prescribing of high-risk medications, such as antipsychotics and benzodiazepines, to hospitalized older adults. To accomplish this, this project consists of two phases. The purpose is to determine whether a novel simulation-based training program reduces prescribing of suboptimal medications for older adults. A 2-arm pilot randomized controlled trial will be conducted to test a simulation-based, principle-driven intervention targeting high-risk prescribing practices versus control.
This is a randomized controlled study of parents of children to be discharged from the neonatal intensive care unit at Bellevue and Elmhurst hospitals. A total of 425 subjects will be recruited across two sites over preparatory phases and two primary study phases.
This research project will evaluate a gamified electronic medication administration record (eMAR) system simulator as a mechanism to improve students' learning of medication administration in simulated clinical education. The gamified eMAR simulator will be evaluated using a pragmatic randomized controlled trial design in order to determine the effectiveness of the game as a technology-enabled, online learning intervention.
This study evaluates the the effectiveness of pre-consultation Medication Reconciliation Service in reducing unintentional medication discrepancies among patients who discharged from hospital to primary care.
Serious medication administration errors are common in hospitals and nurse's interruptions during medication preparation and administration is associated with errors. Various interventions were developed to help prevention of errors such as visual intervention. Investigators aimed to study the effect of a medication safety vest to reduce medication errors. The vest serves as a visible signal to inform others that the nurse is preparing and administering medications and should not be disturbed. Patients and visitors are provided with an informational flyer to inform them about the use of medication safety vests. The hypothesis is that the vest will reduce nurse's interruptions during medication preparation and administration, and ultimately reduce medication errors. The study is a randomized controlled trial in 30 care units of four hospitals in France. Each unit will be randomized in either the control group or the experimental group using the medication safety vest. Nurses of the unit will be selected at random to determine who will be observed during the administration rounds.The observation method will be used to evaluate the error rates in the 2 groups. The number of interruptions and error rates will be evaluated.
Adverse events are frequent in Neonatal Intensive Care Units' (NICU) patients and account for a high morbidity and mortality. Possible severe adverse events are central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI), ventilator and catheter associated adverse events and medication errors. Severity of the patient's outcome after an adverse event can be classified using the National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Preventing (NCC MERP) Index for categorizing medication errors. The study will test the hypothesis that rates of adverse events in NICU patients will be reduced by the implementation of an educational program for the NICU caregivers (nurses and physicians), consisting of strategies for recognizing and preventing adverse events in their unit. These strategies will be oriented to prevent CLABSI, medication errors, skin and nasal complications and ventilator and catheter-associated adverse events. This trial has a stepped wedge cluster design, in which the NICUs from 12 hospitals in France will be randomized to the timing of implementation of the educational program. In order to describe the adverse events occurring during the study period, an anonymous voluntary adverse event reporting system will be provided to the caregivers of the participating units. A nested study will examine how caregivers communicate with the patients' parents in case of adverse event (disclosure or not, and caregivers' reasons). The rates of adverse events will be measured retrospectively using a neonatal NICU trigger tool.
To identify the key issues around use of computerized patient infusion devices (called "smart pumps"). To develop strategies that will improve the prevention of intravenous errors that will be broadly applicable. The investigators will conduct a national study using the general methodology developed by Husch et al. to allow a rapid assessment of the frequency and types of medication errors at an institution. The key questions the investigators will address are: 1. What are the frequency and types of intravenous medication errors? 2. How much variability is there by frequency and type among settings? 3. After review of the initial data, what strategies appear to have the greatest potential for reducing intravenous medication error frequency? 4. How effective is an intervention including a bundle of these strategies at multiple sites?