View clinical trials related to Medication Adherence.
Filter by:After the first medical history by the nurse and the emergency physician, the pharmacist and the pharmacy assistant take a detailed history of the patient's medications separately. After checking with the patient's reference pharmacy, the pharmacist and pharmacy assistant compare their results.
This study was a single-blinded, two-armed, randomized controlled trial comparing a medication self-management intervention to usual care for hypertensive elderly in the residential care facility. To explore the effect of stage-matched tailored education on disease management for hypertensive elderly. Patient were randomly assigned to either a 6-month trans-theoretical model-based medication management intervention group or a treatment-as-usual group. we would like to improve its adherence to the medicine prescribed by their own physician through five sessions of face-to-face interview which focused on anti-hypertensive medication-related information, the importance of medication refills, motivation, self-management and self-check skills.
This observational study aims to learn about the psychosocial risk factors of osteoporosis (OP) patients. The main question it aims to answer is: - Which biopsychosocial factors affect OP patients' fragility fracture risk regarding the health behaviour model? Participants will fulfil these forms below here; - Sociodemographic and Clinical Information Form, - Fragility Fracture Information Form - Medication Adherence Report Scale - Brief Illness Perception Scale - The Beliefs About the Medicines Scale-Specific - The Short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction - Perceived Stress Scale - Multidimensional Perceived Social Support Scale - Brief Symptom Inventory - Depression and Anxiety - Health Behavior Assessment Scale
The goal of this clinical trial is to test whether financial support in the form of a one-time $500 stipend would improve medication adherence and quality of life in low-income, socially-needy patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in the post-discharge setting. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Will financial support improve heart failure quality of life? - Will financial support improve medication adherence? Participants will complete surveys on quality of life, social stress, and spending habits at their baseline visit. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive $500 at their baseline visit or $0 at their baseline visit. At their one month visit, quality of life and medication adherence will be assessed. These results will be compared between groups. The group that received $0 at their baseline visit will be provided $500 at their one-month visit and return for a two-month visit. At that visit, quality of life and medication adherence will be assessed. These results will be compared to their one-month results. Researchers will compare the 1-month quality of life scores and medication adherence scores between the immediate financial support vs delayed financial support. Researchers will also compare 1-month vs 2-month quality of life and adherence data for participants who were randomized to the delayed financial support group.
This is an experimental study which aims to explore the effectiveness of a smartphone app for medication adherence (MedAdhere app) among schizophrenic patients for eight weeks.
This clinical trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the theory-based integrated program in promoting medication adherence in patients with schizophrenia. The purpose of this study are: - To explore the effectiveness of the theory-based integrated program in promoting community-based schizophrenia patients' adherence to medication(like :motivation, attitude and behavior) - To explore the effectiveness of the theory-based integrated program in improving the psychiatric symptoms of patients with schizophrenia in the community. Participants (the experimental group) received routine home visits from psychiatric mental nurses, including drug administration, drug side effects and symptom management, life care, and the theory-based program provided by the researcher(treatment as usual + the theory-based integrated program). The comparison group: received routine home visits from psychiatric mental nurses, including drug administration, drug side effects, and symptom management, life care,(treatment as usual).
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is one of the top ten public health threats facing humanity. The misuse and overuse of antibiotics has been identified as a major factor in the development of drug-resistant pathogens, and 30% of all antimicrobials administered in Western acute hospitals are unnecessary or inappropriate. As a consequence, the establishment of antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASPs) has increased in hospitals over the past decades. Using ASPs to optimise antimicrobial use is critical to effectively fight infections, protect patients and reduce AMR. ASPs can increase infection cure rates while reducing AMR, but it has been reported that few of them are specifically targeted at surgical specialties or led by surgeons. Surgeons are actively involved in antibiotic prescribing and should therefore play an important role in the development and leadership of ASPs in surgical departments. Practice Guidelines have established recommendations for the wise use of antibiotics in patients affected by intra-abdominal infection: early identification of sepsis, early initiation of antimicrobial therapy and early control of the infectious focus. The literature on the optimal duration of antibiotic treatment in surgery is sparse, but it seems that, if the septic source has been effectively controlled, short courses of treatment show the same results as longer courses.Compliance rates with the suggested duration of treatment in evidence-based guidelines are low among the surgical community. No specially designed ASPs for the reduction of treatment duration in surgery have been reported. ASPs may be easy to introduce in a single hospital, but the feasibility of a nationwide implementation of ASPs in a large and diverse hospital population is unclear. This prospective, interventional, cohort study was aimed: to reduce the duration of antimicrobial treatment in surgical departments by modifying their prescriptions through educational and consensual interventions; and to assess the feasibility of implementing a multi-centre ASP, leveraging a nationwide surveillance programme for healthcare-associated infection. It was hypothesised that a coordinated and guided implementation strategy, organised within a consolidated infection surveillance network, would lead to the successful implementation of the ASP and reduce antibiotic consumption in participating hospitals.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if nurse-pharmacist counseling can improve patient knowledge and confidence and prevent side effects in patients who start a biologic medication in-office and later continue the medication at home. The main question it aims to answer are: • Does nurse-pharmacist counseling improve patient-reported knowledge and confidence in biologic self-treatment when moving from in-office to at-home administration? Participants will attend a brief counseling session in office and respond to a pre-counseling and post-counseling survey to look at medication knowledge and confidence. Participants will be contacted at three months after the survey to ask if they had any side effects related to their biologic medicine. Data will be collected from the participant's medical record at the study institution for up to six months after the study counseling session.
This study is being conducted to adapt and pilot test a technology-enabled, primary care strategy for routinely monitoring medication use and adherence among older adults with multiple chronic conditions and polypharmacy.
In this study, the investigators will test the mobile game, Viral Combat, for efficacy and acceptability among diverse participants, ages 15-34 years, receiving PrEP care in clinical settings in New England and Mississippi. Formative evaluation interviews will be conducted with stakeholders (healthcare workers, clinic administrators, and patients taking PrEP) to inform intervention delivery. Data from the formative interviews will also be used to make necessary adaptations to the game and assess acceptability for diverse populations and clinics. Viral Combat will then be further tested with 200 participants ages 15-34 years, receiving PrEP care at clinical sites in the South (n=100 Jackson, MS) and New England (n=100, Providence, RI; Boston, MA) in a multisite Hybrid Type 1 effectiveness-implementation randomized controlled trial (RCT). This trial will test the efficacy of the intervention compared to a control condition (a non-PrEP related game) on biological and behavioral measures. At the end of the trial, a summative evaluation of the implementation context using the i-PARIHS framework will occur. These interviews with study participants and clinic staff will inform future implementation and dissemination of Viral Combat.