Clinical Trials Logo

Manual Dexterity clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Manual Dexterity.

Filter by:
  • None
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT06388928 Completed - Menstrual Cycle Clinical Trials

Effect of Menstrual Cycle on the Manual Dexterity of Female Dentists

Start date: July 9, 2023
Phase:
Study type: Observational

The aim of this observational study was to investigate the effect of the menstrual cycle on the manual dexterity of female dentists. This study was conducted to answer the following question: - Is there any effect of the menstrual cycle on the manual dexterity of female dentists?

NCT ID: NCT06344221 Not yet recruiting - Stroke Clinical Trials

Post-stroke Haptic Feedback Use Deficit: A Comparative and Reliability Study

HapticS
Start date: April 15, 2024
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The aim of this comparative and reliability study is to highlight a deficit in the use of vibrotactile sensory feedback (haptic effect) in the planning and execution of fine manual dexterity movements after stroke. The investigators will include 3 groups of subjects, 1 group of young healthy subjects, 1 of older subjects matched in age and sex to the group of chronic stroke patients. Participants will take part in clinical tests of fine motor skills and sensitivity and will use a device to assess the key components of manual dexterity, to which vibrotactile sensors will be added. If they so wish, participants will be able to take part in a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) study to assess the facilitation of cortical excitability due to the haptic effect.

NCT ID: NCT05260190 Recruiting - Stroke Clinical Trials

Manual Dexterity Modifications After Application of tSMS Over the Primary Motor Cortex (M1)

Start date: September 1, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Transcranial static magnetic field stimulation (tSMS) is a novel brain stimulation technique that has been shown to be safe and effective in modifying biological parameters when applied to the cerebral cortex. Its application decreases cortical excitability, regardless of the polarity of the magnetic field, reducing the amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEP). tSMS is presented as a potentially useful tool in the management of the interhemispheric inhibition, a condition present in neurological pathologies such as stroke or multiple sclerosis. Despite having demonstrated neurophysiological effects in previous studies, the effects of tSMS application on force production and manual dexterity, have not yet been clearly established. The present study aims to evaluate changes in force production, manual dexterity, and fatigue after unilateral application of a tSMS session on the primary motor cortex (M1). It is hypothesized that the application of tSMS will momentarily decrease the parameters of strength and manual dexterity in the upper limb contralateral to the stimulated cortex, without changes in the strength and dexterity of the unstimulated hemibody. These parameters may show an increase in the unstimulated hemibody. If the hypothesis is confirmed, it could be considered a valid treatment for health conditions presenting interhemispheric inhibition.

NCT ID: NCT04359082 Recruiting - Gut Microbiome Clinical Trials

Cocoa-rich Bioflavanol Supplementation Effects During Cold Exposure

Start date: January 13, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The primary purpose is to test whether cocoa-rich bioflavanols can improve blood flow to the hand and fingers and improve hand function/dexterity during cold exposure. Secondary purpose is to understand whether bioflavanol supplementation can change the gut microbiome.

NCT ID: NCT03372031 Completed - Aging Clinical Trials

The Effectiveness of Piano Therapy vs. Piano Listening on Manual Dexterity in the Elderly

Start date: August 30, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Does active piano practice help recover hand dexterity in older adults, or does social interaction and music-listening alone affect motor performance? Researchers hypothesized improved dexterity after active piano playing, but not after passive piano listening. 15 residents of a retirement community were partnered together and completed 2 two-week piano training modules. In module 1, one partner played piano exercises and songs while the other listened. In module 2, partners switched roles. The Purdue Pegboard Test and Box and Block Test assessed fine and gross motor dexterity, before, between, and after the training modules. A repeated measures ANOVA showed a main effect of time on overall fine and gross motor function, but there was no main effect of playing versus listening. Results did not support the hypothesis, but indicate that piano-based therapy requires greater than 2 weeks to begin improving dexterity and may influenced co-occurring socialization.

NCT ID: NCT02146443 Completed - Manual Dexterity Clinical Trials

Validation and Test-retest Study of the Star-shaped Manual Dexterity Test.

Start date: June 2014
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to measure test-retest reliability and validate the star shaped test of manual dexterity. The purpose of this is to see if there is any significant learning effect, and if the test can discriminate between individuals who are at their normal skill level, and when they are stressed and/or fatigued. The test is designed to test hand to eye coordination and precision control. This is done by following a star shaped track with a pair of a surgical scissors. this is done 10 times, 5 times clockwise and 5 times counter clockwise. Each time the scissors come into contact with the border of the track, an error is counted. Overall completion time is recorded. As a randomized crossover study, we will have 20 test subjects complete the test 4 times. Each test will be conducted with a pause of two breaks between the tests. Before each test, the test subjects are randomized to: no intervention, physical fatigue prior to testing, distractions during the test or both physical fatigue prior to testing and distractions during the test. All participants will complete a test with all four interventions. Furthermore, a test-retest trial will be conducted on 4 test-subjects. Each subject will complete the test two times with no interventions, with two days apart.