View clinical trials related to Malabsorption Syndromes.
Filter by:Bile acid diarrhoea is a chronic disease that impairs quality of life. One in 100 has the condition and many suffer from the disease without knowing. The current test is called SeHCAT and is expensive and time-consuming and is unavailable in many places, including the US. The disease is often misdiagnosed as irritable bowel syndrome and estimated one third of patients with irritable bowel syndrome of the mixed type and the diarrhoea predominant type suffer from bile acid diarrhoea without knowing. A blood test called 7α-hydroxy-4-cholestene-3-one (C4) could make it much easier to diagnose bile acid diarrhoea. To establish the new test, the results of both C4 and SeHCAT are compared with the treatment effect of the drug called colesevelam. We invite patients who are referred for the SeHCAT test to participate in the trial. The SeHCAT test takes two days that are one week apart. The study patients register stool habits with a diary in the week between the SeHCAT visits. Based on the diary results, we screen for eligibility; e.g. a certain degree/severity of diarrhoea is required for participation. We treat eligible study patients (i.e those with diarrhoea) with either colesevelam or placebo (medicine without effect) that is randomly assigned. 170 study patients need to complete the treatment. We aim to validate (ie. compare) both the C4-test and the SeHCAT test with the colesevelam treatment response as the reference.
This study evaluates the effect of different methods of preparation (cooked and consumed hot vs cooked, cooled overnight and consumed cold) and variation in the activity of salivary amylase on the glycemic index and carbohydrate digestibility in healthy human subjects. The effect of genetic variation in small intestinal starch digesting enzymes on glycemic index and starch digestibility will also be assessed.
Obesity is an independent risk factor for colorectal cancer (CRC) although the underlying mechanisms have not been elucidated. Dietary nutrients play a key role in both the prevention and promotion of CRC. While iron is an essential nutrient, excess iron is associated with carcinogenesis. Unlike the systemic compartment, the intestinal lumen lacks an efficient system to regulate iron. In conditions when dietary iron malabsorption and intestinal inflammation co-exist, greater luminal iron is associated with increased intestinal inflammation and a shift in the gut microbiota to more pro-inflammatory strains. However, treatments designed to reduce luminal, including diet restriction and chelation, are associated with lower intestinal inflammation and the colonization of protective gut microbes. Obesity is associated with inflammation-induced, hepcidin-mediated, iron metabolism dysfunction characterized by iron deficiency and dietary iron malabsorption. Obesity is also linked to intestinal inflammation. Currently, there is a fundamental gap in understanding how altered iron metabolism impacts CRC risk in obesity. The investigator's objective is to conduct a crossover controlled feeding trial of: 1) a "Typical American" diet with "high" heme/non-heme iron", 2) a "Typical American" diet with "low" iron, and 3) a Mediterranean diet with "high" non heme iron and examine effects on colonic and systemic inflammation and the gut microbiome.
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study in non-homozygous human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DQ.2.5+ adults with celiac disease (CeD).
This is a large and comprehensively phenotyped cohort with fasting glycaemia where the predictive value of body composition and anthropometric measures of total and central fat distribution for postprandial carbohydrate intolerance are studied.
This study will evaluate the possibility of a differential effect of eluxadoline on altered bowel function in Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Diarrhea (IBS-D) participants with and without evidence of Bile Acid Malabsorption (BAM).
Iron deficiency is the most common cause of anemia in pregnancy worldwide, and, when severe, can have serious consequences for mothers and babies. While treatment of iron-deficiency anemia with iron supplementation is recommended, treatment strategies remain controversial: the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology recommends oral iron supplementation with parental iron reserved for the rare patient who cannot tolerate or will not take oral iron, while UK professional organizations recommend a more liberal use of parenteral iron. The reason for these disparate recommendations is that few high-quality studies comparing oral to parenteral iron have been conducted in developed countries, and the potential impact of parental iron treatment on obstetric and perinatal outcomes remains unclear. We propose the first randomized-controlled trial in the United States describing the effectiveness and safety of treating pregnant women with iron-deficiency anemia with a protocol including parenteral iron compared with a protocol based on oral iron.
Bariatric surgery represents the best therapeutic option to induce sustainable weight loss and to solve serious comorbidities improving the life-expectancy and the quality of life. Actually the choice of the procedure is based on the surgeon's and patients preference . Mini gastric bypass(MGB) is an emerging procedure offering excellent results in terms of weight loss and comorbidities (mainly metabolic) control. On the other hand, recent data indicated that the gut microbiota may mediate some of the beneficial effects of bariatric surgery and changes in the composition and diversity of the gut microbiota have been observed after RY Gastric Bypass (RYGB) in humans as well as in mice. However, there are no prospective investigations on Gut Microbiota changes after MGB, despite the procedure is described as "malabsorptive" and there are no studies comparing gut microbiota shift and malabsorption entity in humans after RYGB vs MGB. Thereafter prospective data on the incidence of bile reflux esophageal lesions after MGB are lacking. The aim of the present multicentric prospective comparative study is to evaluate malabsorption and gut microbiota shift after laparoscopic RYGB vs MGB at 1 year.
To evaluate the pharmacokinetic parameters of orally administered 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 [25(OH)D3] and vitamin D3 from the corresponding serum concentration-time curves in healthy adults and adults with a history of intestinal malabsorption.
To compare with a randomized trial (n=15 per treatment group), effects of colesevelam and placebo treatment, on colonic transit, bowel functions, permeability and tight junction expression in rectosigmoid mucosa of IBS-D with Bile Acid Malabsorption.