View clinical trials related to Macrosomia, Fetal.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to compare the incidence of composite neonatal morbidity and birthweight >4500 grams among uncomplicated large for gestational age (LGA) fetal growth at delivered 37 weeks versus expectant management.
Background Macrosomia at birth is associated with subsequent susceptibility to obesity, abnormal glucose metabolism, hypertension and dyslipidaemia. Epigenetic reprogramming has been reported to be involved in the development of human diseases caused by suboptimal environmental or nutritional factors. Objective The study was aiming to explore epigenetic mechanism influences on macrosomic infants exposed to intrauterine hyperglycemia. Design The investigators performed a genome-wide analysis of DNA methylation in cord blood from macrosomic infants born to women with gestational diabetes or infants with normal birth weight born to normal glucose-tolerant women in order to identify genes related to foetal growth or early adipose tissue development. The candidate genes were then validated using SEQUENOM MassARRAY after bisulfite conversion.
Studies evaluating lifestyle intervention in obese women during pregnancy have reported limited success in decreasing excessive gestational weight gain, and have failed to achieve the key outcome of breaking the obesity cycle and reducing neonatal adiposity or birth weight. Although some investigators advocate weight loss during pregnancy in obese women, these recommendations were based on extrapolation of retrospective epidemiological data. Of concern, we reported increased small for gestational age babies and decreased lean body mass in neonates of obese women with weight loss or inadequate gestational weight gain. Based on our research, optimal outcomes from lifestyle interventions are likely to be temporal and therefore must be initiated prior to conception to first improve maternal metabolic function, and subsequently, placental/fetal growth. Several large retrospective cohort studies support our hypothesis. For example, women who lost weight between pregnancies had fewer large for gestational age babies in contrast to women who increased interpregnancy weight. In addition, prospective randomized controlled trials have shown that postpartum weight loss is achievable without adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes, these studies include women who breastfed. Based on these observations, we propose a randomized control trial to determine the effect of lifestyle intervention initiated prior to a planned pregnancy on improving neonatal metabolism and adiposity. Our overarching hypothesis is that the maternal pre-pregnancy metabolic condition determines the obesogenic in-utero environment, which affects programming of placental mitochondrial function and metabolic pathways, promoting lipid accumulation and neonatal adiposity. Our rationale is based on the need to establish the most effective time to introduce an intervention that will break the obesity cycle in mothers and their children. Understanding how pregravid metabolic conditioning improves maternal physiology, and cellular and molecular function in pregnancy will provide the empirical data to support the intervention. We have a highly successful record of recruiting women who are planning a pregnancy, obtaining compliance in longitudinal studies, and in long-term follow-up of mothers and their offspring. Lifestyle intervention will be initiated prior to conception to decrease maternal body fat, inflammation, insulin resistance, and ?-cell dysfunction. Our transdisciplinary team has the required expertise in lifestyle interventions management of obesity, and in human physiology that is needed to determine the effects of these interventions on maternal metabolism and fetalplacental growth and function. We will recruit 200 women to pursue the following specific aims: Specific Aim 1: To investigate the physiological significance of lifestyle intervention in preparation for pregnancy (LIPP) on maternal and neonatal metabolism and adiposity. Specific Aim 2: To determine the molecular effects whereby lifestyle intervention initiated before pregnancy can improve placental mitochondrial lipid oxidation and accumulation.
Fetal growth abnormalities is one of the most common problems faced in modern obstetrics. The association between low birth weight and perinatal death as well as severe morbidity is well known. Since fetal weight cannot be measured directly, obstetricians use estimates of fetal weight obtained by utilizing various ultrasonographic measurements to diagnose growth abnormalities. Currently in clinical practice, the majority of fetal ultrasound centers employ population-based fetal growth curves that have been previously published and updated to estimate fetal weight percentiles. Up to 70% of neonates found to be below the 10% percentile for estimated fetal weight in population-based growth curves are actually constitutionally small; that is a neonate deemed "small" based on standardized growth curves but in reality have reached its appropriate growth potential in relation to its genetic predisposition. An equally difficult clinical scenario is fetal macrosomia. A recent meta-analysis revealed that the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound detection of fetal macrosomia ranges from 15-79%. When compared with neonates with normal birth weight, the odds ratio of emergency cesarean delivery and shoulder dystocia are increased significantly. Various ultrasound parameters have been tested in an effort to detect both fetal compromise prior to the development of permanent damage and allow differentiation between true fetal growth abnormalities and normal growth potential. Recent reports have introduced the concept of customized fetal growth curve which uses physiological variables to report an adjusted fetal growth assessment. To date, the use of customized fetal growth curves has not been evaluated prospectively. Furthermore, this strategy has not been compared to standard population-based fetal growth curves currently used in clinical practice to determine which would be the most ideal for use in clinical practice. The primary research question is: are customized fetal growth curves more accurate than population-based fetal growth curves at predicting abnormalities in fetal growth, defined as small-for-gestational age or large-for-gestational age at birth in newborns of high-risk pregnancies? Randomly, participants will be assigned to either having fetal growth reported by customized or population bases growth curves.