View clinical trials related to Lymphoma, B-cell.
Filter by:This research is being done to assess the effectiveness and safety of acalabrutinib combined with lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) for people with relapsed/refractory aggressive B-cell lymphoma. This research study involves the study drug acalabrutinib in combination with lisocabtagene maraleuce
B-cell Lymphoma is an aggressive and rare cancer of a type of immune cells (a white blood cell responsible for fighting infections). The purpose of this study is to assess the change in disease activity of epcoritamab when combined with intravenous and oral rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin hydrochloride, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) or R-CHOP in adult participants globally with diffuse large b-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Change in disease activity will be assessed. Epcoritamab is an investigational drug being developed for the treatment of DLBCL. Study doctors put the participants in groups called treatment arms. Participants will receive epcoritamab combined with R-CHOP, followed by epcoritamab or R-CHOP followed by rituximab will be explored. Approximately 900 adult participants with with newly diagnosed DLBCL will be enrolled in the study in approximately 315 sites in globally. In the Arm 1, participants will receive subcutaneous epcoritamab combined with intravenous and oral R-CHOP followed by subcutaneous epcoritamab in 21-day cycles. In the Arm 2, participants will receive intravenous and oral R-CHOP followed by intravenous rituximab in 21-day cycles. There may be higher treatment burden for participants in this trial compared to their standard of care. Participants will attend regular visits during the study at an approved institution (hospital or clinic). The effect of the treatment will be frequently checked by medical assessments, blood tests, questionnaires and side effects.
This is a prospective, single-arm, multi-center, phase Ib/II clinical trial to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of selinexor in combination with R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and prednisone) followed by selinexor maintenance for untreated EBV-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients.
This is a Phase 1/2a open-label, multicenter, dose escalation and dose expansion trial in which IMT-009 will be administered by the intravenous (IV) route to participants with solid tumors or lymphomas. The main goals of this study are to: - Find the recommended dose of IMT-009 that can be safely given to participants - Learn more about the side effects of IMT-009 - Learn more about pharmacokinetics of IMT-009 - Learn more about the effectiveness of IMT-009 - Learn more about different pharmacokinetic biomarkers and how they might change in the presence of IMT-009
Purinostat mesylate for injection (PM) was the novel and highly potent Class I a and IIb HDAC-selective inhibitors. The results of regular blood sampling analysis of the mouse B-cell lymphoma model induced by ighmyc transgenic mice showed that the treatment of PM in each group reduced the proportion of peripheral blood tumor cells in mice. Therefore, PM has the potential to treat diffuse large B cell lymphoma. The results of in vitro enzymatic activity screening showed that PM has high inhibitory activity on HDAC tumors (including HDAC1, 2, 3, 8 subtypes) and type II HDACs (including HDAC6, 10 isoforms), which are closely related to tumors in the HDAC family. Therefore, the results of in vitro enzyme activity screening showed that the IC50 values of PM for inhibiting HDAC1, HDAC2, HDAC3, HDAC8, HDAC6, and HDAC10 subtypes of HDAC class I and HDAC class IIb were 0.81, 1.4, 1.7, 3.8, 11.5, and 11 nM, respectively. However, the inhibitory activity of HDAC IIa and HDAC IV enzymes was low, and its IC50 values for HDAC4, HDAC5, HDAC7, HDAC9, and HDAC11 subtypes of HDAC IIa and HDAC IV were 1072, 426, 590, 622, and 3349 nM, respectively. These data means PM exist high selectivity for tumor-associated HDAC class I and HDAC IIb. Compared with the blank control group, the body weight of the tumor-bearing animals in each dose of PM group did not decrease seriously during the treatment process, and the animals were in good condition during the whole experiment, indicating that the PM is efficacy and safe. Main purpose: To further explore the safe and effective dose of priinostat mesylate for injection in the treatment of relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. To evaluate the objective response rate (ORR) of priinostat mesylate for injection in the treatment of relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Secondary purpose: To explore the biomarkers related to the efficacy of priinostat mesylate for injection. To evaluate the time to tumor response (TTR), duration of response (DOR), disease control rate (DCR), and progression-free survival (PFS) in the treatment of relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with prilinostat mesylate for injection ), overall survival (OS). Assessing the safety and tolerability of priinostat mesylate for injection in the treatment of relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
This study evaluates the effectiveness of a supervised progressive resistance training program in patients malignant lymphomas with the primary outcome being lean body mass. The study is designed as a a single center, two-armed, parallel-group, investigator-initiated clinical randomized controlled superiority trail evaluating the effectiveness of a 4-month supervised progressive resistance training intervention compared to usual care.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate safety and tolerability and to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or maximum administered dose (MAD) and/or recommended dose (RD) of SGR-1505.
This will be a multicenter, national, non-interventional, prospective cohort study
The purpose of this study is to find out whether it is practical to use a newer way to calculate melphalan dose given (called population PK model) in BEAM chemotherapy before AHCT. Standard dose is fixed for everybody and is calculated using height and weight. The population PK model, tested in this study, uses information based on people who have previously received melphalan and aims to calculate an optimal dose separately for each person. Study researchers think that the dose calculated using the population PK model may still be effective but have less side effects than the standard melphalan dose.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of glofitamab, as monotherapy and in combination with a standard chemoimmunotherapy regimen: rituximab, ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (R-ICE) in pediatric and young adult participants with relapsed and refractory (R/R) mature B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL).