Clinical Trials Logo

Lung Neoplasms clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Lung Neoplasms.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT04287712 Completed - Clinical trials for Early-Stage Lung Cancer

Detection of Lung Cancer by Plasma Lipids

ELAID
Start date: December 13, 2018
Phase:
Study type: Observational

There are no reliable blood-based tests currently available for early-stage lung cancer diagnosis. We try to establish a highly accurate method for detecting early-stage lung cancer by combining machine learning with untargeted and targeted metabolomics .

NCT ID: NCT04285866 Completed - Clinical trials for Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC)

Spanish Real World Data on Patients Treated With Durvalumab After Chemoradiotherapy.

S-REAL
Start date: May 21, 2020
Phase:
Study type: Observational

This is a non-interventional, observational, multicentre, one-arm, non-comparative, and retrospective study. The study is based on the collection of data about the patients treated with Durvalumab after chemoraditherapy in the real world. The patients participating in this non-interventional study will not receive treatment in relation to the study. The primary objective is to assess affectiveness of durvalumab in patients treated in real-life settings by evaluating Progression Free Survival.

NCT ID: NCT04281784 Completed - Dementia Clinical Trials

Project to Improve Communication About Serious Illness--Hospital Study: Pragmatic Trial (Trial 1)

PICSI-H
Start date: April 23, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The objective of this protocol is to test the effectiveness of a Jumpstart intervention on patient-centered outcomes for patients with chronic illness by ensuring that they receive care that is concordant with their goals over time, and across settings and providers. This study will examine the effect of the EHR-based intervention to improve quality of palliative care for patients 55 years or older with chronic, life-limiting illness with a particular emphasis on Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD). The specific aims are: 1. To evaluate the effectiveness of a novel EHR-based (electronic health record) clinician Jumpstart guide, compared with usual care, for improving the quality of care; the primary outcome is documentation of a goals-of-care discussion in the period between randomization and 30 days following randomization. Secondary outcomes focus on intensity of care: ICU use, ICU and hospital length of stay, costs of care during the hospitalization, and 7 and 30-day hospital readmissions. 2. To conduct a mixed-methods evaluation of the implementation of the intervention, guided by the RE-AIM framework for implementation science, incorporating quantitative evaluation of the intervention's reach and adoption, as well as qualitative analyses of interviews with participants, to explore barriers and facilitators to future implementation and dissemination.

NCT ID: NCT04271384 Completed - Clinical trials for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage I

Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy With Nivolumab for Early-Stage Operable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Start date: February 12, 2020
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

Stage 1 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) carries up to 30% chance of relapse in 5 years. This a phase 2 study that aims to determine the pathological complete response of the combination of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) plus nivolumab as neoadjuvant treatment in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. The patients will receive standard SABR + nivolumab at a dose of 360 mg every 21 days for 3 doses. The patient will undergo surgery 10 weeks after the last radiotherapy dose.

NCT ID: NCT04266691 Completed - Clinical trials for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Analysis of Driver Gene Mutation in Early Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Start date: January 2009
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Analysis of driver gene variation in early stage non-small cell lung cancer

NCT ID: NCT04264325 Completed - Lung Neoplasms Clinical Trials

Quantitative Diaphragmatic Ultrasound Evaluation in Pleural Effusions : A Feasability Study

ADD-Echo
Start date: January 31, 2020
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Malignant pleural effusions cause breathlessness and impairs quality of life. Thoracocentesis is frequently used to relieve breathlessness. The severity of breathlessness correlates poorly with the size of the effusion. Symptom reduction from fluid drainage varies between patients. No predictors exist to identify which patients benefits more of pleural effusion. One study suggests that a inverted hemidiaphramatic (inverted shape) is associated with a greater dyspnea improvement. Others parameters of diaphragmatic motion have not been studied till now. This study aims to evaluate the feasability of diaphragmatic ultrasound evaluation (shape by B-mode, quiet, deep inspiratory motion and sniff diaphragm motion by TM-mode) before and after pleural drainage. Primary end point aims to evaluate the feasability of deep breath inspiratory excursion in ipsilateral side of thoracocentesis by anterior subcostal approach in the mid-clavicular line in the right in patients with malignant pleural effusions. The liver or spleen was identified as a window for each hemidiaphragm. Secondary end points aim to evaluate - the feasability of quiet breath inspiratory motion , - the feasability of sniff diaphragm motion - the feasability of deep breath inspiratory motion by posterior method - the comparaison of feasibility with different types of breathing and or anterior or posterior approach for ultrasound - the feasability of the shape by B-mode. - the correlation between the change of the shape of ipsilateral diaphragm and the evolution of dyspnea, before and after thoracocentesis. - the correlation between the volume of pleural effusion evacuated and the evolution of dyspnea, before and after thoracocentesis. - the comparaison of the changing of dyspnea in patients with noticed paradoxal movement of diaphragm before thoracocentesis and patients with persistent paradoxal/or non persistant paradoxal movement of ipsilateral hémidiaphragm. - the correlation between the feasability of diaphragmatic ultrasound motion measurments evaluation and the body mass index. - the comparaison between the different diaphragmatic ultrsound times for anterior or posterior approach.

NCT ID: NCT04257864 Completed - Clinical trials for Non Small Cell Lung Cancer

Bevacizumab Versus Docetaxel/Erlotinib on Tumor Metrics in Patients With Previously Untreated Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer

Start date: November 2008
Phase:
Study type: Observational

To determine the more effective dosing sequence of intermittent erlotinib and docetaxel for treating patients with the diagnosis of advanced Non-Small-Lung-Cancer.

NCT ID: NCT04254497 Completed - Lung Cancer Clinical Trials

A Comprehensive Evaluation of Circulating Tumor DNA and Circulating Tumor Cells as a Predictive Marker in Lung Cancer

Start date: September 11, 2014
Phase:
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

This study evaluates the use of ctDNA and CTCs in predicting disease activity and drug response in lung cancer patients and serves to complement existing methods to achieve a non-invasive and accurate means to guide treatment decisions.

NCT ID: NCT04253509 Completed - Lung Cancer Clinical Trials

Liquid Biopsy Using Methylation Sequencing for Lung Cancer

Start date: February 3, 2020
Phase:
Study type: Observational

This study aims to investigate the utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) methylation sequencing in the diagnosis of primary lung cancer.

NCT ID: NCT04249362 Completed - Clinical trials for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Study of Durvalumab Following Radiation Therapy in Patients With Stage 3 Unresectable NSCLC Ineligible for Chemotherapy

DUART
Start date: November 26, 2020
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

This is a Phase II open-label, single-arm, multicenter, international study to evaluate the clinical activity of durvalumab in patients with Stage III unresectable NSCLC who are deemed to be ineligible for chemotherapy per Investigator assessment. Patients will be enrolled into 2 cohorts according to radiotherapy pretreatment dose (Cohort A: standard radiation therapy [60 gray (Gy) ± 10% or hypofractionated bioequivalent dose (BED)]; Cohort B: palliative radiation therapy [40 to < 54 Gy or hypofractionated BED])