View clinical trials related to Lumbar Spine Degeneration.
Filter by:This study aimed to evaluate the effect of epidural patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) on postoperative pain relief after lumbar spine surgeries. The eligible patients received two types of postoperative pain management: PCA and standard pain treatment. Comparisons between the two groups were made in terms of postoperative pain level.
The purpose of this clinical study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of the OsteoAdapt SP as a replacement for the autograft standard of care bone graft within the interbody cage, as well as identify the OsteoAdapt SP dose to be investigated in a future pivotal study.
To identify the current mortality rate for initial ALIF procedures. Establish/prove mortality rates for this operation have dropped in the past decade.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate if peri-operative zolpidem for posterior lumbar spinal fusion improves patient reported outcomes following surgery.
Lumbar spinal surgery is one of the operations performed for the treatment of leg and back pain. Severe pain may occur at postoperative period in patients following lumbar fusion surgery. The ultrasound(US) guided erector spina plan block (ESPB) is injected with a local anesthetic into the deep fascia of the erector spinae. Visualization of sonoanatomy with US is simple and the spread of local anesthetic solution can be seen easily the deep fascia of the erector spinae. In the literature, it has been reported that ESPB provides effective analgesia after lumbar spine surgery. The surgical team visualizes the transverse processes and erector spina muscle during surgery. The aim of this study is to compare US-guided ESPB and surgical infiltrative ESPB for postoperative analgesia management after lumbar spinal fusion surgery.
Symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis is the most common indication for spinal surgery. However, more than one-third of the patients undergoing surgery for lumbar stenosis report dissatisfaction with the results. On the other hand, conservative treatment has shown positive results in some cases. This trial will compare the outcomes of surgical versus non-surgical treatment for lumbar stenosis.
The proposed research is an important extension of an ongoing perioperative personalized analgesia and intravenous opioid pharmacogenetic research. This research focuses on two of the most commonly used oral opioid analgesics, oxycodone, and methadone, in adults following lumbar spinal fusion and decompression surgery. Genetic signature and combinatorial pharmacogenetic approaches perform better than single-gene associations. This innovative translational research will for the first time evaluate simultaneously the effects of multiple genes and interactions on oxycodone and methadone's pharmacokinetics and optimal clinical dosing and on its safety and efficacy in the highly vulnerable pediatric population. This research's multigenetic signature findings can be easily extrapolated to adults undergoing surgery or using oxycodone and/or methadone for chronic and cancer pain and in identifying opioid abusers at risk of severe respiratory depression and death. When methadone is given in addition to oxycodone for inpatient pectus excavatum repair and idiopathic scoliosis spinal fusions according to new departmental protocols, methadone pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics will also be evaluated.
This study is designed to collect safety and efficacy data on patients who plan to undergo a single-level total joint replacement of the lumbar spine using the MOTUS device (MOTUS Total Joint Replacement procedure) to demonstrate noninferiority to lumbar interbody fusion with respect to composite endpoints.
To compare post-operative wound complications in patients randomized to normal saline versus Irrisept solution and any other adverse reactions from the solution.
With the change of lifestyle and the aging of the population, the prevalence of Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) in my country is increasing year by year, and surgery is one of the main ways to treat LDH. Surgical robots have good application prospects in the surgical treatment of patients with lumbar degenerative diseases. Studies have shown that orthopedic robot-assisted surgery has less soft tissue damage, small surgical incisions, less bleeding, high safety, and quick postoperative recovery; it reduces the risk of spinal cord and blood vessel damage that may be caused during manual operations; does not require repeated fluoroscopy To determine the position of the nail, reduce the intraoperative radiation by more than 70%, and reduce the risk of patient infection. The current clinical research on robotics technology mainly stays in the aspects of accuracy, effectiveness, and safety. If the technology is promoted in clinical applications, the support of health economics evaluation data is urgently needed. This study hopes to apply robot-assisted technology in LDH surgical treatment through observational research design, evaluate the therapeutic effect and treatment cost of robot-assisted surgery and conventional surgery, focus on health economics evaluation, and provide treatment options for patients and medical care in the health sector. The reasonable allocation of resources and the promotion and application of this technology provide data support.