Clinical Trials Logo

Low Back Pain clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Low Back Pain.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT02884466 Completed - Low Back Pain Clinical Trials

Comparison of Two Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation Interventions in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain

Start date: October 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Introduction Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a highly prevalent health condition, and the leading cause of years lived with disability. The high prevalence causes a substantial impact on patients, communities and health-care systems. There is a continuing challenge to offer evidence-based rehabilitation for patients with CLBP. There is a lack of studies on adequate follow-up approaches to maintain successful treatment. No earlier study has assessed if the positive treatment effects of a multidisciplinary rehabilitation intervention can be maintained with an intervention alternating between inpatient interventions and home-based activities. Aim To assess if a novel multidisciplinary rehabilitation intervention is more effective in maintaining successful treatment after 6 months, than a usual multidisciplinary rehabilitation intervention in patients with CLBP. The novel intervention is a 14-week program alternating between in total three weeks of inpatient intervention and home-based activities. This alternation allows the participants time and opportunity to adapt and transfer inpatient learning to activities and participation in their own environment in interaction with everyday life situations and surroundings. Usual care is a four-week inpatient intervention. It is hypothesized that the intervention will be superior to usual care. Method The study will be conducted at The Danish Rheumatism Associations' rehabilitation centre Sano Aarhus. 160 participants with CLBP will be randomly allocated to one of two groups. The novel intervention consists of: 1) a pre-admission day, 2) two weeks of home-based activities, 3) two-week inpatient period, 4) four weeks of home-based activities, 5) 1st two-days inpatient follow-up, 6) six weeks of home-based activities and 7) 2nd two-days inpatient follow-up. Usual care consists of a four-week inpatient intervention. The two groups will be compared according to disability, pain, pain self-efficacy, quality of life, depression and exercise capacity. Relevance The present study has emerged out of the fields where patients, clinicians and researchers intersect and is consequently highly clinically relevant. If positive treatment effects can be maintained or even improved in the long term, the results may serve as inspiration for the design of multidisciplinary rehabilitation interventions in clinical practice; this will be valuable for future patients with CLBP.

NCT ID: NCT02884440 Completed - Low Back Pain Clinical Trials

Transverse Abdominis Plane Block for Anterior Approach Spine Surgery

TAP ALIF
Start date: November 7, 2016
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

Therapeutic, prospective, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, in intention to treat, monocentric study to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of a bilateral TAP block after spine surgery with 24 hours morphine consumption

NCT ID: NCT02883634 Completed - Low Back Pain Clinical Trials

Specific or Non-Specific Manipulation for Patients With Back Pain

Start date: April 3, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

We aim to evaluate the long-term effects of 10 sessions of spinal manipulative therapy applied in a vertebral region-specific or region nonspecific level immediately after treatment and 3 and 6 months after randomization.

NCT ID: NCT02883569 Completed - Low Back Pain Clinical Trials

Comparative Effectiveness Study for Surgery vs. Non-Surgery in Patients With Low Back Pain

CES_SNS_LBP
Start date: September 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Purpose: Comparative effectiveness research (CER) between surgical and non-surgical treatment for patients with low back pain Hypothesis: There will be significant differences in surgical and non-surgical treatment effect in patients who need operation for herniated intervertebral disc and spinal stenosis.

NCT ID: NCT02876432 Completed - Low Back Pain Clinical Trials

Evaluating Acupuncture Relationship With the Catecholaminergic Pathway

Start date: October 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Activation of the sympathetic nervous system attenuates inflammation via catecholamines, recent advances in electroacupuncture allow activating critical neuronal networks with the release of catecholamines the aim of this research was to evaluate de effect of electroacupuncture in the activation of sympathetic nervous system and the control of low back pain in athletes

NCT ID: NCT02874950 Completed - Low Back Pain Clinical Trials

Effective Methods of Reducing Lower Back, Neck and Shoulder Pain Among Office Workers

Start date: March 2016
Phase: Phase 1
Study type: Interventional

Background:Musculoskeletal discomforts (MSD), especially in the neck, lower back and shoulder areas, are some of the most common issues among office workers. The Social Security Organization (SOCSO) in Malaysia caps number of cases involving musculoskeletal injuries at a maximum of 10,000 per year. Objectives: The primary aims of this research were to: 1. Measure the prevalence of MSD in a sample of office workers; 2. Test effective methods of reducing lower back, neck and shoulder pain in this sample by training exercise, or ergonomics modification, or both of them; and 3. Assess discomfort scores and the range of motion of the lower back, neck and shoulder muscles among the office workers after undertaking the different methods for a period of 6 months. Methods: In a true experimental design, from 10,000 staff in Telecom Malaysia,onehundred and forty two office workers (of whom 50 were male), aged 20-50 y, were allocated randomly, from 3 different locations (Bangsar, Puchung, and Damansara), to one of three intervention groups (receiving training exercise, receiving modified ergonomics, receiving a combination of exercise and ergonomics modification) and a control group (receiving none of these interventions). The Cornell MSD Questionnaire was used to measure musculoskeletal discomforts, with focus on pain severity, before treatment and after 2, 4 and 6 months of the interventions. The range of motion (ROM) of the hip, neck, shoulder and knee were measured by a 12 inch goniometer, and the Borg CR10 scale was used to measure the perceived exertion of training exercises. The rapid office strain assessment (ROSA) questionnaire was used to assess the strain associated with office work. Height and weight were also measured to calculate the body mass index (BMI).

NCT ID: NCT02871739 Completed - Depression Clinical Trials

A Trial Comparing Approaches to Shared Decision Making Skills Training for Clinicians

Start date: July 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The Health Decision Sciences Center (HDSC) staff has deployed different approaches to training clinicians to engage patients in shared decision making for common medical tests and treatments. The purpose of the study is to compare the effectiveness of shared decision making (SDM) skills training courses using standardized patient interactions (SPI) and written evaluations.

NCT ID: NCT02868034 Completed - Low Back Pain Clinical Trials

Optimization of Spinal Manipulative Therapy Protocols

Start date: February 22, 2017
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

Research on spinal manipulative therapy for individuals with low back pain has been hampered by a lack of understanding of which of the physiologic effects produced by spinal manipulation are related to clinical benefit, and how these effects can be used to optimize treatment outcomes. Prior research has identified physiologic effects that relate to the clinical benefits from spinal manipulation treatment. The goal of this project is to examine strategies to use these effects to identify optimized treatment protocols. The results of this project will provide critical information for future clinical trials related to spinal manipulation.

NCT ID: NCT02864732 Completed - Low Back Pain Clinical Trials

Stabilization Exercises Alone vs Stabilization Exercises Plus Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in People With Chronic Low Back Pain

Start date: January 2014
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to investigate the feasibility of applying neuromuscular electrical stimulation on the lumbar spine, to report how tolerable the intervention is, and whether the electrical stimulation improve pain, function and muscle strength.

NCT ID: NCT02862964 Completed - Low Back Pain Clinical Trials

Accuro Versus Traditional Landmark Palpation Technique to Determine Accurate Spinal Level for Procedures

Start date: February 2016
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Currently, at UVA, handheld ultrasound devices (like those used to view an unborn baby) are only two dimensional. The Accuro is a three dimensional handheld ultrasound device. This device uses sound waves to create pictures of the spine in three dimensions. This may allow the physician to view the spine in more detail for procedures such as spinal anesthesia and other diagnostic procedures. The investigators aim to assess the benefit of using the Accuro versus traditional landmark palpation technique to determine accurate spinal level for procedures. Patients who undergo interventional pain procedure per standard care under fluoroscopy and require the presence of an anesthesia provider at the UVA Pain Management Clinic will be approached for enrollment. Anesthesia Providers will first identify the L4/L5 space using the traditional technique of palpating the iliac crests to estimate spinal level, which will be marked with a single dot from a marking pen. The provider will then use the Accuro 3000 to identify the L4/L5 interspace and mark this point with two dots. Participants will then be taken into the fluoroscopy suite for their scheduled procedure. Since the skin marks will not show up on fluoroscopy, and metal instrument will be laid on the skin at the interspace or interspaces that were marked using the palpation and Accuro techniques. The anesthesiology attending provider in the fluoroscopy suite will then confirm the true interspace position of these marks under fluoroscopy. It will then be recorded how many spaces off the palpation and Accuro techniques are from the intended L4/L5 level.