Clinical Trials Logo

Local Anesthesia clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Local Anesthesia.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT02440347 Completed - Local Anesthesia Clinical Trials

Effects of Articaine Computer-controlled and Conventional Delivery for Anterior and Middle Superior Alveolar Nerve Block

Start date: June 2014
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare pulpal anesthesia and cardiovascular parameters obtained with 0.6 ml of 4% articaine with epinephrine (1:100.000) for anterior and middle superior alveolar nerve (AMSA) block performed by standard and computer-controlled delivery in healthy volunteers.

NCT ID: NCT02371759 Completed - Diabetes Mellitus Clinical Trials

Lidocaine + Clonidine for Intraoral Anesthesia in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Type 2

LCIOADMT2
Start date: June 2013
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to determine whether 2% lidocaine (L) + clonidine (C) (15 mcg/ml) as a vasoconstrictor achieves efficient (equal or better parameters of intraoral local anesthesia in comparison to 2% lidocaine + epinephrine (E) (1:80 000)) and safe (stable cardiovascular parameters - systolic, diastolic, mean blood pressure and heart rate) intraoral local anesthesia in patients with Diabetes mellitus type 2.

NCT ID: NCT02226913 Completed - Local Anesthesia Clinical Trials

Effect of Sodium Bicarbonate Buffered Lidocaine on the Success of IAN Block of Teeth With Irreversible Pulpitis

Start date: February 2013
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

Buffering of local anesthetics (alkalinization) has been suggested in achieving pain control. The purpose of this prospective, randomized, double-blind study was to evaluate the effect of adding 0.6 mL 8.4% sodium bicarbonate to 3.0 mL 2% lidocaine with 1: 80,000 epinephrine on the success rate of IAN block for endodontic treatment of mandibular molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis.

NCT ID: NCT02206022 Completed - Local Anesthesia Clinical Trials

Remifentanil And Local Anesthesia Compared With Local Anesthesia For The Insertion Of Central Venous Catheters

REMIDOLCATH
Start date: August 2014
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

At present, there is no reference protocol for Central Venous Catheter (CVC) insertion assuring analgesia, anxiolysis and safety. Medical teams use various levels of analgesia and anesthesia to realize this gesture, from single local anesthesia to general anesthesia. Remifentanil has been shown to decrease pain scores for insertion and removal of long-term central venous access. Remifentanil is also often employed for pediatric or labor analgesia for short acts as procedural sedation.

NCT ID: NCT02196441 Not yet recruiting - Satisfaction Clinical Trials

Evaluation of Deep Topical Fornix Nerve Block Versus Topical Anaesthesia Procedure

Start date: August 2014
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

General anaesthesia now a days is not the first choice in phakic intra ocular lens surgery (Phakic IOL) , the short duration of the surgery, general anaesthesia complications, decrease the length of hospital stay and decreasing the costs direct the interest to the regional anaesthesia By the time the traditional retro and peribulbar injections recede to a newer techniques that is safer and cheaper, sub tenon's block using a blunt needle took over due to the more safety profile Even though, still serious problems can occur specially in patients with long axial length. Deep topical fornix nerve block anaesthesia (DTFNB) and topical anaesthesia gradually took over with promising and successful results, decreasing length of hospital stay and increasing patient satisfaction and fewer margins of complications. In this study the investigators compared topical anaesthesia alone with DTFNBA in patients undergoing posterior chamber phakic IOL surgery (Visian ICL).

NCT ID: NCT01860235 Completed - Pain, Postoperative Clinical Trials

EMLA Topical Anesthetic During Scaling and Root Planing

Start date: June 2010
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Injectable anesthesics previous to subgingival scaling and root planing (SRP) presents some disadvantages like fear of the needle insertion, long-lasting effect and prolonged dampening of adjacent tissues. This study will compare the intrapocket anesthetic effectiveness of a skin topical anesthesic EMLA with intrapocket 2% benzocaine, intrapocket placebo and injectable anaesthesia for SRP in a Split-mouth, double-blind, clinical trial study.

NCT ID: NCT01742559 Completed - Pain Clinical Trials

The Anesthetic Effect of Anterior Middle Superior Alveolar Technique

Start date: January 2009
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Anesthesia of the soft and hard tissues in the maxilla may require up to five injections. Thus, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the anesthetic efficacy in buccal tissues after the use of the anterior middle superior alveolar (AMSA) and supraperiosteal techniques during subgingival scaling and root planning (SRP).

NCT ID: NCT01625780 Terminated - Local Anesthesia Clinical Trials

Comparing Ilioinguinal Single-shot and Three-layer Blocks

Start date: April 2012
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Ilio-inguinal nerve blocks have a long history of efficacy in treatment of post-operative pain following inguinal surgery. Several anatomic studies have shown that the nerves supplying the inguinal area have a certain degree of variability with respect to their location between the internal and external oblique layers of the anterior abdominal wall. Furthermore, the standard single-shot approach to ilio-inguinal nerve blocks has a significant incidence of unintended femoral nerve block, which can impair patients' ability to walk after surgery. The investigators are proposing a new approach to the ilio-inguinal nerve block, which divides the total dose of local anesthetic into 3 equal parts, injecting each 1/3 into different layers of the anterior abdominal wall and sub-cutaneously. The investigators intend to show that this new technique, the Tsui approach, provides equal analgesia to the standard single-shot ultrasound-guided ilio-inguinal nerve block, while being faster to perform and having a lower incidence of unintended femoral nerve blockade. Patients under age 10 who are scheduled for elective inguinal surgery (hydrocele repair, orchidopexy, and inguinal hernia repair), who have already consented to an ilio-inguinal nerve block that is commonly placed for this type of procedure, will be approached to participate in this study. No increased risk is anticipated for these patients, as both ultrasound-guided and blind techniques are equally well-accepted in the literature for this type of block, and in addition there are few vascular or neural structures in this anatomical area (just medial and inferior to the anterior superior iliac spine) that may be damaged. Follow-up will be limited to an assessment of pain scores in the PACU post-operatively and any unintended femoral nerve blockade in post-PACU. This will not delay their hospital discharge as these are same-day surgery patients.

NCT ID: NCT01522066 Terminated - Analgesia Clinical Trials

Catheter-over Needle: Outpatient Study

Start date: January 2012
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

An alternative to general anesthesia - which puts a patient completely to sleep - is regional anesthesia, where local anesthetic is injected under the skin to freeze or 'block' a nerve or set of nerves. This method allows a patient to be awake during surgery and avoids any unpleasant after-effects of general anesthetic. A regional block is normally performed by inserting a needle under the skin so that the needle tip is near the nerve to be blocked, followed by injection of a single shot of enough local anesthetic to block any sensation that the nerve normally provides. Although regional nerve blocks provide pain relief during a surgical procedure, they eventually wear off, occasionally leaving the patient to contend with localized pain in the part of the body that was operated on. In these cases, over-the-counter painkillers like Tylenol or Advil may not be strong enough to completely take away the pain. We believe that, instead of giving a single shot of anesthetic, patients can be fitted with a catheter - a thin, flexible tube - that can be used to deliver one dose of local anesthetic to block the nerve before surgery and which could also be used to deliver a second dose of anesthetic just prior to discharge from the hospital. This way, the patient still only receives one needle poke, but their pain can be better managed following surgery. Our study will compare the post-nerve block pain profiles of individuals who have received a single-shot injection of local anesthetic versus those who have received two doses via the catheter delivery method.

NCT ID: NCT01522053 Terminated - Local Anesthesia Clinical Trials

Catheter-over-needle: Inpatient Study

Start date: January 2012
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

When anesthesiologists perform a regional nerve block, they will often put a catheter - a flexible plastic tube - in the patient to allow for continuous delivery of local anesthetic. This allows the nerve(s) to be 'frozen' so that the patient is more comfortable during and after surgery. The most common method of placing the catheter close to a nerve involves threading the catheter through a needle which has been inserted under the skin. Because the catheter is very thin and flexible, it does not thread well through tissue and will buckle and kink when enough force is applied to it. Another problem is that the puncture hole left by the needle is larger than the diameter of the catheter, meaning that when the needle is withdrawn, the catheter is not secure, which increases the chance that it will dislodge and cause leakage of local anesthetic. One solution to these problems is to use a catheter placement method similar to how intravenous catheters are installed. In this method, the catheter fits around ('over') the needle, which results in more support for the catheter while it is being pushed under the skin. We wish to examine if a catheter-over-needle method would be useful for placing a catheter to deliver local anesthetic during peripheral nerve blockade. We will compare the catheter-over-needle method to the currently used catheter-through-needle method on patients who require continuous anesthetic delivery for their surgery; half the patients will receive anesthetic through one method, and the other half will receive anesthetic through the other method. We believe that using the catheter-over-needle method will result in more secure placement of the catheter and more efficient delivery of local anesthetic.