View clinical trials related to Liver Neoplasms.
Filter by:The proposed ONE TEAM Study is an 18-month, cluster randomized controlled trial. This study will use a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART) design with a second randomization for the intervention group using a dynamic treatment regimen approach. The investigators propose to randomize 800 adults with newly-diagnosed selected cancers treated with curative intent (breast, prostate, colorectal, endometrial, non-small cell lung, and endometrial) and with >1 selected cardiovascular disease (CVD) comorbidity (hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia). Participants will be enrolled through Duke Cancer Institute and two community-based oncology practices, both settings serving socio-demographically diverse populations. The unit of randomization will be the PCP clinic; there will be ~80 PCP clinics across North Carolina involved in the study. The overarching goals of this study are to improve chronic disease management and communication among cancer survivors by engaging PCPs as active members of the cancer care team and reframing the message to cancer survivors and providers. A diversity supplement with retrospective and qualitative components has been added to abstract older adults with solid tumors who underwent cancer surgery at DUHS. Aims include (1) to estimate the prevalence of cardiovascular complications ≤90 postoperative days among older adults with solid tumors undergoing surgery, and its association with care coordination between surgical providers and PCPs ; (2) to develop a risk index for cardiovascular complications ≤90 days of surgery among older adult patients with a solid tumor; and (3) to Assess experience and perceptions of PCPs on care coordination with surgical providers of older adults with a solid tumor following cancer surgery.
Objective:To confirm the effect of preoperative oral nutrition therapy on patients with malnourished before liver cancer resection. Study design:Prospective, randomized, controlled clinical study. Primary end point: incidence of all complications 30 days after surgery.
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer. Patients with HCCs usually have a poor prognosis. Hepatocarcinogenesis is an intricate and multistep process. Detecting and staging early HCC in patients with liver cirrhosis are still challenging for imaging techniques. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) and gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (EOB-MRI) are widely used in clinical practice. EOB-MRI has advantages of high detecting rate for small lesions, high sensitivity of hepatobiliary phase and extensive image information. Sonazoid has the advantage of offering a unique post-vascular phase, also called the Kupffer phase. Therefore, malignant tumors with few or no Kupffer cells appear as contrast defects, with respect to the relatively well-enhanced surrounding liver in the postvascular phase. The diagnostic efficacies of these two imaging methods have not been well studied. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare the efficacies of Sonazoid-CEUS and EOB-MRI in patients with high risk of HCC, and to compare the detection ability for malignant tumors by Kupffer phase and hepatobiliary phase.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of simple local ablation, local ablation combined with apatinib, local ablation combined with apatinib and PD-1 antibody SHR-1210 for the treatment of advanced liver cancer.
This is a phase II, open-label, prospective single-centered study. Subjects who meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be allocated to appropriate cohorts: 1) gastric cancer, 2) esophageal cancer and 3) hepatocellular carcinoma. Each cancer cohort group will be treated with two cycles of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor of IMC-001 (1 cycle = 2 weeks) followed by curative resection and be followed up consecutively.
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the second commonest cause of cancer death worldwide. It is the third leading cause of cancer death in Hong Kong. Liver transplantation (LT) is the curative treatment of choice for HCC as it has the advantage of removing the tumour and also the premalignant cirrhotic liver. Milan (solitary tumour <5cm, or up to 3 tumours, each <3cm) and University of California San Francisco (UCSF) criteria (solitary tumour ≤6.5cm, up to 3 tumours with none >4.5cm, and total tumour diameter ≤8cm) provide the benchmark requirements for LT, at which a 5-year survival of >70% and recurrence rate ranging from 5-15% can be achieved. However, organ shortage and waiting time for liver grafts remain the greatest obstacles for deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). It has been reported that the waiting list dropout rate is 7 to 11% at 6 months and 38% at 12 months. Several therapeutic procedures including transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) have been studied as bridging therapy before DDLT, aiming at reducing waiting list dropout rate and recurrence after LT, and improving post-transplant survival. The investigators have carried out a prospective study on HCC patients treated with bridging SBRT before LT. The investigators used dual tracer (18F-fluorodeoxyglucose [FDG] and 11carbon-acetate [ACC]) positron-emission tomography with integrated computed tomography (PET-CT) and magnetic resonance imaging with gadoxetate disodium as baseline and subsequent imaging assessment before and after SBRT, hoping the PET-CT can help better identify those who benefit from SBRT and to prioritise those with poor response so that they can be better channeled to LT.
Several aspects on the use of portal vein embolization (PVE) are poorly studied and todays recommendations are based on low-grade evidence. In this Scandinavian multicenter cohort study we will study some of the controversial aspects on the use of PVE to try to provide clearer answers on its optimal use. Six tertiary university hospital hepatobiliary units in Sweden, Norway and Denmark participate and contribute with all PVE procedures performed at their units during the study period. We will then study several aspects PVE technique in relation to induced hypertrophy and surgical outcome.
Liver is special organ, which can regenerate. On that ability there are many treatment modalities, where liver resection is performed, especially in cancer patients with liver metastases. Liver regeneration provides an opportunity for these patients to undergo multiple treatment regimes and liver resections to achieve curability. There are many factors that impair liver regeneration. One of these factors is chemotherapy. Literature data on impact of chemotherapy to liver regeneration is ambiguous. Therefore we aim to research impact of chemotherapy to liver regeneration.
The objective of this study is to demonstrate the superiority of the laparoscopic approach over the open approach in the resection of colorectal liver metastases, by examining the reduction of postoperative complications (including mortality), measured using the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) within 90 days of the procedure or regardless of the date during the hospital stay.
Liver cancer is a common malignant tumor in China, and its incidence rate ranks third and remains high. The treatment of liver cancer has made some progress in recent years, mainly the progress of radical treatment such as surgery and ablation. For liver cancer, due to the emergence of molecularly targeted drugs such as sorafenib and immunological checkpoint inhibitors, the systemic therapeutic effect of advanced liver cancer is improved, and the curative effect is further improved. In recent years, immunotherapy has become one of the clinical treatment options for cancer. T lymphocytes are a cell with cell killing ability in the immune system, and programmed death factor 1 (PD-1) is an important inhibitory receptor on the surface of T lymphocytes. It is known that the ligands of PD-1 are PD-L1 and PD-L2, and studies have found that a variety of tumor cells have high expression of PD-L1 ligand on the surface. At present, clinical research on target drugs for PD-1 has included dozens of solid tumors or hematological tumors. The results of clinical studies that have been completed and the interim results of some studies indicate that anti- PD-1 antibody drugs are more effective and safer than previous treatments. Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) often undergo liver cancer resection, but the recurrence rate can reach 70% to 100%, which seriously affects the treatment outcome and long-term survival rate. Early recurrence of liver cancer is mainly related to the invasiveness of the tumor. Microvascular invasion, non-anatomical hepatectomy, AFP greater than 32 ng/ml, tumor diameter greater than 5 cm, and incomplete tumor capsule are risk factors for recurrence within 2 years after surgery. Hence, it is necessary to determine the risk factors for HCC recurrence and the markers for continuous monitoring of anti-tumor response before and after surgery. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) is an integral part of "liquid biopsy" and has great potential to change the current treatment modality in the cancer field. CTCs are derived from solid tumors and are associated with hematogenous metastasis. Therefore, analyzing the level of CTC has clinical guiding significance. For liver cancer patients, overall survival (OS) tended to be poorer in patients with CTCs. Although surgical treatment of liver cancer has benefited most patients with liver cancer, monitoring postoperative recurrence, further improving the long-term prognosis of liver cancer, postoperative detection of CTCs and other related indicators, combined with targeted, immune and other related treatments for further study. It is expected to receive 100 patients (50 treatment groups, 50 control groups). Patients who underwent immunotherapy after surgery were assigned to the immunotherapy group, and patients who were not treated with sorafenib after surgery were classified as the control group. All patients underwent 7 CTCs tests (immunomagnetic beads negative enrichment-targeted PCR) before, 7 days after surgery and 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th, and 12th postoperatively. All patients were observed from the observation period. After the liver cancer resection, the patient was observed to have died, lost to follow-up or the end of the study.