View clinical trials related to Liver Failure.
Filter by:In critically ill patients with liver disease like cirrhosis or ACLF, fluid therapy needs to be instituted after identification of patients who will be fluid responsive and initiate appropriate inotropes early to prevent the mortality associated with fluid overload. The parameters and methodology used for assessing fluid responsiveness have been studied earlier, but the optimum method is not established. Existing recommendations based on data regarding fluid responsiveness and choice of fluid for resuscitation from intensive care units in general cannot be applied to those with liver disease as the hemodynamic alterations that occur with liver disease, presence of hypoalbuminemia at baseline and presence of cardiac dysfunction interfere with the conventional methods of fluid status assessment, fluid responsiveness as well as the response to different types of resuscitation fluids. Therefore the investigators attempt to compare various methods to estimate current intravascular volume status of patient which could be helpful in guiding fluid therapy.
Acute liver failure patients posed high mortality rate despite receiving standard therapy. The severity and mortality even higher in patients with underlying liver disease. Acute liver failure cause hyperinflammatory response in early stage and immunoparalysis in later stage. The surge of proinflammatory cytokines leads to multiorgan failure and more liver injury. Subsequent immunoparalysis may lead to lethal secondary infections. Liver support system had been used in acute and acute ontop chronic liver disease for last several decades. Double plasma molecular adsorption system (DPMAS) is one of the promising non-biological liver support system that have been extensively investigated in acute ontop chronic liver failure from hepatits B viral. DPMAS circuit consist of BS330 (bilirubin adsorber) and HA330 (Cytokines adsorber). Thus, DPMAS can also remove various cytokines. The effect of DPMAS on immune function in these patients has not been explored. Recent randomized controlled trial by Srisawat et al. demonstrated improvement of mHLA-DR in septic shock patients who received polymyxin B extracorporeal therapy compare to control arm. Since liver failure show change of immunological profile resemble to sepsis. Investigators proposed that removal of toxic liver toxins and lethal cytokines by DPMAS will improve immunological profiles in acute ontop chronic liver failure patients. Investigators plan to conduct a randomized controlled trial in acute ontop chronic liver failure patients who admitted to intensive care unit. Investigators plan to compare the immunomodulatory effects of DPMAS with standard treatments.
The CYTOHEP study is a prospective, randomized, single center, open-label, controlled intervention trial to assess the benefit of extracorporeal hemoadsorption using the CytoSorb device in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure. The primary goal for this trial is to assess whether the CytoSorb device used in addition to continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) will be able to significantly reduce bilirubin in the patient blood as compared to the control group treated with CRRT alone (i.e., without extracorporeal hemoadsorption). The rationale for this study is based on considerations about the role of systemic inflammation in acute decompensation of liver cirrhosis and ACLF, in-vitro data of the effectiveness CytoSorb for the removal of molecules with a pathophysiological role in acute-on-chronic liver failure, and recent reports on the successful use of extracorporeal hemoadsorption in combination with CRRT in critically ill patients with acute liver dysfunction.
This single-center prospective observational study aims at characterization of pathogenesis of ACLF. There will be three different cohorts investigated with the main endpoint mortality in these groups. 1. SAPIENT = Sepsis ACLF patients, to investigate the differences between ACLF and sepsis in cirrhosis 2. PROACT = Portal mediators as ACLF Targets, to assess portal venous biomarkers in patients receiving TIPS leading to ACLF and identify potential treatment targets 3. ELITE = prEdictors of beneficial LIver Tx in ACFL patiEnts, to assess in ACLF-patients receiving liver transplantation predictors of survival, which may improve selection of ACLF-patients for liver transplantation Secondary endpoints will be different in the three different cohorts and biological material will be collected for separate ancillary studies.
End stage liver disease is prone to thrombocytopenia. This study is a multi-center, randomized, prospective, randomized controlled Phase IV Clinical trial to discuss the Efficacy and Safety of Avatrombopag in Patients with End-stage Liver Disease and Thrombocytopenia.
TReatment for ImmUne Mediated PathopHysiology (TRIUMPH) is a multi-center, three arm, randomized, controlled trial of immunosuppressive therapy for children with acute liver failure. The study will determine if suppressing inflammatory responses with either corticosteroids or equine anti-thymocyte globulin therapy improves survival for children with this rare, life-threatening condition.
In the past ten years, the extracorporeal liver support system has been widely used in clinical practice as a first-line treatment of liver failure. Plasma exchange (PE) can remove toxic substances in ACLF patients, reduce liver damage, and replenish coagulation factors, albumin and immunoglobulins, thereby improving the liver's microenvironment and accelerating liver regeneration and functional recovery. The ACLF study showed that PE can improve the symptoms of patients and improve the short-term prognosis of patients, but there are still studies showing that PE does not significantly improve the short-term prognosis of patients. Therefore, the therapeutic effect of PE on ACLF is still controversial. We consider that some people may benefit from plasma exchange, and new indicators are needed to guide disease stratification treatment. Our multi-center prospective data show that plasma exchange has a tendency to improve survival in ACLF-2. After stratifying with ADP inhibition rate in ACLF-2, patients with ADP inhibition rate greater than 30% will be treated 28 days after PE treatment. The prognosis is improving. Therefore, we consider that PE is expected to reduce the mortality of patients with ACLF 2 with an ADP suppression rate greater than 30%, but prospective large-sample clinical studies are still needed.
Liver resection remains the only curative option for primary or metastatic liver cancer, but a more accurate prediction of post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is needed to further reduce morbidity and mortality and to extend the indication to a wider patient population. Magnetic resonance Imaging (MRI) is a promising new source of liver function tests as it can provide segmental function alongside measurements of perfusion, tissue structure and standard morphological assessment. The primary aim of HEPARIM is to determine if quantitative MRI biomarkers of liver function and perfusion can improve predictions of post-hepatectomy liver function, as measured by an indocyanine green (ICG) liver function test. Secondary aims is to validate the MRI measurements of liver function against ICG. HEPARIM is an observational cohort study recruiting patients referred locally for a one- or two-stage liver resection of 2 segments or more. Before surgery, all participants will undergo an ICG liver function test and a Dynamic Gadoxetate-enhanced (DGE) MRI scan of the liver. The ICG test will be repeated at one day after surgery. The Gadoxetate Clearance (GC) of the future liver remnant (FLR-GC) will be determined from the DGE-MRI data and correlated to the post-operative ICG R15 as primary outcome measure. Preoperative ICG R15 will be correlated against GC of the whole liver (WL-GC) to address the secondary objective. In patients that undergo a staged hepatectomy, an additional MRI and ICG test will be performed before the first stage to assess its effect on volumetric and functional growth of the FLR. Additional pre- and postoperative data will be collected from medical records including demographics and medical histories, biochemistry, pathology and radiology reports, and any long-term outcome data collected in the 90-day follow-up visit. These data will be used in a multi-variate analysis to determine which preoperative biomarkers are most predictive of immediate and long-term outcomes, to identify the added value of functional MRI over routine clinical markers, and to derive a multi-variate prediction model that can be validated in future studies.
Post hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is one of the most severe complications after liver re-section. Preoperative evaluation of liver function is complicated and imprecise. The volume and function needed for each individual patient is unknown and the methods used for evaluation are uncertain. Preoperative MRI with Gadolinium may give dynamic information regarding liver function correlating with postoperative liver failure. A retrospective analysis will be performed regarding this topic.
Efficient immunosuppressive therapy and improved surgical techniques have developed liver transplantation as a well-established and life-saving treatment. The 1-year survival rate of approximately 85-90%. Acute cellular rejection (ACR) is one of the main causes of liver dysfunction (LD) after liver trans- plantation, occurring 30% to 70% of transplanted patients and potentially leading to allograft failure. In addition to ACR, presence of sepsis, drug injury, viral infections like CMV or recurrence of viral hepatitis is also other causes of graft dysfunction. Laboratory tests are commonly used as less invasive methods of monitoring allograft rejection, but they are not specific to rejection and are often elevated in other types of graft dysfunction too. Till date the immunosuppressive regimen in liver transplant recipient is considered as an art in absence of an objective measures of the immune state. Therapeutic drug monitoring has little value in the assessment of the immune state and is always used as a supportive guide. The development of specific immune monitoring assays to measure the net immunosuppressive state in a transplant recipient would allow a more individualized therapeutic regimen Patients with altered gut microbiota had more chances of infection and longer course of hospital stay. Probiotics could mediate beneficial effects in graft rejection. Dysbiosis activates T cells through PAMPS and causes the inflammatory injury in the graft liver. The studies shown that lower Eubacteria, Bifidobacterium, Faecal bacterium and Lactobacillus with abundance of Enterococcus and Enterobacteriaceae. They restored to near normal after transplant in majority. This is known that there is a dysbiosis in the natural history of ACLF or decompensated cirrhosis, and often correlated to complications like-endotoxemia, sepsis, worsening liver failure and poor survival. This has led to consider fecal microbiota modulation as an emerging therapy. Liver transplant and consequent recovery, there is over all change in the recipient homeostatic milieu as well as the immune milieu and the same may be happening to the gut flora too.It's well known that liver has animprint of resident gut flora. The preliminary rat model showed alteration of gut flora to predict the development acute cellular rejection before it happens. Similarly the risk of infection is more among transplant recipients with decreased microbial diversity after liver transplant. However the data is scanty and there is an urgent need to understand the mechanism.. The present study was necessitated in view of emerging role of gut microflora and its influence on immune remodeling for the prediction of infection, rejection and may be an early biomarker for the graft dysfunction. This may be of varied cause in liver transplant recipients along with its impact on overall immune status. Uniqueness of the present study will be to understand the mechanism of development of sepsis or graft dysfunction in due course of time using high-throughput tools of single cell analysis in whole blood and gut microbiota alterations among liver transplant recipient as a cause for graft dysfunction in first year of live donor liver transplant.