Clinical Trials Logo

Laryngeal Masks clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Laryngeal Masks.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT03224611 Completed - Clinical trials for Laryngeal Mask Airway

Usefulness of Light Wand-guided Insertion of Flexible Reinforced Laryngeal Mask Airway

Start date: August 1, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Flexible LMA (Laryngeal mask airway) is very useful for variable situation but it is hard to insert in correct position because of it's flexible structure. Especially in classical way of manual LMA insertion, when the index finger could not guide the flexible LMA to the optimal position, we could not guarantee the correct position of the LMA. Therefore several studies have been investigated to improve this. The light wand is a kind of stylet which have a light on the tip. Recently some studies demonstrated the usefulness of the light wand which could be used for indicating correct position of the LMA. We hypothesised there will be two advantages if the light wand is used as a stylet of the flexible LMA. First the stylet could support the mildness of the flexible LMA, and second the lightness could confirm the correct position of the flexible LMA.

NCT ID: NCT03140228 Completed - Anesthesia Clinical Trials

Postoperative Sore Throat in Children: Comparison Between Two Supraglottic Devices, Ambu® AuraOnce™ Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) and I-Gel®.

Start date: June 15, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Sore throat is minor but well recognized complaint after receiving general anaesthesia. It is rated as 8th most undesirable outcome in postoperative period.It not only affects the patient's satisfaction but also can affect patient activities after leaving hospital. Many factors can contribute to postoperative sore throat and the incidence has been found to vary with the method by which airway is managed. The study is conducted to compare the severity and frequency of postoperative sore throat in children undergoing elective surgery following the use of AmbuAuraOnce LMA and I-Gel. The study will be done in children who are able to self-report the severity of sore throat. This study will help us to determine which supraglottic device (I-gel vs. AmbuAuraOnce LMA) is better in terms of causing less complication spells of sore throat. The use of such device will not only reduce the severity and frequency of postoperative sore throat that may affect the activities of patient after leaving hospital but also will improve satisfaction level of patient and parents.

NCT ID: NCT03139292 Completed - Laryngeal Masks Clinical Trials

Comparative Evaluation of Ambu AuraGain Laryngeal Mask and Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway

Start date: May 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Comparison of two different supraglottic airway devices i.e., the ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway (PLMA) and Ambu AuraGain, a third generation laryngeal mask Airway.

NCT ID: NCT03118596 Completed - Airway Management Clinical Trials

Fibre-optic Guided Tracheal Intubation Through SADs

Start date: May 24, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The study aims to establish which of the two second generation Supraglottic Airway Devices, the I-gel or the the laryngeal ask airway (LMA) Protector, is best suited to be used as a conduit to fibreoptic bronchoscope assisted tracheal intubation. The primary outcome of this will be the time to complete the tracheal intubation.

NCT ID: NCT03109678 Completed - Airway Management Clinical Trials

A Comparison of the Intubating Laryngeal Mask FASTRACH™ and the Intubating Laryngeal Mask Ambu Aura-i™

Start date: July 12, 2011
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The intubating laryngeal mask Fastrach™ is considered a gold standard for blind intubation as well as for fibreoptic guided intubation via a laryngeal mask. Recently, a single use version of the mask has been introduced. The Fastrach single use laryngeal mask is beng compared to the new, low-priced single use intubating laryngeal mask Ambu Aura-i™.

NCT ID: NCT03105739 Completed - Clinical trials for Respiratory Complication

Timing of Withdrawal of the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) in Children

Start date: October 5, 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this prospective, randomized study was to compare the incidence of adverse events associated with removal of the LMA either in deeply anesthetised or awake patients.

NCT ID: NCT03028896 Completed - Laryngeal Masks Clinical Trials

90° Rotation Technique for LMA FlexibleTM Insertion

Start date: April 2, 2015
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The 90° rotation technique is known to improve the success rate of conventional LMA but its effect in LMA FlexibleTM is not known. We tried to find if 90° rotation technique could increase the first attempt success rate of the insertion of LMA FlexibleTM compared to standard technique.

NCT ID: NCT03006250 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Anesthesia; Adverse Effect

The Effect of Desflurane vs Sevoflurane on Perioperative Respiratory Complications in Laryngeal Mask Airway Anesthesia

Start date: August 2016
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

The effects of desflurane versus sevoflurane in adult patients undergoing LMA anesthesia on respiratory events during a less than 2-hour elective surgery.

NCT ID: NCT02940652 Completed - Clinical trials for Laryngeal Mask Malposition

Laryngeal Mask Position in Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Children

LPIMRICH
Start date: October 2016
Phase:
Study type: Observational

The aim of the trial is to obtain and to describe the position of the laryngeal mask during elective magnetic resonance imaging in paediatric patient. The radiologic findings will be compared to the clinical performance of the laryngeal mask.

NCT ID: NCT02938039 Completed - Laryngeal Masks Clinical Trials

I-Gel vs Ambu Laryngeal Mask Airways in Infants and Children Undergoing Surgical Procedures

Start date: May 2015
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study will guide the anesthetists regarding the appropriate selection of the LMA in neonatal age group based on scientific basis. This study will add up to existing literature about the safety of LMA usage in neonates and infants. Furthermore it may shed some light on which LMA type will be more feasible and effective for neonatal/ infants usage.