Clinical Trials Logo

Laparoscopic clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Laparoscopic.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT06258317 Not yet recruiting - Inguinal Hernia Clinical Trials

Mesh Fixation Versus Non Fixation in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernioplasty

Start date: February 2024
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Inguinal hernia is one of the most common types of abdominal hernias. Laparoscopic hernioplasty of inguinal hernia is a good alternative to traditional open repairs even in simple unilateral primary inguinal hernia in terms of decrease post operative pain and complications with comparable recurrence rates.Two techniques are described in laparoscopic hernioplasty and have been extensively studied in randomised trials. The totally extraperitoneal (TEP) approach is more widely used than the transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approach. In this study we will compare between the results of mesh fixation and non fixation as regard operative and postoperative data.

NCT ID: NCT06166069 Completed - Incisional Hernia Clinical Trials

Early Surgical Outcomes in the Use of Hybrid Mesh for Incisional Hernia Repair: Results From a Multicenter Italian Study

SHIELD
Start date: January 1, 2021
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Background: Ventral hernia repair poses challenges for surgeons due to controversies in approach, patient selection, and mesh selection. The GORE® SYNECOR Intraperitoneal (IP) Biomaterial, a hybrid mesh, aims to balance durability and infection risk. Objective: To analyze extended-term outcomes of using the Intaperitoneal device for ventral and incisional hernia repair. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing surgery in eight Italian Surgery Centers, evaluating pIPOM and sIPOM techniques with GORE® SYNECOR IP Biomaterial. Preoperative evaluations included anthropometric measurements, comorbidities, CT scans, and GIQLI assessments. Surgical procedures and interventions were recorded. Postoperative complications, GIQLI changes, cosmesis, hernia recurrence, and mesh bulging were assessed.

NCT ID: NCT06098105 Recruiting - Ultrasound Clinical Trials

Laparoscopic vs Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block vs Laparoscopic Intraperitoneal Instillation of Local Anesthetic in Pediatrics

Start date: October 24, 2023
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The aim of this study is to compare laparoscopic -assisted, ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block and laparoscopic intraperitoneal instillation of local anesthetic in pediatrics undergoing inguinal hernia repair.

NCT ID: NCT05667181 Recruiting - Rectal Cancer Clinical Trials

The Application Value of da Vinci Linear Cutting Stapler SureForm in Robotic Anus Preserving Surgery for Rectal Cancer

Start date: December 1, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Anastomotic complications are serious complications after anus preserving surgery for rectal cancer,the instrument anastomosis technology are one of the factors that influence the occurrence of anastomotic complications after surgery,the laparoscopic linear cutting closure device used in robotic rectal cancer may increase the occurrence of anastomotic complications,but the robot linear cutting stapler (SureForm) may reduce the incidence of postoperative anastomotic complications due to the technical advantages,therefore,the aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of robotic linear cutting stapler SureForm and laparoscopic linear cutting stapler on the incidence of anastomotic complications after robotic rectal cancer anus preserving surgery.

NCT ID: NCT05662735 Not yet recruiting - Surgery Clinical Trials

Laparoscopic Primary Diaphragm Versus Mesh Repair for Hiatus Hernia: a Long-Term Follow-Up

PRIME LTFU
Start date: March 2023
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Assessment of the recurrence of hiatal hernia five to ten years after repair using sutures versus sutures reinforced with non-absorbable mesh.

NCT ID: NCT05445024 Recruiting - Laparoscopic Clinical Trials

Combination of Nalbuphine and Dexmedetomidine Versus Sufentanil and Dexmedetomidine on Patients

Start date: January 1, 2023
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Surgical pain refers to pain that occurs immediately after surgery, including physical pain and visceral pain. Thus, it severely challenges the proper use of analgesics for patients undergoing laparoscope gastrointestinal surgery to clinicians. Nalbuphine is a mixed agonist-antagonist opioid. The investigators hypothesized that the clinical effect of nalbuphine in combination with dexmedetomidine might be different from that of sufentanil in combination with dexmedetomidine. So, the investigators performed a nalbuphine and dexmedetomidine dose finding study, for the patient controlled anaesthesia (PCA) after the laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery, to establish their 95% effective dose (ED95). The investigators then compared the clinical effect and adverse events of the newly established dosing regimen of nalbuphine combined with dexmedetomidine, to the equivalent dosing of sufentanil combined with dexmedetomidine, in the same patient population.

NCT ID: NCT05427266 Not yet recruiting - Pain Clinical Trials

Laparoscopic Transversus Abdominis Plane Block (LTAP) for Appendicectomy Versus Standard Port Site Treatment

TapBlock
Start date: July 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study aims to compare Laparoscopic assisted LTAP (Transversus Abdominis Plane) to standard port-site infiltration in terms of post-operative visual analogue scores (VAS) for pain at 3, 6, 12 and 24 hours following laparoscopic appendicectomy Tap Block is a standard conventional analgesia protocol for laparoscopic appendicitis used in Beaumont Hospital, and other hospitals throughout Ireland. The medicinal product for both groups is the same - Bupivacaine. The mode of administration is what this study is reviewing: Control group (Standard port site infiltration) and Study Group - Laparoscopic Transversus Abdominis Plane Block

NCT ID: NCT05416866 Not yet recruiting - Analgesia Clinical Trials

Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Plus Quadratus Lumborum Block or Retrolaminar Block of Multiple Injections for Postoperative Analgesia Following Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery

Start date: June 20, 2022
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Our hypothesis was that transversus abdominis plane block plus retrolaminar block would reduce postoperative sufentanil consumption and provide superior analgesia compared with transversus abdominis plane block plus quadratus lumborum block for laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

NCT ID: NCT05259488 Completed - Gastric Cancer Clinical Trials

Preoperative Immunonutrition in Laparoscopic Total D2 Gastrectomy

Start date: January 1, 2014
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Immunonutrition (IN) appears to reduce infective complications and in-hospital length of stay (LOS) after gastrointestinal surgery. More specifically, it seems to be beneficial also in gastric cancer surgery. Potential benefits of combining preoperative IN (PIN) with protocols of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in reducing LOS in laparoscopic total gastrectomy are yet to be determined.

NCT ID: NCT04852016 Completed - Cholecystectomy Clinical Trials

Optimizing the Consent Process for Emergent Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Start date: September 21, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The Canadian Medical Protective Association (CMPA) defines informed consent (IC) as a voluntary process where important elements include details of the procedure, complications, and proposed alternatives. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) was the most common laparoscopic procedure cited in 423 medical-legal cases reported by CMPA in 2017, with 29% of cases citing issues in pre-operative care including inadequacy of the consent process. The investigators recently demonstrated that technology can help improve the IC process in an outpatient setting by conducting a prospective randomized controlled trial to examine the effects of adding a digital educational platform (DEP) module to a standard verbal consent (SVC) for an elective laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedure. The investigators demonstrated a significant improvement in immediate post-consent knowledge of the risks, benefits and alternatives in patients who viewed the DEP module with equivalent patient satisfaction as compared to a SVC. With the proposed study the investigators plan to gather evidence to support implementing a digital education platform for emergent surgical procedures performed in an in-patient setting. The investigators propose to conduct a randomized controlled trial to explore the benefits of adding a DEP module to a SVC for patients presenting with acute cholecystitis requiring an emergent LC as an in-patient. Participants will be randomly allocated (1:1) to either a control group (SVC) or an intervention group (SVC + DEP). Primary outcome of interest will be immediate post-consent knowledge of the risks, benefits, alternatives and expected outcomes for a LC. Secondary outcomes will include satisfaction with the consent discussion and delayed retention of knowledge of the risks, benefits, alternatives and expected outcomes for a LC . The investigators hypothesize that completion of the DEP module in addition to SVC will result in superior immediate and delayed post-consent knowledge of risks and benefits of LC with equivalent patients satisfaction as compared to SVC alone. The results of this study will provide evidence supporting the addition of DEP to SVC for urgent and emergent surgical procedures.