View clinical trials related to Knee Arthritis.
Filter by:The objective of this investigation is to evaluate the safety of the geniculate artery embolization (GAE) procedure with HydroPearl® Microspheres in 30 patients with knee pain caused by osteoarthritis with 24 months follow-up. The GAE procedure is an arterial embolization procedure that blocks abnormal blood vessels caused be knee arthritis in order to evaluate the effect on knee pain.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of pulsed radiofrequency of the saphenous nerve in the treatment of pain due to knee osteoarthritis (OA). The investigators will conduct real pulsed radiofrequency or sham, over the saphenous nerve during 4 separate sessions. The investigators will evaluate pain intensity, quality of life, function, and disability via clinical validated scales. The research question is whether pulsed radiofrequency can lessen knee pain and improve function and quality of life in patients with chronic knee pain due OA. It is hypothesized, that less knee pain and improved function, and quality of life after the pulsed radiofrequency sessions.
The choice between ultra-congruent (UC) insert or posterior cruciate ligament-stabilized (PS) insert in posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) sacrificing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains debatable. Despite the potential advantages of the UC insert over PS insert with its different design, there are concerns about inferior clinical outcome related to its use. Therefore, isokinetic performance was used in this study to objectively evaluate knee function after TKA and the clinical scores of the patients were also evaluated. To the best of our knowledge, no prospective randomized study has compared the isokinetic performance of the knee following the use of UC and PS inserts in TKA. The hypothesis of the present study was that compared with the PS insert, the UC insert would be associated with a lower clinical outcome and isokinetic performance following TKA. A total of 65 patients scheduled to undergo TKA on for primary knee osteoarthritis were randomly assigned to either the UC (32 patients) or the PS group (33 patients). The Knee Society Score (KSS) and isokinetic performance results of each patient were recorded preoperatively and at postoperative 3, 6 and 12 months. The physiatrist performing isokinetic tests and patients were blinded to the study.
There are concerns that total infrapatellar fat pad (IPFP) excision in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) results in patellar tendon shortening due to ischemic contracture. But, individual preference of the surgeon is still the main determinant between total or partial excision. The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to compare knee society score (KSS), knee extension and flexion peak torque in patients undergoing TKA with total IPFP excision or partial IPFP excision. The hypothesis of the study is that during TKA, total IPFP excision would lead to worse isokinetic performance and clinical outcome. A total of 72 patients scheduled to undergo TKA for primary osteoarthritis of the knee by a single surgeon were randomly assigned to either the total or partial excision group. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and at postoperative 1 year, with Knee Society Score (KSS) and isokinetic measurements. Physiatrist doing isokinetic tests and patients were blinded to the study.
The Investigators would like to compare multiradius and single-radius total knee arthroplasty using with association between sagittal patellar offset and anterior knee pain in subjects having undergone bilateral total knee replacement.
The aim of this study to evaluate whether the position of the sagittal patellar offset is a predictive factor for anterior knee pain in subjects having undergone bilateral multiradius total knee replacement.
This is a prospective, randomized, controlled study. The purpose of this study is to assess functional and clinical changes among patients with symptomatic knee OA treated with intra-articular injections of autologous adipose tissue or PRP and to compare the efficacy of both therapeutic methods. We hypothesize that adipose tissue injections will improve patients' quality of life and functional status and will decrease pain level significantly more than PRP injections. In addition to the functional tests and muscle strength measurement, the patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) of the knee joint function and quality of life will be used to assess each participant. The same inclusion criteria have been established for an Experimental Group (subjects treated with autologous fat tissue) and a Control Group (subjects treated with PRP). Those criteria consist of: symptomatic knee OA, age between 45 and 65 y.o., Kellgren- Lawrence grades I - III OA, no or minimal positive effects of previous conservative treatment (rehabilitation, hyaluronic acid injections, steroid injections). Those patients who meet inclusion criteria will be allocated to Fat Tissue Group or PRP Group randomly. Patients will be assessed five times: before treatment and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the treatment. The PROMs consist of the four questionnaires: The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), International Knee Documentation Committee 2000 (IKDC 2000), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) (21,22), the Health Questionnaire EQ- 5D- 5L. Moreover, three functional tests will be performed to assess patient's functional status: The Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), The 5 Times Sit to Stand Test (5xSTS), The 10m Walk Test (10mWT). To assess strength parameters of the knee flexors and extensors the Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction (MVIC) will be measured. Each test will be supervised by the same one physiotherapist to avoid any interexaminer bias and discrepancies during testing.
This is a randomized control trial to determine if there is a measurable change in voluntary quadriceps activation, RTD, pain, and function before and after a single session of manual physical therapy. The researchers will utilize a sample of convenience with consecutive sampling at the Brooke Army Medical Center physical therapy clinic for patients referred for knee osteoarthritis. As is standard of care, patients will be provided a medical intake form and a clinical outcome measure commensurate with their primary anatomic region for which they are seeking physical therapy (i.e.: Lower Extremity Functional Scale for hip, knee, or ankle pain). If patients choose to partake in the study, they will complete the consent form and the initial physical therapy evaluation will be conducted. They will then be provided an appointment for data collection at the Army-Baylor Center for Rehabilitation Research biomechanics lab at the Army Medical Department Center and School. The treatment group will receive one 30-minute session of orthopedic manual physical therapy targeting the knee joint and soft tissues with complementary exercises targeted at their impairment. The control group will receive a 30-minute class on knee OA diagnosis, prognosis, various treatment options, and will conclude with a question and answer with the researcher. Both groups will receive their intervention from a board-certified physical therapist in the Army-Baylor Orthopedic Manual Therapy Fellowship program. At the conclusion of formal testing, the patient will be provided standard physical therapy care as deemed appropriate by their evaluating physical therapist. Thus, all subjects, regardless of their assigned group, will receive the same standard of care for their knee pain.
This study compares and evaluates differences in movement analysis, patient-reported outcome and radiological assesment between patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty with use of either Zimmer Biomet NexGen and Zimmer Biomet PERSONA
The purpose of this study is to evaluate performance of two modern total knee arthroplasty designs using patient reported outcomes and force exhibited during various activities of daily living.