Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05379894
Other study ID # Kidney stones , PNL
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date June 1, 2022
Est. completion date June 1, 2026

Study information

Verified date May 2022
Source Assiut University
Contact Yasser Abdel salam
Phone 01064108877
Email ymabdelsalam@aun.edu.eg
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

perform a comparative randomized trial comparing the efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the prone and modified supine positions in management of complex renal stones


Description:

since the first successful removal of a renal calculus via a nephrostomy tract in 1976, percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has become the preferred method of treating patients with large or complex stones.1 Traditionally, PCNL has been performed in the prone position, which allows a wide field for kidney puncture, avoids abdominal visceral injuries, and makes the puncture pathway short and straight. Multiple routes of access and the interoperative use of C-arm fluoroscopy X-ray machines may contribute to the vertical positioning of the puncture. This position provides posterior access to the collecting system, which theoretically enables the surgeon to puncture a posterior calyx through Braudel's avascular renal plane without significant parenchymal bleeding and peritoneal perforation. However, the prone position also has some disadvantages. For example, abdominal pressure decreases end expiratory lung volume and lung capacity, reducing the ability of patients to tolerate prolonged surgery, contraindicating the prone position in morbidly obese patients and individuals with some respiratory diseases. An alternative position for PCNL consists of the modified supine position, in which patients are placed in a supine position with a water bag or specially designed cushion under the flank. The modified supine position has several advantages. Due to greater comfort, the position has a low impact on a patient's blood circulation and respiratory system. This position makes it easier for the anesthetist to monitor the patient, and it may decrease the use of anesthetics. For high-risk patients, the modified supine position can be changed to facilitate endotracheal intubation anesthesia whenever needed. Moreover, the smaller angle between the horizon and the operating channel improves the removal of crushed stones. This position also facilitates simultaneous ureteroscopy access when necessary, allowing for the combination of PCNL and the ureteroscopy in the management of complex stone diseases. The major disadvantage of the modified supine position is that the kidney is more easily pushed forward by the puncture needle and the fascial dilators, leading to the establishment of a deeper channel. It remains unclear whether the traditional prone position or the modified supine position is optimal for PCNL. The prone position has been associated with reduced operation times and higher stone clearance rates, whereas the supine position has been associated with greater safety. The Valdivia position improved by Galdakao enables the use of flexible ureteroscopy and an ureteroscopy to treat ureteral and kidney stones at the same time, whereas the Valdivia position improved by Barts often requires X-rays combined with ultrasound for determining the puncture site, and the puncture route is longer. the investigators did not utilize the Galdakao improvement of the Valdivia position since flexible ureteroscopy was too expensive for routine use. Therefore, the investigators compared the efficacy and safety of PCNL in the traditional prone and modified supine positions.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 200
Est. completion date June 1, 2026
Est. primary completion date June 1, 2025
Accepts healthy volunteers
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 70 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Inclusion criteria: - Grade II - A solitary stone in the upper pole with simple anatomy or multiple stones in a patient with simple anatomy or any solitary stone in a patient with abnormal anatomy - Grade III - Multiple stones in a patient with abnormal anatomy or, stones in a calyceal diverticulum or partial staghorn calculus - Grade IV - Staghorn calculus or any stone in a patient with spina bifida or spinal injury. Exclusion Criteria: - ยท Pediatric group - Grade I - A solitary stone in the mid/lower pole with simple anatomy or a solitary stone in the pelvis with simple anatomy

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy
Extraction of kidney stones through skin using nephroscope

Locations

Country Name City State
Egypt Assuit facility of medicine Assiut Assuit

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Assiut University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Egypt, 

References & Publications (2)

Gökce MI, Ibis A, Sanci A, Akinci A, Bagci U, Agaoglu EA, Süer E, Gülpinar Ö. Comparison of supine and prone positions for percutaneous nephrolithotomy in treatment of staghorn stones. Urolithiasis. 2017 Dec;45(6):603-608. doi: 10.1007/s00240-017-0977-y. — View Citation

McCahy P, Rzetelski-West K, Gleeson J. Complete stone clearance using a modified supine position: initial experience and comparison with prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2013 Jun;27(6):705-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0650. Epub 2013 Mar 18. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary comparing the efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the prone and modified supine position number of participants completely stone-free 4 years
Primary comparing the efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the prone and modified supine position measure amount of blood loss 4 years
Primary comparing the efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the prone and modified supine position measure of Time of operation 4 years
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT04495699 - Asymptomatic Renal Calculi in Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections
Recruiting NCT04559321 - Holmium Vs Trilogy Kidney Stones GUY's 1-2 Phase 3
Completed NCT04332861 - Evaluation of Infection in Obstructing Urolithiasis
Withdrawn NCT06138327 - A Study of BMN 255 in Participants With Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease And Hyperoxaluria Phase 1
Not yet recruiting NCT05022537 - Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Following Retrograde Percutaneous Nephrostomy Access Using Novel Device in Comparison to Antegrade Access N/A
Completed NCT03872843 - Opioid Free Management After Ureteroscopy Phase 4
Recruiting NCT06412822 - Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NET's) in Prevalent Kidney Stone
Active, not recruiting NCT06437379 - Infection Control Measures for Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy N/A
Recruiting NCT04997668 - Clinical Outcomes and Healthcare Economics of SOLTIVE Compared to Ho:YAG Laser in Urolithiasis N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04333745 - Influence of Obesity on Oxalate Metabolism and Handling in Calcium Oxalate Stone Formers N/A
Recruiting NCT05701098 - SOUND Pivotal Trial - (Sonomotion stOne comminUtion resoNance ultrasounD) N/A
Recruiting NCT04389853 - Mini-PNCL vs fURS in Management of Nephrolithiasis N/A
Recruiting NCT05334979 - Oxalate and Citrate N/A
Recruiting NCT05591716 - Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Unimodal Bilateral Flexible Ureteroscopy. N/A
Recruiting NCT06209931 - RIRS With Tip Flexible Pressure-controlling Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini PCNLfor Kidney Stones
Withdrawn NCT04545528 - The Impact of Nutritional Service in the Stone Clinic on the Patient Urine Collection Results
Completed NCT05714423 - Outcomes in Lower Pole Kidney Stone Management Using Mini-PCNL Compared With Retrograde Intra Renal Surgery N/A
Recruiting NCT03281928 - Effect of Dietary Sodium and Potassium Citrate on Renal Mineral Handling N/A
Recruiting NCT04835922 - Comparison of Efficacy of Intercostal Nerve Block vs Peritract Infiltration With 0.25% Bupivacaine in PCNL N/A
Recruiting NCT03257306 - Magnetic Ureteral Stent Symptoms - a Comparison to Standard Ureteral Stent as Perceived By the Patient (MAGUSS) N/A