Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

The specific aim of this study is to validate our hypothesis that the magnetic ureteral stents have the same amount of adverse effects as the more commonly used non-magnetic ureteral stents. If this hypothesis would be confirmed then the usage of magnetic ureteral stents would be justified for both reducing patient discomfort by way of fewer cystoscopies and possibly also decreasing the overall expenditures of treatment.


Clinical Trial Description

Many urological procedures involving the kidney and the ureters require a stent replacement to avoid un-wanted adverse invents caused by the procedure itself. The stenting, however, predisposes the patient to adverse effects of its own and the application and removal of the stent is a notable monetary expense. The use of magnetic ureteral stents that can be removed via catheter instead of requiring an additional cystoscopy for removal would reduce the discomfort to patients and also possibly decrease the expenditures of the overall treatment. However, the comparability of standard ureteral stents and the magnetic ureteral stents is largely unknown due to there being no published research on the subject as of this time. The specific aim of this study is to validate our hypothesis that the magnetic ureteral stents have the same amount of adverse effects as the more commonly used non-magnetic ureteral stents. The design is as prospective randomized, single-blinded, multi-institutional, non-inferiority study conducted in Hospital Districts of Southwest Finland, Päijät-Häme, Pohjois-Savo, Satakunta and Keski-Suomi. Using age and gender stratification, patients are randomised 1:1 fashion into having a magnetic (n=85) or standard ureter stent (n=85). The primary objectives are the mean differences between the two groups in pain and urinary symptoms scores determined by the Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ) 4 weeks after stent placement. The patients will be recruited starting from the 4rd quarter of 2018 and ending during the 3rd quarter of 2020. Preliminary analysis of all results will be available in September 2020 and reports are expected to be written during December 2020. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT03257306
Study type Interventional
Source Turku University Hospital
Contact Kari T Syvänen, MD, PhD
Phone +3582313000
Email kari.syvanen@tyks.fi
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
Start date November 9, 2018
Completion date December 2022

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT04495699 - Asymptomatic Renal Calculi in Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections
Recruiting NCT04559321 - Holmium Vs Trilogy Kidney Stones GUY's 1-2 Phase 3
Completed NCT04332861 - Evaluation of Infection in Obstructing Urolithiasis
Recruiting NCT06138327 - A Study of BMN 255 in Participants With Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease And Hyperoxaluria Phase 1
Completed NCT03872843 - Opioid Free Management After Ureteroscopy Phase 4
Recruiting NCT04997668 - Clinical Outcomes and Healthcare Economics of SOLTIVE Compared to Ho:YAG Laser in Urolithiasis N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04333745 - Influence of Obesity on Oxalate Metabolism and Handling in Calcium Oxalate Stone Formers N/A
Recruiting NCT05701098 - SOUND Pivotal Trial - (Sonomotion stOne comminUtion resoNance ultrasounD) N/A
Recruiting NCT04389853 - Mini-PNCL vs fURS in Management of Nephrolithiasis N/A
Recruiting NCT05334979 - Oxalate and Citrate N/A
Recruiting NCT05591716 - Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Unimodal Bilateral Flexible Ureteroscopy. N/A
Recruiting NCT06209931 - RIRS With Tip Flexible Pressure-controlling Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini PCNLfor Kidney Stones
Withdrawn NCT04545528 - The Impact of Nutritional Service in the Stone Clinic on the Patient Urine Collection Results
Completed NCT05714423 - Outcomes in Lower Pole Kidney Stone Management Using Mini-PCNL Compared With Retrograde Intra Renal Surgery N/A
Recruiting NCT03281928 - Effect of Dietary Sodium and Potassium Citrate on Renal Mineral Handling N/A
Recruiting NCT04835922 - Comparison of Efficacy of Intercostal Nerve Block vs Peritract Infiltration With 0.25% Bupivacaine in PCNL N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05504512 - Percutaneous Nephroscopic Treatment of Parapelvic Cysts
Recruiting NCT06306222 - Thulium Fiber Laser vs. Holmium:YAG Laser for the Ureteroscopic Treatment of Patients With Urinary Stone Disease N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04606758 - Fluoroscopic Guided vs US-guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy for the Treatment of Stone Disease N/A
Withdrawn NCT01980004 - Potassium Citrate Supplementation vs. Dietary Counseling Phase 2