Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the preferred treatment for renal stones >2 cm or resistant to ESWL. Postoperative pain following this invasive surgery adds to the morbidity of patient which requires additional analgesia and can affect the quality of care. To lower the morbidity of PCNL, proper and adequate management of postoperative pain remains an integral component of PCNL. There are many ways to reduce the postoperative pain following PCNL including mini PCNL, tubeless PCNL, use of regional analgesia etc. However the modality of analgesic technique is still a matter of debate. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of intercostal nerve block compared with peritract infiltration in patient undergoing PCNL. Specifically, the study will look on to the demography of patients undergoing PCNL and their indications. The study will also compare the intensity of pain in two groups using visual analogue scale (VAS). The study will be a prospective double blinded randomized clinical trial done at Department of Urology and Kidney Transplant Surgery, Tribhuvan University Teaching hospital (TUTH). The time frame of this study will be of 1 year or when sample size is fulfilled including all the patients who visit the hospital for PCNL and fulfils the inclusion criteria. At the end of our study we expect to conclude that the use of intercostal nerve block is superior or inferior than or equal to peritract infiltration in alleviating the postoperative pain following PCNL.


Clinical Trial Description

Introduction: The incidence and prevalence of renal calculi have increased globally across all ages, sex, and race, probably due to change in dietary habits and global warming. PCNL is considered 'gold standard' for the management of large renal calculi because it is less invasive and morbid than the open surgery. Currently, the indications for PCNL include large size renal calculi (>1.5-2 cm), staghorn calculi, upper tract calculi not responding to other modalities of treatment, lower pole stones, cystine nephrolithiasis, and stones in anatomically abnormal kidneys. However, the procedure causes postoperative pain, mostly due to dilatation of the renal capsule, the parenchyma and pain along the tract of the nephrostomy tube. So the postoperative pain remains an integral part of management. Postoperative pain management not only reduces patient suffering but also improve patient satisfaction, reduces morbidity and in parallel enhances recovery, improves rehabilitation, reduces hospital stay and thereby overall hospital cost. The postoperative pain due to the procedure may vary with individual pain perception, use of percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) tubes, comorbid conditions, choice of analgesic route, anesthetic agents and postoperative course. Small calibers of tubes, even mini PCNL or tubeless PCNL and regional analgesia such as intercostal nerve block, peritract infiltration, paravertebral block etc. could further decrease postoperative pain and analgesic requirement and hence improving postoperative patient comfort. However, studies on these techniques have produced conflicting results due to the use of different local anesthetics, various regional techniques, and different study designs. So this study aims to compare the efficacy of intercostal nerve block and peritract infiltration with 0.25% bupivacaine in alleviating postoperative pain following the procedure with the subjective assessment of pain Rational/justification : • The optimal method of pain control after percutaneous nephrolithotomy remains controversial till now. We need better technique of analgesia to decrease the pain following PCNL. - Intercostal nerve block and peritract infiltration are common regional analgesic methods used by most of the investigators that had shown to be adequate for postoperative pain control. - This study may be helpful in providing evidence for a clinical guideline to manage postoperative pain that will eventually help to decrease the morbidity and bring better outcome. General Objective : To compare the efficacy of intercostal nerve block and peritract infiltration with 0.25% bupivacaine in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Specific Objective : - To analyse the demography of the patient [age, sex, BMI, stone size and laterality, renal function test, stone burden (size, Guy's Stone score etc.)] undergoing PCNL. - To compare the intensity of pain using visual analogue score, resting and dynamic VAS scores, following PCNL between two groups (ICNB and PTI). - To compare the time to first rescue analgesia and total analgesic requirement between both groups. - To document the complications of both groups. Research Hypothesis Is Intercostal nerve block more efficacious than peritract infiltration following PCNL in alleviating pain? Study Variables - Independent Variables: Age, Sex, BMI, stone location, laterality and size, Guys Stone score (burden), ASA grade, comorbidity, Group I (ICBN), Group P (PTI) nephrostomy tract size (mini vs standard), no of Tracts (single vs multiple), use to tube (tube vs tubeless), length of hospital stay, stone clearance, complications - Dependent Variables R-VAS score, D-VAS score, Time to first analgesic demand, Total analgesic requirement ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT04835922
Study type Interventional
Source Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute Of Medicine.
Contact Sushil Gyawali, MS Resident
Phone +9779849742715
Email drsushilgyawali@gmail.com
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
Start date November 9, 2020
Completion date November 12, 2021

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT04495699 - Asymptomatic Renal Calculi in Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections
Recruiting NCT04559321 - Holmium Vs Trilogy Kidney Stones GUY's 1-2 Phase 3
Completed NCT04332861 - Evaluation of Infection in Obstructing Urolithiasis
Recruiting NCT06138327 - A Study of BMN 255 in Participants With Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease And Hyperoxaluria Phase 1
Completed NCT03872843 - Opioid Free Management After Ureteroscopy Phase 4
Recruiting NCT04997668 - Clinical Outcomes and Healthcare Economics of SOLTIVE Compared to Ho:YAG Laser in Urolithiasis N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04333745 - Influence of Obesity on Oxalate Metabolism and Handling in Calcium Oxalate Stone Formers N/A
Recruiting NCT05701098 - SOUND Pivotal Trial - (Sonomotion stOne comminUtion resoNance ultrasounD) N/A
Recruiting NCT04389853 - Mini-PNCL vs fURS in Management of Nephrolithiasis N/A
Recruiting NCT05334979 - Oxalate and Citrate N/A
Recruiting NCT05591716 - Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Unimodal Bilateral Flexible Ureteroscopy. N/A
Recruiting NCT06209931 - RIRS With Tip Flexible Pressure-controlling Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini PCNLfor Kidney Stones
Withdrawn NCT04545528 - The Impact of Nutritional Service in the Stone Clinic on the Patient Urine Collection Results
Completed NCT05714423 - Outcomes in Lower Pole Kidney Stone Management Using Mini-PCNL Compared With Retrograde Intra Renal Surgery N/A
Recruiting NCT03281928 - Effect of Dietary Sodium and Potassium Citrate on Renal Mineral Handling N/A
Recruiting NCT03257306 - Magnetic Ureteral Stent Symptoms - a Comparison to Standard Ureteral Stent as Perceived By the Patient (MAGUSS) N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05504512 - Percutaneous Nephroscopic Treatment of Parapelvic Cysts
Recruiting NCT06306222 - Thulium Fiber Laser vs. Holmium:YAG Laser for the Ureteroscopic Treatment of Patients With Urinary Stone Disease N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04606758 - Fluoroscopic Guided vs US-guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy for the Treatment of Stone Disease N/A
Withdrawn NCT01980004 - Potassium Citrate Supplementation vs. Dietary Counseling Phase 2