View clinical trials related to Kidney Calculi.
Filter by:Large renal pelvic stones are frequently managed with percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) but laparoscopic pyelolithotomy (LPL) can be an alternative procedure when performed by skilled surgeons to achieve excellent outcomes in terms of stone free status, operative time, postoperative kidney function, hospitalization duration, and complications. there are two methods for LPL surgery : Transperitoneal (TLP) and Retroperitoneal (RLP). RLP associated with shorter mean time for oral intake, and mean hospital stay after surgery. The surgical exposure in the transperitoneal route for LP is familiar to the majority of surgeons. Also, a much larger working space is available and there are various established anatomical landmarks for performing the surgery effectively. This study introduces a modified technique that creates application of posterior pyelotomy in TLP to achieve the advantages of RLP
This research aims to study the effectiveness of silodosin in the management of lower ureter stones larger than 6 mm in diameter in terms of affected ureter (right or left), the size of the stone, the degree of hydronephrosis, the rate of stone expulsion(day), whether the stone was completely expelled or not, and the side effects of silodosin.
Rcompare high-energy versus low-energy laser settings in renal stone lithotripsy using low power machines) Holmium YAG 30 watts, examining their respective advantages, limitations, and overall efficacy.
Many things, like not drinking enough fluids, contribute to making kidney stones and there is also a genetic tendency. We looked into this in 1998-2000 in 14 families with several stone-formers. In four of these the risk for stones was passed down through one line of the family. We have now had a close look at the DNA of 47 members of these four families using a very sensitive technique called exome sequencing. We wanted to see if these individuals had inherited any rare changes (variations) in their DNA which would add to their risk of making stones. We found 11 variations which might be important. Surprisingly, these were not in genes which have been regarded as the main causes of stones. Most of them are unfamiliar to clinicians and scientists world-wide. Experts on the genes gave us helpful advice about the likely significance of the variations. Researchers in Paris, Lille and the UK (Oxford, Cambridge and Sheffield) did analyses to help to decide this. An exciting finding was that one of the variants, not previously identified in stone formers, had just been found in a large Italian family with stones. This small study has shown that: variations in a wide range of genes may contribute to stone formation; these occur in genes that we have not come across before; further laboratory studies are essential to investigate potentially important variants; sharing findings between laboratories doing similar studies world-wide is crucial.
This prospective randomized comparative study was done at Helwan University Hospital. It was conducted on 120 patients with unilateral pelvic renal stones from 1.5 to 3 cm in largest diameter who was admitted through duration to compare the two procedures differences in terms of complications, analgesic use, hospital stay, operational time, and stone-free rates.
There is a global increase in the prevalence of urolithiasis in children attributed to lifestyle changes, dietary habits, climate changes, childhood obesity, and the wider availability of ultrasonography. The rising incidence of the disease with its recurrent nature emphasizes the need for minimally invasive therapeutic options. Patients in whom RIRS has been performed in the last four years with increasing experience will be presented, and complications, stone-free rates, and technical details will be discussed. This retrospective Cohort study included children who underwent RIRS. Medical history, serum electrolytes, midstream urine culture, urinalysis, serum creatinine, complete blood count, and coagulation assessments were performed preoperatively. Ultrasonography (USG) was performed three months, 6 months, and 1 year after the procedures to evaluate stone recurrence and hydronephrosis. The investigators analyzed the stone-free rate ,complications, and the conversion to open procedure
Double J stent (ureteral stent) can cause discomfort to patients, generally due to irritation of the bladder mucosa, especially in the trigone area, smooth muscle spasm, and reflux of urine into the ureter. Complaints often appear in patients, especially lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), pain in the waist when urinating due to reflux of urine, sexual dysfunction, and hematuria. Currently, to assess complaints after ureteral stent placement, the Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire instrument consists of 6 topics: urinary complaints, pain, general health, work, sexual problems, and other things. Interleukin-6 is an important inflammatory cytokine when irritation occurs after ureteral stent placement. Interleukin 10 is a cytokine with potent anti-inflammatory properties that plays a central role in limiting the host's immune response to pathogens, thereby preventing host damage and maintaining normal tissue homeostasis. The profile of these biomarkers has the potential to determine the correct prognosis and therapy. Mirabegron is a β3 adrenergic receptor agonist that has a dual antioxidant effect that plays a key role in the first step of the antimicrobial response and early resolution of inflammation so that post-stent complaints similar to overactive bladder complaints can be resolved. Tamsulosin (a selective α1A- and α1D-adrenoceptor antagonist) has a relaxing effect on the smooth muscle in the prostate, the neck of the bladder, and the distal ureter, thereby reducing the inflammatory reaction and improving oxidative stress by reducing the formation of reactive oxidative stress.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the flexible ureteroscope (FURS) technique with and without ureteral access sheath (UAS).
The study has been conducted in Urology department at Kafrelsheikh University Hospital between March 2022 to March 2023. informed consent was taken from eligible patients and were randomized into three groups, Group A :Flexible ureteroscope (F-URS) group underwent holmium laser lithotripsy using flexible ureteroscopy (Boston® scientific (lithovue) while, Group B : extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) group underwent electromagnetic extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (STORZ® MEDICAL Modulith SLX-F2 FD21, Germany) .Group C : Mini perc group underwent holmium laser lithotripsy using Karl® Storz MIP set.
The goal of this [ type of study:]prospective randomized clinical trial. The main question is to compare the outcomes of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (m-PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in treating upper urinary tract calculus in children ≤ 10 years.