Corneal Collagen Crosslinking for Progressive Keratoconus and Ectasia Using Riboflavin/Dextran and Hypotonic Riboflavin

Keratoconus Clinical Trial

Official title:

Corneal Collagen Crosslinking for Progressive Keratoconus and Ectasia Using Riboflavin/Dextran and Hypotonic Riboflavin

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Active, not recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT01152541
• Other study ID #: HYPO-CXL-001
• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Phase: Phase 3
• Start date: June 2010
• Est. completion date: December 2025

Study information

• Verified date: February 2023
• Source: Cornea and Laser Eye Institute
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) has been proposed as an effective method of reducing progression of both keratoconus and corneal ectasia after surgery, as well as possibly decreasing the steepness of the cornea in these pathologies. During the CXL procedure, the central corneal thickness has been shown to significantly change. The investigator's believe that better maintenance of corneal thickness potentially could have benefits of better reproducibility of the crosslinking effect with improved predictability of results.

Description:

The objective of this study is to investigate the difference between the two riboflavin preparations during UV (ultraviolet) administration. Both riboflavin preparations currently are in general use worldwide and in U.S. clinical trials of corneal collagen crosslinking. The first preparation contains riboflavin in a dextran solution, which may tend to dehydrate the cornea and keep it thinner. The second preparation contains riboflavin in a solution without dextran; in this case, the relative hypotonicity may tend to keep the cornea better hydrated and thicker. The primary goal of the study is to see if the use of hypotonic riboflavin (rather than riboflavin with dextran) better maintains consistent corneal thickness during the CXL procedure. The second goal of the study is to determine if better maintenance of corneal thickness potentially could have benefits of better consistency of the procedure, decrease in corneal haze formation, and improved safety of the endothelial cells. Safety and efficacy outcomes will then be compared between the groups. In particular, we will compare the corneal thickness measured by ultrasonic pachymetry immediately after the CXL procedure in the randomized eyes. Secondary outcomes will include visual acuity, longer term corneal thickness changes, and corneal steepness changes. Safety assessments will include a tabulation of adverse events, patient symptoms, loss of visual acuity, changes in endothelial cell density, slit lamp examination of the cornea and lens, and contact lens tolerance for contact lens wearers

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Enrollment: 160
• Est. completion date: December 2025
• Est. primary completion date: December 2024
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• 18 years of age or older
• A diagnosis of progressive keratoconus over a period of 24 months or less before randomization or a diagnosis of corneal ectasia after corneal refractive surgery
• Vision with contact lenses or glasses is worse than 20/20
• Corneal thickness greater than 300 microns at the thinnest point

Exclusion Criteria:

• Eyes classified as either normal, atypical normal, or keratoconus suspect on the severity grading scheme.
• Corneal pachymetry = 300 microns at the thinnest point measured by Pentacam in the eye(s) to be treated.
• Previous ocular condition (other than refractive error) in the eye(s) to be treated that may predispose the eye for future complications
• Clinically significant corneal scarring in the CXL treatment zone
• Pregnancy (including plan to become pregnant) or lactation during the course of the study
• A known sensitivity to study medications
• Patients with nystagmus or any other condition that would prevent a steady gaze during the CXL treatment or other diagnostic tests.
• Patients with a current condition that, in the investigator's opinion, would interfere with or prolong epithelial healing.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Corneal Ectasia
• Keratoconus

Intervention

Drug:
• Riboflavin/Dextran
Administration of riboflavin/dextran every 2 minutes for the duration of UV exposure
• Hypotonic Riboflavin
Administration of hypotonic riboflavin every 2 minutes for the duration of UV exposure.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	Cornea and Laser Eye Institute	Teaneck	New Jersey

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Cornea and Laser Eye Institute

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Corneal thickness	Changes in central pachymetry (as measured by ultrasound) measured intraoperatively will be compared to a baseline preoperative value. Thickness will also be assessed at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively.	Intraoperatively
Secondary	Maximum Keratometry	The change in maximum keratometry (Kmax) from baseline will be evaluated at 12 months for all eyes randomized to (Group 1 - administration of Riboflavin/dextran for the duration of UV exposure.) and (Group 2 - Administration of hypotonic riboflavin for the duration of UV exposure) groups. As a secondary analysis of this endpoint, the change in maximum keratometry (Kmax) from baseline will be evaluated at 1, 3 and 6 month for all eyes	12 months
Secondary	Manifest Refraction	The change in manifest refraction spherical equivalent from baseline will be evaluated at 12 months. As a secondary analysis of this endpoint, a repeated measures analysis of variance will be conducted to assess the profile of the treatments across time at 1 month for the treatment groups as well as at 3, and 6 months to look at the effect of CXL timing on this variable.	12 months
Secondary	Visual Acuity	Change in BSCVA (best spectacle corrected visual acuity) and UCVA (uncorrected visual acuity) compared to the baseline examination will be evaluated at 12 months postoperatively. As a secondary analysis of this endpoint will be conducted to assess the profile of the treatments across time at 1 month and again at 3, and 6 months following the CXL procedure.	12 months
Secondary	Endothelial Cell Density	Endothelial cell count will be obtained using specular microscopy (Konan Medical) prior to CXL treatment and at 12 months postoperatively. Measurements will also be taken 3 months postoperatively and compared to baseline values.	12 months