View clinical trials related to Irritable Bowel Syndrome.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is study bowel symptoms, quality of life, and personal factors that may affect your health. In Aim 1 of this study participants will be invited to complete 6 survey-based questionnaires online. In Aim 2 of this study will monitor the effectiveness of a 12 week therapy program on bowel symptoms and overall quality of life.
Background: The combination of Lactobacillus fermentum and Lactobacillus delbrueckii (Lactobacillus LB) has proven to be effective and safe for the treatment of acute diarrhea in children. Also, a clinical trial in adult patients with chronic diarrhea, showed a reduction in the number of daily stools. However, the evidence is not enough regarding the efficacy and safety of Lactobacillus LB for treatment of patients with irritable bowel syndrome with predominance of diarrhea (IBS-D). Justification for this study: Lactobacillus LB could be a promising treatment for patients with IBS-D; nevertheless, the scientific evidence in this context is limited and it is not recent. Therefore, is necessary to explore the efficacy and safety of Lactobacillus LB in patients with IBS-D according to Rome IV criteria. Hypothesis: Lactobacillus LB is useful to decrease the frequency and improve the stools consistency of patients diagnosed with IBS-D by Rome IV criteria. Primary Outcome: To compare the treatment with Lactobacillus LB at two different doses: a) 20,000 million / day, vs. b) 10,000 million / day; and to determine if one of them is better than c) placebo, to decrease the frequency (weekly average of the number of stools/day) in patients diagnosed with IBS-D by Rome IV criteria. Design of the study: Clinical trial, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled. Keywords: irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea, Lactobacillus LB, treatment, efficacy, safety.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether olorinab is a safe and effective treatment for abdominal pain in participants with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS).
Background. Abdominal distention is produced by an abnormal somatic postural tone. We developed an original biofeedback technique based on electromyography-guided control of abdominothoracic muscular activity. In a randomized, placebo-controlled trial we demonstrated the superiority of biofeedback over placebo for the treatment of abdominal distention. However, the technique is technically complex and unpractical. Aim. To prove the efficacy of a simplified biofeedback technique for the treatment of abdominal distension. Selection criteria. Visible abdominal distension after meal ingestion; patients are able to identify the offending meal. Intervention. Patients will be randomized into biofeedback in placebo groups.Three sessions of either biofeedback or placebo intervention will be performed 30 min after ingestion of the offending meal during the first 3 weeks of the intervention period. Biofeedback: patients will be taught to control abdominal and thoracic muscular activity by providing a visual display of the abdominal and thoracic perimeter; specifically, they will be instructed to reduce the abdominal perimeter (girth); patients will be instructed to perform the same exercises before and after breakfast, lunch and dinner during the 4-week intervention period. Placebo: abdominal and thoracic perimeter will be recorded but not shown to the patient and a pill of placebo containing 0.5 g glucose will be administered; patients will be instructed to take a pill of placebo before breakfast, lunch and dinner during the 4-week intervention period. Primary Outcome Measure: Effect of the probe meal on the activity of thoraco-abdominal muscles (intercostals, external oblique, internal oblique, upper rectus, lower rectus) measured by electromyography before and after the probe meal. The response to the probe meal will be measured before and after treatment. Secondary Outcome Measures: - Effect of the probe meal on sensation of abdominal distension measured by 0-6 scales after the probe meal. - Changes in girth produced by the probe meal measured using a non-stretch belt placed over the umbilicus before and after the probe meal. - Sensation of abdominal distension measured by 0-6 scales after each meal (breakfast, lunch, dinner) over a 7-day clinical evaluation period before and during the 4th week of the intervention.
Randomized, double blind, controlled clinical trial, to evaluate safety and efficacy of L. reuteri DSM 17938 and L. reuteri ATCC PTA 6475 as adjuvant to reduce the severity of symptoms in adults with moderate to severe irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Primary outcome: Global clinical Improve assessed by the GSRS-IBS score. Adults 18-65 years, any gender, with ROME IV criteria for moderate to severe IBS and body max index <36 will be included. Prescreening will be run for 2 weeks, the intervention period will be 2/days for 14t weeks, follow by a 2 weeks period of observation with no intervention. Secondary outcomes include: a) Improvements in the stool patterns evaluated through Bristol Stool Form (BSF); b) Improvement of the quality of life (QoL) measured by Latin-American IBS-QoL questionnaire; c) Improvement of the depression and anxiety severity evaluated by the Goldberg Depression and Anxiety Scale; d) Frequency of rescue medication use and e) Frequency of Adverse Events (AEs)
The objective of LIN-MD-64 is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 12 weeks of linaclotide therapy (72 μg daily) in comparison with placebo in pediatric participants, 6 to 17 years of age, who fulfill modified Rome III Criteria for Child/Adolescent Functional Constipation (FC). The objective of LIN-MD-64 is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 12 weeks of linaclotide therapy (145 μg or 290 μg daily) in pediatric participants, 7 to 17 years of age, who fulfill the Rome III criteria for child/adolescent Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) and modified Rome III criteria for child/adolescent Functional Constipation (FC).
Abdominal pain is a central symptom of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS). IBD is an autoimmune disease characterized by inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract. IBS does not have clear biomarkers and is diagnosed based on symptom reports. The aim of this study is to explore biopsychosocial factors which may perpetuate and/or increase the severity of pain in these conditions. The main focus will be on the role of top-down brain processes in the experience of abdominal pain.
The aim of our study will be to establish in how many subjects with gastrointestinal symptoms and previous diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), the clinical picture is attributable to non celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS) or fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAPs) intolerance. For this purpose, all subjects with IBS will take a low FODMAPs diet, which implies the absence of cereals and consequently of gluten, and those presenting symptom improvement during this dietary treatment, will be exposed to a double-blind gluten or placebo challenge, to make a diagnosis of NCGS.
The gut microbiota is critical to health and functions with a level of complexity comparable to that of an organ system. Dysbiosis, or alterations of this gut microbiota ecology, have been implicated in a number of disease states. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), defined as infusion of feces from healthy donors to affected subjects, is a method to restore a balanced gut microbiota and has attracted great interest in recent years due to its efficacy and ease of use. FMT is now recommended as the most effective therapy for CDI not responding to standard therapies. Recent studies have suggested that dysbiosis is associated with a variety of disorders, and that FMT could be a useful treatment. Randomized controlled trial has been conducted in a number of disorders and shown positive results, including alcoholic hepatitis, Crohn's disease (CD), ulcerative colitis (UC), pouchitis, irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), hepatic encephalopathy and metabolic syndrome. Case series/reports and pilot studies has shown positive results in other disorders including Celiac disease, functional dyspepsia, constipation, metabolic syndrome such as diabetes mellitus, multidrug-resistant, hepatic encephalopathy, multiple sclerosis, pseudo-obstruction, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) or Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE) infection, radiation-induced toxicity, multiple organ dysfunction, dysbiotic bowel syndrome, MRSA enteritis, Pseudomembranous enteritis, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), and atopy. Despite FMT appears to be relatively safe and efficacious in treating a wide range of disease, its safety and efficacy in a usual clinical setting is unknown. More data is required to confirm safety and efficacy of FMT. Therefore, the investigators aim to conduct a pilot study to investigate the efficacy and safety of FMT in a variety of dysbiosis-associated disorder.
Search for mechanisms of the effect of fecal transplantation on a healthy organism and various nosological forms.