View clinical trials related to Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.
Filter by:Underlying disease mechanisms are fundamental for correct treatment selection and patient management in highly invasive and debilitating non-transmissible diseases. Even though overall disease burden of cancer may have decreased due to a higher degree of awareness, the availability of high-quality healthcare and early diagnosis may become challenging in certain neoplasms. Cholangiocarcinoma is usually diagnosed at advanced stages due to non-specific presentation and is frequently refractory to chemotherapy, causing a massive impact on patients and their families. Surgery is currently the only curative treatment but is available to only approximately 30% of patients. The combination of interventional- and immune-oncology to standard of care creates the perfect substrate for synergistic mechanisms to fight tumor growth; in situ cell death following transarterial embolization(TARE) elicits immune mediated response, inflammatory response and biomarkers of oxidative stress and increases antigen presenting T-cells which an anti-anti progam death ligand (PD-L)1 can bind to; standard of care can then add on with its known effects.The rationale of a combined- locoregional and systemic - treatment lies in the synergistic effects of each of the treatments.
Southeast Asia and China have the highest incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma worldwide, with limited treatment options and large unmet medical needs. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has gradually emerged as a promising treatment option for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Increasing evidence suggests that infusion of HAIC, which maintains high local concentrations of toxic agents in tumors without embolism, provides a significant survival benefit for patients with advanced HCC and is well-tolerated. However, there is limited evidence for the efficacy of HAIC for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Irinotecan liposome (nal-IRI) is a concentrate of an infusion solution containing 5 mg/ml irinotecan trihydrate (irinotecan sucrose salt) active substance, which is encapsulated in liposomes and prevents premature conversion of the drug to SN-38 in the liver. Liposomal irinotecan prolongs the circulation time of the drug in the plasma of patients and prolongs the tumor exposure of the drug compared to conventional irinotecan.Nal-IRI based protocol has shown positive results in the phase III trial of pancreatic carcinoma. Adebrelima(SHR-1316) is a recombinant humanized IgG4 antibody that binds efficiently and specifically to human and cynomolgus programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1, CD274, or B7-H1), a cell surface molecule that plays an important role in T cell immune function, and stimulates IFN-γ secretion from mixed lymphocyte reactions (MLRs) of dendritic cells (DCs) and CD4 + T cells. Surufatinib is a multiple kinase inhibitor targeting VEGFR 1-3, FGFR1 and CSF1R. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of irinotecan liposome-based hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with adebrelimab and surufatinib in the treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, which may bring significant clinical benefit to the iCC patients with new treatment options.
This study is a single-arm, open-arm, single-center clinical study to explore the efficacy and safety of HAIC in combination with Surufatinib and Toripalimab in patients with inoperable or metastatic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. The study was divided into three stages: screening period, treatment period and follow-up period. During the treatment period, the tumor status was evaluated by imaging every 6 weeks (±7 days), and the efficacy was changed to every 8 weeks (±7 days) after 12 weeks until the disease progressed (RECIST 1.1) or death (during the treatment of the patient) or toxicity became intolerable. The tumor treatment status and survival status after the disease progression were recorded. Safety outcome measures included AE, changes in laboratory test values, vital signs and electrocardiogram changes.
This is a single-arm, exploratory study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HAIC in combination with surufatinib and tislelizumab in the first line treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic biliary tract cancer
The aim of the study is to establishing a standardized biobank and a clinical information database for patients with benign and malignant tumors of the biliary system. With follow-up plans and advanced multiomics technology, a multiomics database for patients with benign and malignant tumors of the biliary tract will be further established. Based on the above work, real-world clinical research on the diagnosis and treatment of biliary tract tumors is about to be carried out, and a high-standard cohort research foundation is laid for precision therapy based on multiomics characteristics and molecular typing of biliary tract tumors.
The goal of this observational study is to compare the recommendations of the artificial intelligence clinical decision support system 'ADBoard', with the recommendations of physicians by tumor conferences in patients with hepatobiliary tumors. The main questions it aims to answer are: Can ADBoard achieve a high level of similar recommendations as physicians' tumor conferences? Can ADBoard consider a more complete set of patient-related data than in physicians' tumor conferences? Can ADBoard reduce the time between the first time the patient is discussed at the tumor conference and the start of the recommended treatment plan? Participants will have their hepatobiliary tumor treatments determined by either tumor conference with ADBoard, or tumor conference without ADBoard.
The clinical incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is high and insidious, and the prognosis of advanced patients is poor. The clinical manifestations of traditional chemotherapy GC and emerging targeted therapy are different in most patients, and there is still no effective scheme to evaluate the differences in individual patient reactivity. Patient-derived tumor organoids (PDO) are 3D-cultured tissues based on tumor cell dryness that reproduce a variety of biological characteristics of parental tumors in vitro and have similar drug responsiveness to tumors in vivo. This project plans to use clinical cases and optimized organoid culture system to first construct relevant organoids from unresectable ICC patient puncture samples. Secondly, based on the organoid model of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, the clinical efficacy of GC regimen was predicted, and in vitro and in vivo drug screening was conducted to explore the guidance of patient-derived tumor organoids for clinical treatment. Then, multi-omics data of organoids and in vitro and in vivo drug efficacy evaluation model were used to explore the drug resistance genes of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, providing the basis for personalized drug screening and efficacy evaluation of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
This is a prospective, Two-arm, comparative, randomized, controlled phase II trial, to explore the efficacy and safety of Regorafenib and HAIC vs. FOLFOX as Second Line Therapy for Advanced Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.
The purpose of this research is to see if combining gemcitabine, cisplatin and Durvalumab chemotherapy treatments with a direct tumor therapy called Yittrium-90, will work better together to shrink the tumor and control cancer.
This is a Phase III, prospective, randomized, three-arm, double-blind, placebo-controlled, international multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of toripalimab in combination with lenvatinib and gemcitabine-based chemotherapy compared with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment for unresectable advanced ICC. This study will enroll approximately 480 patients with unresectable advanced ICC who have received no prior systemic therapy. Patients who meet the requirements will be randomly assigned to Treatment Arm A: Toripalimab, lenvatinib, and gemcitabine-based chemotherapy or Treatment Arm B: Toripalimab, oral placebo, and gemcitabine-based chemotherapy or Treatment Arm C: Intravenous placebo, oral placebo, and gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. All patients will receive standard chemotherapy (GEMOX or GC per Investigator decision) for a maximum of 8 cycles. After the completion of standard chemotherapy, all patients continue to receive maintenance therapy with toripalimab injection or its placebo in combination with lenvatinib mesylate capsule or its placebo until unacceptable toxicity, confirmed disease progression and loss of clinical benefit as determined by the investigators, start of new anti-cancer therapy, death, other conditions requiring termination of study treatment, or the patient meets the criteria for study withdrawal, whichever occurs first. In the absence of unacceptable toxicity, patients who meet criteria for unconfirmed disease progression per RECIST v1.1 while receiving toripalimab, lenvatinib, or their placebos will be permitted to continue treatment if their clinical status or symptoms are stable or improved (as determined by the investigators) or until loss of clinical benefit. Patients with confirmed disease progression should discontinue toripalimab, lenvatinib, or their placebos. Tumor assessments will be performed at screening and during the study treatment per protocol. In the absence of progression, tumor assessments will continue as scheduled, regardless of whether study treatment ends, until confirmed disease progression or other criteria for study withdrawal are met, whichever occurs first. Patients who meet RECIST v1.1 criteria for progression should undergo tumor assessments as scheduled if clinical benefits of continuing study treatment are determined by investigators until progression is confirmed per iRECIST (iCPD), or the criteria for study withdrawal are met, whichever occurs first. Computerized tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans for efficacy evaluation will be performed at baseline, every 6 weeks (Q6W) in the first year (52 weeks), and every 9 weeks (Q9W) in the second year (after week 52). All AEs and concomitant medications during the study will be recorded. An end-of-treatment (EOT) visit will be performed within 30 days after the last dose of study treatment or termination of study treatment is confirmed by the investigator. After the EOT visit, follow-up for survival (telephone visit is allowed) will be conducted and AEs and subsequent anti-cancer therapy will be collected.