View clinical trials related to Intracardiac Thrombus.
Filter by:The goal of this observational study is to determine the efficacy of rivaroxaban treatment for intracardiac thrombi resolution in pediatric patients (< 16 years old) diagnosed with intracardiac thrombosis. The main question it aims to answer is: Does rivaroxaban treatment resolve the thrombosis during a 3-month treatment? Participants already taking rivaroxaban as part of their regular medical care for thrombosis resolution. They will undergo monthly visits to check that the treatment is progressing correctly and that no major bleeding has occurred. After 3 months of treatment, they will repeat the radiological imaging investigation to verify the actual resolution of the thrombosis.
Left ventricular thrombus is found in 10 to 25% of patients with impaired left ventricular function following ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and up to 20% in dilated cardiomyopathy in observational studies. Likewise, the incidence of atrial thrombus among atrial fibrillation patients treated by vitamin K antagonist (VKA) is between 0.25% and 7%. Despite anticoagulant therapy, intra-cardiac thrombus remains a severe complication associated with a high risk of systemic embolism and subsequent mortality but also bleeding events related to the anticoagulation therapy. The class of non-vitamin K antagonist direct oral anticoagulant (DOA) has emerged in the last decades and has systematically surpassed VKA in the different clinical settings by providing at minimum a similar efficacy and a better safety profile. In the absence of randomized study in the specific clinical setting of intracardiac thrombus, international Guidelines recommend, on the basis of expert opinion, the use of VKA for at least 3 to 6 months in case of left ventricular thrombus and there is no specific recommendation for thrombus management from other cardiac localizations. In comparison to VKA, the easier management and the large evidence of better safety of DOA make it an interesting anticoagulant strategy. Data for left ventricule thrombosis treatment are limited and only supported by observational cohorts. However, these recent cohorts have shown promising data in this indication reporting similar thrombus regression following DOA in comparison to VKA and similar ischemic outcomes although no head-to-head comparison would be powered. As a consequence, the multicentric randomized ARGONAUT trial aims to confirm these results and evaluate the impact of DOA compared to VKA on thrombus regression and clinical outcomes among patients with intracardiac thrombus, regardless of the thrombus localization and any underlying heart disease.
Embolic strokes of undetermined source (ESUS) represent a subset of cryptogenic strokes that are suspected to have an occult embolic source. The risk of stroke recurrence in patients with ESUS varies between 1.9%/year and 19.0%/year depending on the prevalence of vascular risk factors. Part of the elevated recurrence rate is due to the inability to identify high-risk treatable causes such as cardiac thrombi as those found in the left atrial appendage (LAA), left atrium (LA), left ventricle (LV), valves, or aortic arch. The most frequently used diagnostic method in clinical practice to detect cardioaortic thrombi is transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). However, the relatively low availability, higher cost, and invasive nature of TEE limit its large-scale usability. In most stroke centers, patients presenting with an acute ischemic stroke or TIA undergo a tomography (CT) angiography (CTA) of the neck and intracranial vessels. This standard of care CTA (sCTA) classically includes the aortic arch, the higher portion of the ascending/descending aorta, and the rostral portion of the cardiac chambers, but does not involve the LAA, LV, or cardiac valves. A recent study performed among 300 patients with an acute ischemic stroke showed an overall LAA thrombus detection of 6.6% and 15% in patients with AF by extending the CTA 6 cm below the carina. This is an extraordinarily high prevalence of LAA compared to 0.5% to 4.8% of intracardiac thrombi identified on TEE in most previous studies. The major limitation of previous CTA and TEE studies is their observational design, so the differing prevalence of LAA thrombi could be explained by dissimilar population characteristics or selection bias. Based on the methodological limitation of prior studies and the promising role of extended CTAs (eCTA), a randomized controlled trial comparing eCTA + standard of care stroke workup vs. sCTA + standard of care stroke workup is needed.