Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05404711 |
Other study ID # |
STUDY22030082 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
October 11, 2022 |
Est. completion date |
December 14, 2023 |
Study information
Verified date |
December 2023 |
Source |
University of Pittsburgh |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
The purpose of this research study is to determine whether continuous glucose monitors (CGM)
are a safe, effective, and acceptable way to evaluate type 2 diabetes risk in youth as
compared to the standard 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT).
This study will involve wearing a CGM, wearing a physical activity tracker, responding to
surveys, and completing at-home glucose and mixed food challenge while wearing the CGM.
Subjects will also be asked to complete an interview by phone or videoconference after
wearing the CGM.
Description:
Youth-onset type 2 diabetes (T2D), an increasingly common and aggressive disease that
disproportionately impacts racial and ethnic minorities, presents several diagnostic
challenges. The rapid loss of glycemic control soon after T2D diagnosis makes early
identification an important goal in pediatrics, and risk-based screening has been recommended
for children for over two decades. However, the screening tests currently used in practice,
including hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), fasting glucose, and 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test
(OGTT), have significant drawbacks. Real-time continuous glucose monitors (CGM) are promising
new tools for risk stratification in individuals with dysglycemia. These patient-worn medical
devices measure interstitial glucose every 5 minutes and offer glimpses into an individual's
everyday life, which may include consumption of carbohydrates in amounts larger than that
assessed in an OGTT, enhancing test sensitivity. Whether use of CGMs to evaluate type 2
diabetes risk in free-living youth is feasible and acceptable to patients and families is
unknown. Assessment of CGM with standardized, but practical, home-based glucose and
mixed-meal challenges is needed to determine facilitators and barriers to use of this
technology-driven approach in clinical practice. Without advancement in the approach to
screening for youth-onset T2D, there is ongoing risk of failure to understand which
individuals are at highest risk for complications and could benefit the most from
intervention early in the disease process.
In this single-arm prospective study, participants will attend one in-person study visit to
complete 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test after overnight fast. Participants will wear a
continuous glucose monitor and a wrist-worn actigraphy device for physical activity and sleep
measurement for 10 days beginning on the day of the study visit, then return the monitors by
mail. During the 10 day wear period, participants will respond to text message-based surveys
to document food intake, physical activity, and sleep times and will complete two at-home
challenges: 1) glucose challenge using study-provided glucose beverage that is identical to
that they consume during clinical oral glucose tolerance test; and 2) food challenge with
mixed carbohydrate/fat/protein-containing food of their choice. Glucose trends during these
at-home challenges will be compared with oral glucose tolerance test obtained during the
study visit. Individual interviews will be conducted upon completion of CGM wear to assess
acceptability of the use of at-home glucose challenge and CGM wear as a strategy to evaluate
diabetes risk in youth.