View clinical trials related to Influenza, Human.
Filter by:In randomized clinical trials and observational studies, influenza vaccination has been shown to be effective in reducing influenza-related illness, hospitalizations, cardiovascular events, and mortality in select populations. However, the real-world effectiveness of influenza vaccination is limited by its uptake. This study will investigate investigate whether digital behavioral nudges delivered via the official, mandatory Danish electronic letter system can increase influenza vaccine uptake among eligible influenza vaccination candidates.
This is a Phase 3, randomized, observer-blinded study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a single dose of a quadrivalent influenza modRNA vaccine compared to licensed inactivated influenza vaccine in healthy adults 18 years of age and older.
This trial is taking place in Los Angeles, CA at clinics within the Los Angeles Department of Health clinics. The study design is a comparative effectiveness trial design. Patients will be randomized into 1) receiving enhanced texting with a callback by a trained call-center staff member to schedule a vaccine visit if the patient presses "1" in response to the text, 2) receiving enhanced bidirectional texting with a texting response from a trained call-center staff member who will help the patient schedule a vaccine visit through a series of back-and-forth texts, or 3) standard text reminders (control group). Patients in all arms will receive reminders if they are due for influenza vaccine. Despite the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommendation in 2010 that all people above 6 months of age should receive an annual flu vaccine, vaccination rates remain low: at 6m-4.9 yrs. (70%), 5-17.9 yrs. (56%), 18-64.9 yrs. (38%), and >65 yrs. (63%). The investigators will assess the effectiveness of enhanced text R/R messages as compared to the standard of care control (standard text reminders).
This trial is taking place in Los Angeles, CA at clinics within the UCLA Health System. The study design is a 2x2 nested factorial design. Patients will be randomized into 1) receiving text based reminder messages with direct scheduling link, 2) portal-based reminder messages with direct scheduling link, or 3) the control group. Patients randomized to the intervention arms will receive reminders if they are due for influenza vaccine. Nested within the portal reminder arm, we will have two additional components for which patients will be randomized separately: 1. A pre-commitment prompt, asking patients which time (September, October, November or December) and which place (UCLA, pharmacy, workplace or school, or other) they plan to get their Influenza vaccine with tailored monthly messages based on responses (pre-commitment message with tailored recall messages with direct scheduling vs. standard portal reminders with direct scheduling). 2. A pre-appointment reminder encouraging patients to ask for their influenza vaccine at their upcoming appointment (pre-appointment reminder encouraging influenza vaccination vs. standard pre-appointment reminder not mentioning influenza vaccination) Nested within the text message reminder arm, we will have one additional component for which patients will be randomized separately: 1) A pre-appointment reminder encouraging patients to ask for their influenza vaccine at their upcoming appointment (pre-appointment reminder encouraging influenza vaccination vs. standard pre-appointment reminder not mentioning influenza vaccination) Despite the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommendation in 2010 that all people above 6 months of age should receive an annual flu vaccine, vaccination rates remain low: at 6m-4.9 yrs. (70%), 5-17.9 yrs. (56%), 18-64.9 yrs. (38%), and >65 yrs. (63%). The investigators will assess the effectiveness of MyChart R/R messages and text R/R messages as compared to the standard of care control (no messages).
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the preventative antiviral activity of CD388, as compared to saline placebo, when administered as a single dose to healthy adult participants in a human viral challenge model of influenza.
Background: 1. Burden: Health-care workers (HCWs), such as doctors, nurses, and support staff involved in direct or indirect patient care, are at increased risk of influenza virus infections. HCWs may also transmit and spread influenza among hospitalized patients and other caregivers. HCWs often (40-83%) work while experiencing influenza-like illness (ILI), increasing the likelihood of influenza transmission to colleagues and patients. 2. Knowledge gap: Despite the World Health Organization recommendation for seasonal influenza vaccination among priority target groups such as health care workers, the low-income country such as Bangladesh lacks a seasonal influenza vaccination policy among this high-risk group, and vaccine uptake remains low. 3. Relevance: This study aims to generate preliminary data on HCWs willingness to get seasonal influenza vaccines following vaccine availability and factors associated with vaccine uptakes. The data from the study will support policymakers to increase awareness and develop influenza vaccination policy among top priority groups such as health care workers. Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that awareness and availability of influenza vaccine supply would increase influenza vaccine uptake among health care workers Objectives: 1. To assess influenza vaccine uptake among healthcare workers (HCWs) following awareness and availability of influenza vaccine supply in study hospitals 2. To explore HCWs barriers and Motivators for influenza vaccine uptake 3. To understand policy makers' perspectives on the feasibility of influenza vaccination among HCWs and to share with the National Immunization Technical Advisory Group (NITAG) for a policy decision regarding influenza vaccination Methods: The study will be conducted at four tertiary-level public teaching hospitals in Bangladesh. The investigators will use a cluster randomized controlled trial design. The intervention will be randomly allocated at the facility level and will include four arms: i) availability of influenza vaccine supply; ii) influenza vaccine awareness; iii) both influenza vaccine supply and influenza vaccine awareness, and iv) control arm with no intervention. The investigators will assess influenza vaccine uptake before and after intervention and between different study arms. The investigators will also explore the barriers and motivators of vaccine uptake using a qualitative approach. To understand the policy makers' perspectives and opinions regarding influenza vaccination among health care workers, the investigators will conduct in-depth interviews. Outcome measures/variables: 1. The proportion of influenza vaccine uptake among health care workers before and after intervention and between different study arms 2. Different motivators and barriers to influenza vaccine uptake
This is a randomized, observer-blinded, Phase 2 study evaluating the safety and immunogenicity of a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARSCoV2) recombinant spike (rS) (SARS-CoV-2 rS) nanoparticle and quadrivalent hemagglutinin (HA) nanoparticle influenza vaccine (qNIV) combination vaccine with Matrix-M™ adjuvant; this combination vaccine.
This is a prospective, single-arm study designed to understand the mechanisms that lead to a loss of response to influenza vaccine in older adults. The investigators will recruit and longitudinally follow a cohort of 66 older adults (65 years and older) who will receive three different influenza vaccines over three annual influenza seasons. Blood samples will be collected from the participants at each of the sixteen study visits over three years. Nasal swab and stool samples will also be collected from participants at seven time-points across the study period. The study is not designed to assess safety or tolerability of the influenza vaccines administered as part of this study.
The purpose of this pragmatic randomized trial is to evaluate the relative vaccine effectiveness of high-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV-HD) vs. standard-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV-SD) in older adults. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to either QIV-HD or QIV-SD.
This randomized, active comparator trial will compare the clinical efficacy of recombinant influenza vaccine (RIV) to standard-dose egg-based inactivated influenza vaccine (SD IIV) among adults aged 18-64 years. The primary study hypothesis is that the clinical efficacy of RIV is superior to that of SD IIV to prevent and attenuate influenza-like illness (ILI)-associated influenza virus infection. Relative efficacy will be assessed by comparing rates of ILI-associated reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-confirmed influenza virus infection and measures of infection and illness attenuation among participants who receive RIV versus SD IIV. A secondary hypothesis is that humoral and cell-mediated immune responses to RIV are superior to responses to SD IIV. Relative immunogenicity will be assessed by comparing markers of humoral and cell-mediated immune responses post-vaccination among a subset of participants who receive RIV versus SD IIV.